Cargando…
A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466 |
_version_ | 1783655283343491072 |
---|---|
author | Remus, Alexandria Smith, Valerie Gutke, Annelie Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña Mørkved, Siv Wikmar, Lena Nilsson Öberg, Birgitta Olsson, Christina Robinson, Hilde Stendal Stuge, Britt Wuytack, Francesca |
author_facet | Remus, Alexandria Smith, Valerie Gutke, Annelie Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña Mørkved, Siv Wikmar, Lena Nilsson Öberg, Birgitta Olsson, Christina Robinson, Hilde Stendal Stuge, Britt Wuytack, Francesca |
author_sort | Remus, Alexandria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the “life impact” domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance. CONCLUSION: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS. CORE OUTCOME SET REGISTRATION: This PGP-COS was registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) in January 2017 (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/958). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7906405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79064052021-03-03 A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS Remus, Alexandria Smith, Valerie Gutke, Annelie Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña Mørkved, Siv Wikmar, Lena Nilsson Öberg, Birgitta Olsson, Christina Robinson, Hilde Stendal Stuge, Britt Wuytack, Francesca PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the “life impact” domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance. CONCLUSION: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS. CORE OUTCOME SET REGISTRATION: This PGP-COS was registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) in January 2017 (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/958). Public Library of Science 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7906405/ /pubmed/33630941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466 Text en © 2021 Remus et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Remus, Alexandria Smith, Valerie Gutke, Annelie Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña Mørkved, Siv Wikmar, Lena Nilsson Öberg, Birgitta Olsson, Christina Robinson, Hilde Stendal Stuge, Britt Wuytack, Francesca A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title_full | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title_fullStr | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title_full_unstemmed | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title_short | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS |
title_sort | core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: pgp-cos |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT remusalexandria acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT smithvalerie acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT gutkeannelie acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT menajuanjosesaldana acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT mørkvedsiv acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT wikmarlenanilsson acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT obergbirgitta acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT olssonchristina acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT robinsonhildestendal acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT stugebritt acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT wuytackfrancesca acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT remusalexandria coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT smithvalerie coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT gutkeannelie coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT menajuanjosesaldana coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT mørkvedsiv coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT wikmarlenanilsson coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT obergbirgitta coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT olssonchristina coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT robinsonhildestendal coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT stugebritt coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos AT wuytackfrancesca coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos |