Cargando…
Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329 |
_version_ | 1783655326164189184 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chuan Luo, Fengming Liu, Chengwu Xiong, Nian Xu, Zhihua Zhang, Wei Yang, Ming Wang, Ye Liu, Dan Yu, Chao Zeng, Jia Zhang, Li Li, Duo Liu, Yanbin Feng, Mei Liu, Ruoyang Mei, Jiandong Deng, Senyi Zeng, Zhen He, Yuanhong Liu, Haiyan Shi, Zhengyu Duan, Meng Kang, Deying Liao, Jiayu Li, Weimin Liu, Lunxu |
author_facet | Li, Chuan Luo, Fengming Liu, Chengwu Xiong, Nian Xu, Zhihua Zhang, Wei Yang, Ming Wang, Ye Liu, Dan Yu, Chao Zeng, Jia Zhang, Li Li, Duo Liu, Yanbin Feng, Mei Liu, Ruoyang Mei, Jiandong Deng, Senyi Zeng, Zhen He, Yuanhong Liu, Haiyan Shi, Zhengyu Duan, Meng Kang, Deying Liao, Jiayu Li, Weimin Liu, Lunxu |
author_sort | Li, Chuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19. METHOD: In this multicenter randomized (1:1) trial, patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 received either rSIFN-co nebulization or interferon-alpha nebulization added to baseline antiviral agents for no more than 28 days. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included the overall rate of clinical improvement assessed on day 28, the time to radiological improvement and virus nucleic acid negative conversion. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the safety set (46 patients assigned to rSIFN-co group, 48 to interferon-alpha group). The time to clinical improvement was 11.5 days versus 14.0 days (95% CI 1.10 to 2.81, p = .019); the overall rate of clinical improvement on day 28 was 93.5% versus 77.1% (difference, 16.4%; 95% CI 3% to 30%); the time to radiological improvement was 8.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .002), the time to virus nucleic acid negative conversion was 7.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .018) in the rSIFN-co and interferon alpha arms, respectively. Adverse events were balanced with no deaths among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: rSIFN-co was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 when combined with baseline antiviral agents. rSIFN-co therapy alone or combined with other antiviral therapy is worth to be further studied. KEY MESSAGES: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. Interferon alphas, by inducing both innate and adaptive immune responses, have shown clinical efficacy in treating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In this multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, clinical trial which included 94 participants with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the rSIFN-co plus antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than interferon-alpha plus antiviral agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7906612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79066122021-03-11 Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial Li, Chuan Luo, Fengming Liu, Chengwu Xiong, Nian Xu, Zhihua Zhang, Wei Yang, Ming Wang, Ye Liu, Dan Yu, Chao Zeng, Jia Zhang, Li Li, Duo Liu, Yanbin Feng, Mei Liu, Ruoyang Mei, Jiandong Deng, Senyi Zeng, Zhen He, Yuanhong Liu, Haiyan Shi, Zhengyu Duan, Meng Kang, Deying Liao, Jiayu Li, Weimin Liu, Lunxu Ann Med Infectious Diseases BACKGROUND: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19. METHOD: In this multicenter randomized (1:1) trial, patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 received either rSIFN-co nebulization or interferon-alpha nebulization added to baseline antiviral agents for no more than 28 days. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included the overall rate of clinical improvement assessed on day 28, the time to radiological improvement and virus nucleic acid negative conversion. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the safety set (46 patients assigned to rSIFN-co group, 48 to interferon-alpha group). The time to clinical improvement was 11.5 days versus 14.0 days (95% CI 1.10 to 2.81, p = .019); the overall rate of clinical improvement on day 28 was 93.5% versus 77.1% (difference, 16.4%; 95% CI 3% to 30%); the time to radiological improvement was 8.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .002), the time to virus nucleic acid negative conversion was 7.0 days versus 10.0 days (p = .018) in the rSIFN-co and interferon alpha arms, respectively. Adverse events were balanced with no deaths among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: rSIFN-co was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 when combined with baseline antiviral agents. rSIFN-co therapy alone or combined with other antiviral therapy is worth to be further studied. KEY MESSAGES: There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. Interferon alphas, by inducing both innate and adaptive immune responses, have shown clinical efficacy in treating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In this multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, clinical trial which included 94 participants with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the rSIFN-co plus antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) was associated with a shorter time of clinical improvement than interferon-alpha plus antiviral agents. Taylor & Francis 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7906612/ /pubmed/33620016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Li, Chuan Luo, Fengming Liu, Chengwu Xiong, Nian Xu, Zhihua Zhang, Wei Yang, Ming Wang, Ye Liu, Dan Yu, Chao Zeng, Jia Zhang, Li Li, Duo Liu, Yanbin Feng, Mei Liu, Ruoyang Mei, Jiandong Deng, Senyi Zeng, Zhen He, Yuanhong Liu, Haiyan Shi, Zhengyu Duan, Meng Kang, Deying Liao, Jiayu Li, Weimin Liu, Lunxu Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title | Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe covid-19: a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichuan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT luofengming effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liuchengwu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT xiongnian effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT xuzhihua effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT zhangwei effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT yangming effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT wangye effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liudan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT yuchao effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT zengjia effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT zhangli effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liduo effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liuyanbin effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT fengmei effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liuruoyang effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT meijiandong effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT dengsenyi effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT zengzhen effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT heyuanhong effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liuhaiyan effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT shizhengyu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT duanmeng effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kangdeying effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liaojiayu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liweimin effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial AT liulunxu effectofageneticallyengineeredinterferonalphaversustraditionalinterferonalphainthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecovid19arandomisedclinicaltrial |