Cargando…
Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3 |
_version_ | 1783655138210086912 |
---|---|
author | Horning, Matthew P. Delahunt, Charles B. Bachman, Christine M. Luchavez, Jennifer Luna, Christian Hu, Liming Jaiswal, Mayoore S. Thompson, Clay M. Kulhare, Sourabh Janko, Samantha Wilson, Benjamin K. Ostbye, Travis Mehanian, Martha Gebrehiwot, Roman Yun, Grace Bell, David Proux, Stephane Carter, Jane Y. Oyibo, Wellington Gamboa, Dionicia Dhorda, Mehul Vongpromek, Ranitha Chiodini, Peter L. Ogutu, Bernhards Long, Earl G. Tun, Kyaw Burkot, Thomas R. Lilley, Ken Mehanian, Courosh |
author_facet | Horning, Matthew P. Delahunt, Charles B. Bachman, Christine M. Luchavez, Jennifer Luna, Christian Hu, Liming Jaiswal, Mayoore S. Thompson, Clay M. Kulhare, Sourabh Janko, Samantha Wilson, Benjamin K. Ostbye, Travis Mehanian, Martha Gebrehiwot, Roman Yun, Grace Bell, David Proux, Stephane Carter, Jane Y. Oyibo, Wellington Gamboa, Dionicia Dhorda, Mehul Vongpromek, Ranitha Chiodini, Peter L. Ogutu, Bernhards Long, Earl G. Tun, Kyaw Burkot, Thomas R. Lilley, Ken Mehanian, Courosh |
author_sort | Horning, Matthew P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated. METHODS: The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set. RESULTS: The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set. CONCLUSIONS: EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7905596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79055962021-02-25 Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set Horning, Matthew P. Delahunt, Charles B. Bachman, Christine M. Luchavez, Jennifer Luna, Christian Hu, Liming Jaiswal, Mayoore S. Thompson, Clay M. Kulhare, Sourabh Janko, Samantha Wilson, Benjamin K. Ostbye, Travis Mehanian, Martha Gebrehiwot, Roman Yun, Grace Bell, David Proux, Stephane Carter, Jane Y. Oyibo, Wellington Gamboa, Dionicia Dhorda, Mehul Vongpromek, Ranitha Chiodini, Peter L. Ogutu, Bernhards Long, Earl G. Tun, Kyaw Burkot, Thomas R. Lilley, Ken Mehanian, Courosh Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated. METHODS: The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set. RESULTS: The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set. CONCLUSIONS: EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings. BioMed Central 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7905596/ /pubmed/33632222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Horning, Matthew P. Delahunt, Charles B. Bachman, Christine M. Luchavez, Jennifer Luna, Christian Hu, Liming Jaiswal, Mayoore S. Thompson, Clay M. Kulhare, Sourabh Janko, Samantha Wilson, Benjamin K. Ostbye, Travis Mehanian, Martha Gebrehiwot, Roman Yun, Grace Bell, David Proux, Stephane Carter, Jane Y. Oyibo, Wellington Gamboa, Dionicia Dhorda, Mehul Vongpromek, Ranitha Chiodini, Peter L. Ogutu, Bernhards Long, Earl G. Tun, Kyaw Burkot, Thomas R. Lilley, Ken Mehanian, Courosh Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title | Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title_full | Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title_fullStr | Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title_short | Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
title_sort | performance of a fully‐automated system on a who malaria microscopy evaluation slide set |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03631-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horningmatthewp performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT delahuntcharlesb performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT bachmanchristinem performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT luchavezjennifer performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT lunachristian performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT huliming performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT jaiswalmayoores performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT thompsonclaym performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT kulharesourabh performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT jankosamantha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT wilsonbenjamink performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT ostbyetravis performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT mehanianmartha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT gebrehiwotroman performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT yungrace performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT belldavid performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT prouxstephane performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT carterjaney performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT oyibowellington performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT gamboadionicia performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT dhordamehul performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT vongpromekranitha performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT chiodinipeterl performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT ogutubernhards performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT longearlg performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT tunkyaw performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT burkotthomasr performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT lilleyken performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset AT mehaniancourosh performanceofafullyautomatedsystemonawhomalariamicroscopyevaluationslideset |