Cargando…

A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions

While a necessary step toward enhancing rigor and reproducibility of veterinary clinical trials conducted on the translational spectrum includes understanding the current state of the field, no broad assessment of existing veterinary clinical trial resources has been previously conducted. Funded by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Sarah A., McCleary-Wheeler, Angela, Coates, Joan R, Olby, Natasha, London, Cheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02795-z
_version_ 1783655137977303040
author Moore, Sarah A.
McCleary-Wheeler, Angela
Coates, Joan R
Olby, Natasha
London, Cheryl
author_facet Moore, Sarah A.
McCleary-Wheeler, Angela
Coates, Joan R
Olby, Natasha
London, Cheryl
author_sort Moore, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description While a necessary step toward enhancing rigor and reproducibility of veterinary clinical trials conducted on the translational spectrum includes understanding the current state of the field, no broad assessment of existing veterinary clinical trial resources has been previously conducted. Funded by a CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) pilot award, the goal of this project was to conduct an electronic survey of North American Veterinary Colleges regarding practices in veterinary clinical trial review, approval, conduct, and support in order to identify opportunities to leverage existing resources and develop new ones to enhance the impact of veterinary and translational health research. A total of 30 institutions were invited to participate in the survey and the survey response rate was 73 %. The most common source of funding noted for veterinary clinical research was industry (33 %); however, respondents reported that only 5 % (3.7–11.0) of studies were FDA-regulated. Respondents indicated that most studies (80 %); conducted at their institution were single site studies. Study review and approval involved the IACUC either solely, or in combination with a hospital review board, at 95.5 % of institutions. Workforce training related to clinical research best practices was variable across institutions. Opportunities were identified to strengthen infrastructure through harmonization of clinical research review and approval practices. This might naturally lead to expansion of multi-site studies. Based on respondent feedback, future workforce development initiatives might center on training in the specifics of conducting FDA-sponsored research, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), clinical study budget design, grants management, adverse event reporting, study monitoring and use of electronic data capture platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7905595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79055952021-02-25 A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions Moore, Sarah A. McCleary-Wheeler, Angela Coates, Joan R Olby, Natasha London, Cheryl BMC Vet Res Guidelines While a necessary step toward enhancing rigor and reproducibility of veterinary clinical trials conducted on the translational spectrum includes understanding the current state of the field, no broad assessment of existing veterinary clinical trial resources has been previously conducted. Funded by a CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) pilot award, the goal of this project was to conduct an electronic survey of North American Veterinary Colleges regarding practices in veterinary clinical trial review, approval, conduct, and support in order to identify opportunities to leverage existing resources and develop new ones to enhance the impact of veterinary and translational health research. A total of 30 institutions were invited to participate in the survey and the survey response rate was 73 %. The most common source of funding noted for veterinary clinical research was industry (33 %); however, respondents reported that only 5 % (3.7–11.0) of studies were FDA-regulated. Respondents indicated that most studies (80 %); conducted at their institution were single site studies. Study review and approval involved the IACUC either solely, or in combination with a hospital review board, at 95.5 % of institutions. Workforce training related to clinical research best practices was variable across institutions. Opportunities were identified to strengthen infrastructure through harmonization of clinical research review and approval practices. This might naturally lead to expansion of multi-site studies. Based on respondent feedback, future workforce development initiatives might center on training in the specifics of conducting FDA-sponsored research, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), clinical study budget design, grants management, adverse event reporting, study monitoring and use of electronic data capture platforms. BioMed Central 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7905595/ /pubmed/33632219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02795-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Guidelines
Moore, Sarah A.
McCleary-Wheeler, Angela
Coates, Joan R
Olby, Natasha
London, Cheryl
A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title_full A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title_fullStr A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title_full_unstemmed A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title_short A CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in North American veterinary institutions
title_sort ctsa one health alliance (coha) survey of clinical trial infrastructure in north american veterinary institutions
topic Guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02795-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mooresaraha actsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT mcclearywheelerangela actsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT coatesjoanr actsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT olbynatasha actsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT londoncheryl actsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT mooresaraha ctsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT mcclearywheelerangela ctsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT coatesjoanr ctsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT olbynatasha ctsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions
AT londoncheryl ctsaonehealthalliancecohasurveyofclinicaltrialinfrastructureinnorthamericanveterinaryinstitutions