Cargando…

Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems

BACKGROUND: Traditional East Asian Medical (TEAM) practice systems exhibit much variation. Little work has been done to study reasons for this variation. This essay explores cultural and historical explanations for how variety occurs by contrasting the use of two TEAM concepts in diagnosis in Chines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Birch, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100695
_version_ 1783655383738351616
author Birch, Stephen
author_facet Birch, Stephen
author_sort Birch, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional East Asian Medical (TEAM) practice systems exhibit much variation. Little work has been done to study reasons for this variation. This essay explores cultural and historical explanations for how variety occurs by contrasting the use of two TEAM concepts in diagnosis in Chinese and Japanese systems. METHODS: Focussing on two important concepts, xin (heart) and shen (spirit), a literature review is performed to contrast how they developed, are understood and used in diagnosis in Chinese Traditional Chinese medicine, TCM, and Japanese Meridian Therapy, MT. RESULTS: While TCM texts describe many heart-related diagnoses, MT texts do not describe any. While TCM associates ‘shen’ with the mind and emotions coupled with associated diagnoses, MT does neither. Historical and cultural reasons for these differences are identified. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, important questions arise about the nature of concepts and diagnoses in TEAM practice systems. They are not objective like biomedical constructs and diagnoses, nor are they clearly articulated and studied yet according to international standards. This suggests a range of research strategies that are needed. There are valid historical and cultural reasons for the differences we see between Japanese and Chinese TEAM systems. In light of these, further research is needed to elaborate and identify critical issues that are important for education, practice and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7906889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79068892021-03-03 Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems Birch, Stephen Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Traditional East Asian Medical (TEAM) practice systems exhibit much variation. Little work has been done to study reasons for this variation. This essay explores cultural and historical explanations for how variety occurs by contrasting the use of two TEAM concepts in diagnosis in Chinese and Japanese systems. METHODS: Focussing on two important concepts, xin (heart) and shen (spirit), a literature review is performed to contrast how they developed, are understood and used in diagnosis in Chinese Traditional Chinese medicine, TCM, and Japanese Meridian Therapy, MT. RESULTS: While TCM texts describe many heart-related diagnoses, MT texts do not describe any. While TCM associates ‘shen’ with the mind and emotions coupled with associated diagnoses, MT does neither. Historical and cultural reasons for these differences are identified. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, important questions arise about the nature of concepts and diagnoses in TEAM practice systems. They are not objective like biomedical constructs and diagnoses, nor are they clearly articulated and studied yet according to international standards. This suggests a range of research strategies that are needed. There are valid historical and cultural reasons for the differences we see between Japanese and Chinese TEAM systems. In light of these, further research is needed to elaborate and identify critical issues that are important for education, practice and research. Elsevier 2021-06 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7906889/ /pubmed/33665085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100695 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Birch, Stephen
Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title_full Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title_fullStr Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title_full_unstemmed Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title_short Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems
title_sort digging to the heart of things – an essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional east asian medicine: comparing chinese and japanese systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100695
work_keys_str_mv AT birchstephen diggingtotheheartofthingsanessayonpatternsofdiagnosisintraditionaleastasianmedicinecomparingchineseandjapanesesystems