Cargando…

Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chuan, Luo, Fengming, Liu, Chengwu, Xiong, Nian, Xu, Zhihua, Zhang, Wei, Yang, Ming, Wang, Ye, Liu, Dan, Yu, Chao, Zeng, Jia, Zhang, Li, Li, Duo, Liu, Yanbin, Feng, Mei, Liu, Ruoyang, Mei, Jiandong, Deng, Senyi, Zeng, Zhen, He, Yuanhong, Liu, Haiyan, Shi, Zhengyu, Duan, Meng, Kang, Deying, Liao, Jiayu, Li, Weimin, Liu, Lunxu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329
_version_ 1783655326164189184
author Li, Chuan
Luo, Fengming
Liu, Chengwu
Xiong, Nian
Xu, Zhihua
Zhang, Wei
Yang, Ming
Wang, Ye
Liu, Dan
Yu, Chao
Zeng, Jia
Zhang, Li
Li, Duo
Liu, Yanbin
Feng, Mei
Liu, Ruoyang
Mei, Jiandong
Deng, Senyi
Zeng, Zhen
He, Yuanhong
Liu, Haiyan
Shi, Zhengyu
Duan, Meng
Kang, Deying
Liao, Jiayu
Li, Weimin
Liu, Lunxu
author_facet Li, Chuan
Luo, Fengming
Liu, Chengwu
Xiong, Nian
Xu, Zhihua
Zhang, Wei
Yang, Ming
Wang, Ye
Liu, Dan
Yu, Chao
Zeng, Jia
Zhang, Li
Li, Duo
Liu, Yanbin
Feng, Mei
Liu, Ruoyang
Mei, Jiandong
Deng, Senyi
Zeng, Zhen
He, Yuanhong
Liu, Haiyan
Shi, Zhengyu
Duan, Meng
Kang, Deying
Liao, Jiayu
Li, Weimin
Liu, Lunxu
author_sort Li, Chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19. METHOD: In this multicenter randomized (1:1) trial, patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 received either rSIFN-co nebulization or interferon-alpha nebulization added to baseline antiviral agents for no more than 28 days. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included the overall rate of clinical improvement assessed on day 28, the time to radiological improvement and virus nucleic acid negative conversion. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the safety set (46 patients assigned to rSIFN-co group, 48 to interferon-alpha group). The time to clinical improvement was 11.5 days versus 14.0 days (95% CI 1.10 to 2.81, p = .019); the overall rate of clinical improvement on day 28 was 93.5% versus 77.1% (difference, 16.4%; 95% CI 3% to 30%); the time to radiological improvement was 8.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .002), the time to virus nucleic acid negative conversion was 7.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .018) in the rSIFN-co and interferon alpha arms, respectively. Adverse events were balanced with no deaths among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: rSIFN-co was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 when combined with baseline antiviral agents. rSIFN-co therapy alone or combined with other antiviral therapy is worth to be further studied. KEY MESSAGES: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. Interferon alphas, by inducing both innate and adaptive immune responses, have shown clinical efficacy in treating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In this multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, clinical trial which included 94 participants with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the rSIFN-co plus antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than interferon-alpha plus antiviral agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7906612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79066122021-03-11 Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial Li, Chuan Luo, Fengming Liu, Chengwu Xiong, Nian Xu, Zhihua Zhang, Wei Yang, Ming Wang, Ye Liu, Dan Yu, Chao Zeng, Jia Zhang, Li Li, Duo Liu, Yanbin Feng, Mei Liu, Ruoyang Mei, Jiandong Deng, Senyi Zeng, Zhen He, Yuanhong Liu, Haiyan Shi, Zhengyu Duan, Meng Kang, Deying Liao, Jiayu Li, Weimin Liu, Lunxu Ann Med Infectious Diseases BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19. METHOD: In this multicenter randomized (1:1) trial, patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 received either rSIFN-co nebulization or interferon-alpha nebulization added to baseline antiviral agents for no more than 28 days. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included the overall rate of clinical improvement assessed on day 28, the time to radiological improvement and virus nucleic acid negative conversion. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the safety set (46 patients assigned to rSIFN-co group, 48 to interferon-alpha group). The time to clinical improvement was 11.5 days versus 14.0 days (95% CI 1.10 to 2.81, p = .019); the overall rate of clinical improvement on day 28 was 93.5% versus 77.1% (difference, 16.4%; 95% CI 3% to 30%); the time to radiological improvement was 8.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .002), the time to virus nucleic acid negative conversion was 7.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .018) in the rSIFN-co and interferon alpha arms, respectively. Adverse events were balanced with no deaths among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: rSIFN-co was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 when combined with baseline antiviral agents. rSIFN-co therapy alone or combined with other antiviral therapy is worth to be further studied. KEY MESSAGES: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. Interferon alphas, by inducing both innate and adaptive immune responses, have shown clinical efficacy in treating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In this multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, clinical trial which included 94 participants with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the rSIFN-co plus antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than interferon-alpha plus antiviral agents. Taylor & Francis 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7906612/ /pubmed/33620016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Li, Chuan
Luo, Fengming
Liu, Chengwu
Xiong, Nian
Xu, Zhihua
Zhang, Wei
Yang, Ming
Wang, Ye
Liu, Dan
Yu, Chao
Zeng, Jia
Zhang, Li
Li, Duo
Liu, Yanbin
Feng, Mei
Liu, Ruoyang
Mei, Jiandong
Deng, Senyi
Zeng, Zhen
He, Yuanhong
Liu, Haiyan
Shi, Zhengyu
Duan, Meng
Kang, Deying
Liao, Jiayu
Li, Weimin
Liu, Lunxu
Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title_full Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title_short Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
title_sort effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe covid-19: a randomised clinical trial
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329
work_keys_str_mv AT lichuan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT luofengming effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liuchengwu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT xiongnian effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT xuzhihua effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT zhangwei effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yangming effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT wangye effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liudan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yuchao effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT zengjia effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT zhangli effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liduo effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liuyanbin effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT fengmei effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liuruoyang effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT meijiandong effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT dengsenyi effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT zengzhen effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT heyuanhong effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liuhaiyan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT shizhengyu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT duanmeng effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kangdeying effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liaojiayu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liweimin effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liulunxu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial