Cargando…

Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set

BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horning, Matthew P., Delahunt, Charles B., Bachman, Christine M., Luchavez, Jennifer, Luna, Christian, Hu, Liming, Jaiswal, Mayoore S., Thompson, Clay M., Kulhare, Sourabh, Janko, Samantha, Wilson, Benjamin K., Ostbye, Travis, Mehanian, Martha, Gebrehiwot, Roman, Yun, Grace, Bell, David, Proux, Stephane, Carter, Jane Y., Oyibo, Wellington, Gamboa, Dionicia, Dhorda, Mehul, Vongpromek, Ranitha, Chiodini, Peter L., Ogutu, Bernhards, Long, Earl G., Tun, Kyaw, Burkot, Thomas R., Lilley, Ken, Mehanian, Courosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3
_version_ 1783655138210086912
author Horning, Matthew P.
Delahunt, Charles B.
Bachman, Christine M.
Luchavez, Jennifer
Luna, Christian
Hu, Liming
Jaiswal, Mayoore S.
Thompson, Clay M.
Kulhare, Sourabh
Janko, Samantha
Wilson, Benjamin K.
Ostbye, Travis
Mehanian, Martha
Gebrehiwot, Roman
Yun, Grace
Bell, David
Proux, Stephane
Carter, Jane Y.
Oyibo, Wellington
Gamboa, Dionicia
Dhorda, Mehul
Vongpromek, Ranitha
Chiodini, Peter L.
Ogutu, Bernhards
Long, Earl G.
Tun, Kyaw
Burkot, Thomas R.
Lilley, Ken
Mehanian, Courosh
author_facet Horning, Matthew P.
Delahunt, Charles B.
Bachman, Christine M.
Luchavez, Jennifer
Luna, Christian
Hu, Liming
Jaiswal, Mayoore S.
Thompson, Clay M.
Kulhare, Sourabh
Janko, Samantha
Wilson, Benjamin K.
Ostbye, Travis
Mehanian, Martha
Gebrehiwot, Roman
Yun, Grace
Bell, David
Proux, Stephane
Carter, Jane Y.
Oyibo, Wellington
Gamboa, Dionicia
Dhorda, Mehul
Vongpromek, Ranitha
Chiodini, Peter L.
Ogutu, Bernhards
Long, Earl G.
Tun, Kyaw
Burkot, Thomas R.
Lilley, Ken
Mehanian, Courosh
author_sort Horning, Matthew P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated. METHODS: The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set. RESULTS: The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set. CONCLUSIONS: EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7905596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79055962021-02-25 Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set Horning, Matthew P. Delahunt, Charles B. Bachman, Christine M. Luchavez, Jennifer Luna, Christian Hu, Liming Jaiswal, Mayoore S. Thompson, Clay M. Kulhare, Sourabh Janko, Samantha Wilson, Benjamin K. Ostbye, Travis Mehanian, Martha Gebrehiwot, Roman Yun, Grace Bell, David Proux, Stephane Carter, Jane Y. Oyibo, Wellington Gamboa, Dionicia Dhorda, Mehul Vongpromek, Ranitha Chiodini, Peter L. Ogutu, Bernhards Long, Earl G. Tun, Kyaw Burkot, Thomas R. Lilley, Ken Mehanian, Courosh Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated. METHODS: The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set. RESULTS: The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set. CONCLUSIONS: EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings. BioMed Central 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7905596/ /pubmed/33632222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Horning, Matthew P.
Delahunt, Charles B.
Bachman, Christine M.
Luchavez, Jennifer
Luna, Christian
Hu, Liming
Jaiswal, Mayoore S.
Thompson, Clay M.
Kulhare, Sourabh
Janko, Samantha
Wilson, Benjamin K.
Ostbye, Travis
Mehanian, Martha
Gebrehiwot, Roman
Yun, Grace
Bell, David
Proux, Stephane
Carter, Jane Y.
Oyibo, Wellington
Gamboa, Dionicia
Dhorda, Mehul
Vongpromek, Ranitha
Chiodini, Peter L.
Ogutu, Bernhards
Long, Earl G.
Tun, Kyaw
Burkot, Thomas R.
Lilley, Ken
Mehanian, Courosh
Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title_full Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title_fullStr Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title_short Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
title_sort performance of a fully‐automated system on a who malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3
work_keys_str_mv AT horningmatthewp performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT delahuntcharlesb performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT bachmanchristinem performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT luchavezjennifer performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT lunachristian performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT huliming performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT jaiswalmayoores performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT thompsonclaym performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT kulharesourabh performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT jankosamantha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT wilsonbenjamink performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT ostbyetravis performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT mehanianmartha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT gebrehiwotroman performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT yungrace performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT belldavid performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT prouxstephane performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT carterjaney performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT oyibowellington performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT gamboadionicia performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT dhordamehul performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT vongpromekranitha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT chiodinipeterl performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT ogutubernhards performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT longearlg performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT tunkyaw performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT burkotthomasr performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT lilleyken performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset
AT mehaniancourosh performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset