Cargando…

A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Remus, Alexandria, Smith, Valerie, Gutke, Annelie, Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña, Mørkved, Siv, Wikmar, Lena Nilsson, Öberg, Birgitta, Olsson, Christina, Robinson, Hilde Stendal, Stuge, Britt, Wuytack, Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466
_version_ 1783655283343491072
author Remus, Alexandria
Smith, Valerie
Gutke, Annelie
Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña
Mørkved, Siv
Wikmar, Lena Nilsson
Öberg, Birgitta
Olsson, Christina
Robinson, Hilde Stendal
Stuge, Britt
Wuytack, Francesca
author_facet Remus, Alexandria
Smith, Valerie
Gutke, Annelie
Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña
Mørkved, Siv
Wikmar, Lena Nilsson
Öberg, Birgitta
Olsson, Christina
Robinson, Hilde Stendal
Stuge, Britt
Wuytack, Francesca
author_sort Remus, Alexandria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the “life impact” domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance. CONCLUSION: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS. CORE OUTCOME SET REGISTRATION: This PGP-COS was registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) in January 2017 (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/958).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7906405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79064052021-03-03 A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS Remus, Alexandria Smith, Valerie Gutke, Annelie Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña Mørkved, Siv Wikmar, Lena Nilsson Öberg, Birgitta Olsson, Christina Robinson, Hilde Stendal Stuge, Britt Wuytack, Francesca PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the “life impact” domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance. CONCLUSION: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS. CORE OUTCOME SET REGISTRATION: This PGP-COS was registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) in January 2017 (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/958). Public Library of Science 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7906405/ /pubmed/33630941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466 Text en © 2021 Remus et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Remus, Alexandria
Smith, Valerie
Gutke, Annelie
Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña
Mørkved, Siv
Wikmar, Lena Nilsson
Öberg, Birgitta
Olsson, Christina
Robinson, Hilde Stendal
Stuge, Britt
Wuytack, Francesca
A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title_full A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title_fullStr A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title_full_unstemmed A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title_short A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
title_sort core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: pgp-cos
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247466
work_keys_str_mv AT remusalexandria acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT smithvalerie acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT gutkeannelie acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT menajuanjosesaldana acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT mørkvedsiv acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT wikmarlenanilsson acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT obergbirgitta acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT olssonchristina acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT robinsonhildestendal acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT stugebritt acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT wuytackfrancesca acoreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT remusalexandria coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT smithvalerie coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT gutkeannelie coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT menajuanjosesaldana coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT mørkvedsiv coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT wikmarlenanilsson coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT obergbirgitta coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT olssonchristina coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT robinsonhildestendal coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT stugebritt coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos
AT wuytackfrancesca coreoutcomesetforresearchandclinicalpracticeinwomenwithpelvicgirdlepainpgpcos