Cargando…
Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care
BACKGROUND: Nasal inhalation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) seems an effective anti-emetic for the symptomatic treatment of nausea in the emergency department (ED) compared to conventional anti-emetics (Ondansetron and Metoclopramide). However, it is not yet known what the practical consequences are rel...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-021-00334-z |
_version_ | 1783655129601277952 |
---|---|
author | Veldhuis, Peter Melse, Maartje Mullaart, Nieke |
author_facet | Veldhuis, Peter Melse, Maartje Mullaart, Nieke |
author_sort | Veldhuis, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nasal inhalation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) seems an effective anti-emetic for the symptomatic treatment of nausea in the emergency department (ED) compared to conventional anti-emetics (Ondansetron and Metoclopramide). However, it is not yet known what the practical consequences are related to the use of IPA in the ED. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the practical implications for patient care associated with IPA use and to evaluate the viability of permanent implementation of IPA inhalation as a first-line therapy for nausea in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center implementation study comparing ED-based care for nauseated patients before (n=106) and after (n=104) the introduction of IPA. We evaluated the treatment process and cost and assessed implementation using a survey based on recommended implementation outcome measures. RESULTS: Comparing baseline phase to implementation phase, we found a significant increase in the percentage of patients receiving nausea treatment (66.0% versus 97.1%; p<0.001) and a reduction in time to treatment initiation (7 versus 1 min, p<0.001). Additionally, IPA introduction was associated with a decrease in the administration of conventional anti-emetics (0.52 versus 0.23 administrations per patient, p<0.001) and a notable drop in treatment cost (€1.33 versus €0.67 per patient). Nurses were content with IPA implementation and regarded definitive implementation as feasible and sustainable. CONCLUSION: Implementation of IPA as the first-line nausea treatment in the ED can increase the quality of care and improve care efficiency. Definitive implementation of IPA as a first-line treatment in the ED is both viable and practically feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR, NL7717, Registered on March 23, 2018 - Retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-021-00334-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7905555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79055552021-02-25 Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care Veldhuis, Peter Melse, Maartje Mullaart, Nieke Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Nasal inhalation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) seems an effective anti-emetic for the symptomatic treatment of nausea in the emergency department (ED) compared to conventional anti-emetics (Ondansetron and Metoclopramide). However, it is not yet known what the practical consequences are related to the use of IPA in the ED. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the practical implications for patient care associated with IPA use and to evaluate the viability of permanent implementation of IPA inhalation as a first-line therapy for nausea in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center implementation study comparing ED-based care for nauseated patients before (n=106) and after (n=104) the introduction of IPA. We evaluated the treatment process and cost and assessed implementation using a survey based on recommended implementation outcome measures. RESULTS: Comparing baseline phase to implementation phase, we found a significant increase in the percentage of patients receiving nausea treatment (66.0% versus 97.1%; p<0.001) and a reduction in time to treatment initiation (7 versus 1 min, p<0.001). Additionally, IPA introduction was associated with a decrease in the administration of conventional anti-emetics (0.52 versus 0.23 administrations per patient, p<0.001) and a notable drop in treatment cost (€1.33 versus €0.67 per patient). Nurses were content with IPA implementation and regarded definitive implementation as feasible and sustainable. CONCLUSION: Implementation of IPA as the first-line nausea treatment in the ED can increase the quality of care and improve care efficiency. Definitive implementation of IPA as a first-line treatment in the ED is both viable and practically feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR, NL7717, Registered on March 23, 2018 - Retrospectively registered SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-021-00334-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7905555/ /pubmed/33627064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-021-00334-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Veldhuis, Peter Melse, Maartje Mullaart, Nieke Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title | Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title_full | Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title_fullStr | Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title_short | Implementation of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
title_sort | implementation of isopropyl alcohol (ipa) inhalation as the first-line treatment for nausea in the emergency department: practical advantages and influence on the quality of care |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-021-00334-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veldhuispeter implementationofisopropylalcoholipainhalationasthefirstlinetreatmentfornauseaintheemergencydepartmentpracticaladvantagesandinfluenceonthequalityofcare AT melsemaartje implementationofisopropylalcoholipainhalationasthefirstlinetreatmentfornauseaintheemergencydepartmentpracticaladvantagesandinfluenceonthequalityofcare AT mullaartnieke implementationofisopropylalcoholipainhalationasthefirstlinetreatmentfornauseaintheemergencydepartmentpracticaladvantagesandinfluenceonthequalityofcare |