Cargando…

The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks

BACKGROUND: A handheld metal noisemaker known as a “clicker” is widely used to train new behaviors in dogs; however, evidence for their superior efficacy compared to providing solely primary reinforcement or other secondary reinforcers in the acquisition of novel behavior in dogs is largely anecdota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilchrist, Rachel J., Gunter, Lisa M., Anderson, Samantha F., Wynne, Clive D.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665026
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10881
_version_ 1783655220133232640
author Gilchrist, Rachel J.
Gunter, Lisa M.
Anderson, Samantha F.
Wynne, Clive D.L.
author_facet Gilchrist, Rachel J.
Gunter, Lisa M.
Anderson, Samantha F.
Wynne, Clive D.L.
author_sort Gilchrist, Rachel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A handheld metal noisemaker known as a “clicker” is widely used to train new behaviors in dogs; however, evidence for their superior efficacy compared to providing solely primary reinforcement or other secondary reinforcers in the acquisition of novel behavior in dogs is largely anecdotal. METHODS: Three experiments were conducted to determine under what circumstances a clicker secondary reinforcer may result in acquisition of a novel behavior more rapidly or to a higher level compared to other readily available reinforcement methods. In Experiment 1, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a novel sit and stay behavior of increasing duration with either the delivery of food alone, a verbal stimulus paired with food, or a clicker with food. The group that received only a primary reinforcer reached a significantly higher criterion of training success than the group trained with a verbal secondary reinforcer. Performance of the group experiencing a clicker as a secondary reinforcer was intermediate between the other two groups, but not significantly different from either. In Experiment 2, three groups of 25 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose targeting behavior and then perform that behavior at increasing distances from the experimenter using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as in Experiment 1. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. In Experiment 3, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose-targeting behavior upon an array of wooden blocks with task difficulty increasing throughout testing using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as previously tested. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. RESULTS: Overall, the findings suggest that both primary reinforcement alone as well as a verbal or clicker secondary reinforcer can be used successfully in training a dog to perform a novel behavior, but that no positive reinforcement method demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than any other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7906040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79060402021-03-03 The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks Gilchrist, Rachel J. Gunter, Lisa M. Anderson, Samantha F. Wynne, Clive D.L. PeerJ Animal Behavior BACKGROUND: A handheld metal noisemaker known as a “clicker” is widely used to train new behaviors in dogs; however, evidence for their superior efficacy compared to providing solely primary reinforcement or other secondary reinforcers in the acquisition of novel behavior in dogs is largely anecdotal. METHODS: Three experiments were conducted to determine under what circumstances a clicker secondary reinforcer may result in acquisition of a novel behavior more rapidly or to a higher level compared to other readily available reinforcement methods. In Experiment 1, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a novel sit and stay behavior of increasing duration with either the delivery of food alone, a verbal stimulus paired with food, or a clicker with food. The group that received only a primary reinforcer reached a significantly higher criterion of training success than the group trained with a verbal secondary reinforcer. Performance of the group experiencing a clicker as a secondary reinforcer was intermediate between the other two groups, but not significantly different from either. In Experiment 2, three groups of 25 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose targeting behavior and then perform that behavior at increasing distances from the experimenter using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as in Experiment 1. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. In Experiment 3, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose-targeting behavior upon an array of wooden blocks with task difficulty increasing throughout testing using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as previously tested. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. RESULTS: Overall, the findings suggest that both primary reinforcement alone as well as a verbal or clicker secondary reinforcer can be used successfully in training a dog to perform a novel behavior, but that no positive reinforcement method demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than any other. PeerJ Inc. 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7906040/ /pubmed/33665026 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10881 Text en © 2021 Gilchrist et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Gilchrist, Rachel J.
Gunter, Lisa M.
Anderson, Samantha F.
Wynne, Clive D.L.
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title_full The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title_fullStr The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title_full_unstemmed The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title_short The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
title_sort click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other reinforcement methods in training naïve dogs to perform new tasks
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665026
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10881
work_keys_str_mv AT gilchristrachelj theclickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT gunterlisam theclickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT andersonsamanthaf theclickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT wynneclivedl theclickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT gilchristrachelj clickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT gunterlisam clickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT andersonsamanthaf clickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks
AT wynneclivedl clickisnotthetricktheefficacyofclickersandotherreinforcementmethodsintrainingnaivedogstoperformnewtasks