Cargando…
Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32924568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360 |
_version_ | 1783655380215136256 |
---|---|
author | Danne, Thomas Axel Schweitzer, Matthias Keuthage, Winfried Kipper, Stefan Kretzschmar, Yasmin Simon, Jörg Wiedenmann, Tanja Ziegler, Ralph |
author_facet | Danne, Thomas Axel Schweitzer, Matthias Keuthage, Winfried Kipper, Stefan Kretzschmar, Yasmin Simon, Jörg Wiedenmann, Tanja Ziegler, Ralph |
author_sort | Danne, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with T1D (HbA(1c), 7.5%–9.5%) receiving multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin and using iscCGM within local healthcare settings for ≥6 months before switching to faster aspart at study start (week 0; baseline). Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Exploratory endpoint was change in iscCGM metrics from baseline to week 24. Results: Overall, 243 patients were included (55.6% male), with mean age/diabetes duration, 49.9/18.8 years; mean HbA(1c), 8.1%. By week 24, HbA(1c) had decreased by 0.19% (−2.1 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001) with no mean change in insulin doses or basal/bolus insulin ratios. For patients with sufficient available iscCGM data (n = 92): “time in range” (TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) increased from 46.9% to 50.1% (P = 0.01), corresponding to an increase of 46.1 min/day; time in hyperglycemia decreased from 49.1% to 46.1% (>10.0 mmol/L, P = 0.026) and 20.4% to 17.9% (>13.9 mmol/L, P = 0.013), corresponding to 43.5 (P = 0.024) and 35.6 (P = 0.015) fewer minutes per day on average spent in these ranges, respectively; no change for time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L). Mean interstitial and postprandial glucose improved from 10.4 to 10.1 mmol/L (P = 0.035) and 11.9 to 11.0 mmol/L (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusion: Real-world switching to faster aspart in adults with T1D on MDI improved HbA(1c), increased TIR, and decreased time in hyperglycemia without affecting time in hypoglycemia. The GoBolus study: NCT03450863. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7906866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79068662021-02-26 Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study Danne, Thomas Axel Schweitzer, Matthias Keuthage, Winfried Kipper, Stefan Kretzschmar, Yasmin Simon, Jörg Wiedenmann, Tanja Ziegler, Ralph Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with T1D (HbA(1c), 7.5%–9.5%) receiving multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin and using iscCGM within local healthcare settings for ≥6 months before switching to faster aspart at study start (week 0; baseline). Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Exploratory endpoint was change in iscCGM metrics from baseline to week 24. Results: Overall, 243 patients were included (55.6% male), with mean age/diabetes duration, 49.9/18.8 years; mean HbA(1c), 8.1%. By week 24, HbA(1c) had decreased by 0.19% (−2.1 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001) with no mean change in insulin doses or basal/bolus insulin ratios. For patients with sufficient available iscCGM data (n = 92): “time in range” (TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) increased from 46.9% to 50.1% (P = 0.01), corresponding to an increase of 46.1 min/day; time in hyperglycemia decreased from 49.1% to 46.1% (>10.0 mmol/L, P = 0.026) and 20.4% to 17.9% (>13.9 mmol/L, P = 0.013), corresponding to 43.5 (P = 0.024) and 35.6 (P = 0.015) fewer minutes per day on average spent in these ranges, respectively; no change for time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L). Mean interstitial and postprandial glucose improved from 10.4 to 10.1 mmol/L (P = 0.035) and 11.9 to 11.0 mmol/L (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusion: Real-world switching to faster aspart in adults with T1D on MDI improved HbA(1c), increased TIR, and decreased time in hyperglycemia without affecting time in hypoglycemia. The GoBolus study: NCT03450863. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-03-01 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7906866/ /pubmed/32924568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360 Text en © Thomas Danne, et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Danne, Thomas Axel Schweitzer, Matthias Keuthage, Winfried Kipper, Stefan Kretzschmar, Yasmin Simon, Jörg Wiedenmann, Tanja Ziegler, Ralph Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title | Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title_full | Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title_fullStr | Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title_short | Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study |
title_sort | impact of fast-acting insulin aspart on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring within a real-world setting: the gobolus study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32924568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dannethomas impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT axelschweitzermatthias impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT keuthagewinfried impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT kipperstefan impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT kretzschmaryasmin impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT simonjorg impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT wiedenmanntanja impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy AT zieglerralph impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy |