Cargando…

Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study

Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danne, Thomas, Axel Schweitzer, Matthias, Keuthage, Winfried, Kipper, Stefan, Kretzschmar, Yasmin, Simon, Jörg, Wiedenmann, Tanja, Ziegler, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32924568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360
_version_ 1783655380215136256
author Danne, Thomas
Axel Schweitzer, Matthias
Keuthage, Winfried
Kipper, Stefan
Kretzschmar, Yasmin
Simon, Jörg
Wiedenmann, Tanja
Ziegler, Ralph
author_facet Danne, Thomas
Axel Schweitzer, Matthias
Keuthage, Winfried
Kipper, Stefan
Kretzschmar, Yasmin
Simon, Jörg
Wiedenmann, Tanja
Ziegler, Ralph
author_sort Danne, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with T1D (HbA(1c), 7.5%–9.5%) receiving multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin and using iscCGM within local healthcare settings for ≥6 months before switching to faster aspart at study start (week 0; baseline). Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Exploratory endpoint was change in iscCGM metrics from baseline to week 24. Results: Overall, 243 patients were included (55.6% male), with mean age/diabetes duration, 49.9/18.8 years; mean HbA(1c), 8.1%. By week 24, HbA(1c) had decreased by 0.19% (−2.1 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001) with no mean change in insulin doses or basal/bolus insulin ratios. For patients with sufficient available iscCGM data (n = 92): “time in range” (TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) increased from 46.9% to 50.1% (P = 0.01), corresponding to an increase of 46.1 min/day; time in hyperglycemia decreased from 49.1% to 46.1% (>10.0 mmol/L, P = 0.026) and 20.4% to 17.9% (>13.9 mmol/L, P = 0.013), corresponding to 43.5 (P = 0.024) and 35.6 (P = 0.015) fewer minutes per day on average spent in these ranges, respectively; no change for time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L). Mean interstitial and postprandial glucose improved from 10.4 to 10.1 mmol/L (P = 0.035) and 11.9 to 11.0 mmol/L (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusion: Real-world switching to faster aspart in adults with T1D on MDI improved HbA(1c), increased TIR, and decreased time in hyperglycemia without affecting time in hypoglycemia. The GoBolus study: NCT03450863.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7906866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79068662021-02-26 Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study Danne, Thomas Axel Schweitzer, Matthias Keuthage, Winfried Kipper, Stefan Kretzschmar, Yasmin Simon, Jörg Wiedenmann, Tanja Ziegler, Ralph Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: The GoBolus study investigated the real-world effectiveness of faster aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) systems. Methods: This 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study investigated adults with T1D (HbA(1c), 7.5%–9.5%) receiving multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin and using iscCGM within local healthcare settings for ≥6 months before switching to faster aspart at study start (week 0; baseline). Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Exploratory endpoint was change in iscCGM metrics from baseline to week 24. Results: Overall, 243 patients were included (55.6% male), with mean age/diabetes duration, 49.9/18.8 years; mean HbA(1c), 8.1%. By week 24, HbA(1c) had decreased by 0.19% (−2.1 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001) with no mean change in insulin doses or basal/bolus insulin ratios. For patients with sufficient available iscCGM data (n = 92): “time in range” (TIR; 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) increased from 46.9% to 50.1% (P = 0.01), corresponding to an increase of 46.1 min/day; time in hyperglycemia decreased from 49.1% to 46.1% (>10.0 mmol/L, P = 0.026) and 20.4% to 17.9% (>13.9 mmol/L, P = 0.013), corresponding to 43.5 (P = 0.024) and 35.6 (P = 0.015) fewer minutes per day on average spent in these ranges, respectively; no change for time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L). Mean interstitial and postprandial glucose improved from 10.4 to 10.1 mmol/L (P = 0.035) and 11.9 to 11.0 mmol/L (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusion: Real-world switching to faster aspart in adults with T1D on MDI improved HbA(1c), increased TIR, and decreased time in hyperglycemia without affecting time in hypoglycemia. The GoBolus study: NCT03450863. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-03-01 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7906866/ /pubmed/32924568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360 Text en © Thomas Danne, et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Danne, Thomas
Axel Schweitzer, Matthias
Keuthage, Winfried
Kipper, Stefan
Kretzschmar, Yasmin
Simon, Jörg
Wiedenmann, Tanja
Ziegler, Ralph
Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title_full Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title_fullStr Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title_short Impact of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within a Real-World Setting: The GoBolus Study
title_sort impact of fast-acting insulin aspart on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring within a real-world setting: the gobolus study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32924568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0360
work_keys_str_mv AT dannethomas impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT axelschweitzermatthias impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT keuthagewinfried impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT kipperstefan impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT kretzschmaryasmin impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT simonjorg impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT wiedenmanntanja impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy
AT zieglerralph impactoffastactinginsulinaspartonglycemiccontrolinpatientswithtype1diabetesusingintermittentscanningcontinuousglucosemonitoringwithinarealworldsettingthegobolusstudy