Cargando…

Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks

Various types of neural networks are currently widely used in diverse technical applications, not least because neural networks are known to be able to “generalize.” The latter property raises expectations that they should be able to handle unexpected situations with similar success than humans. Usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stoop, Ruedi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.637389
_version_ 1783655443007012864
author Stoop, Ruedi
author_facet Stoop, Ruedi
author_sort Stoop, Ruedi
collection PubMed
description Various types of neural networks are currently widely used in diverse technical applications, not least because neural networks are known to be able to “generalize.” The latter property raises expectations that they should be able to handle unexpected situations with similar success than humans. Using fundamental examples, we show that in situations for which they have not been trained, artificial approaches tend to run into substantial problems, which highlights a deficit in comparisons to human abilities. For this problem–which seems to have obtained little attention so far–we provide a first analysis, based on simple examples, which exhibits some key features responsible for the difference between human and artificial intelligence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79071712021-02-27 Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks Stoop, Ruedi Front Physiol Physiology Various types of neural networks are currently widely used in diverse technical applications, not least because neural networks are known to be able to “generalize.” The latter property raises expectations that they should be able to handle unexpected situations with similar success than humans. Using fundamental examples, we show that in situations for which they have not been trained, artificial approaches tend to run into substantial problems, which highlights a deficit in comparisons to human abilities. For this problem–which seems to have obtained little attention so far–we provide a first analysis, based on simple examples, which exhibits some key features responsible for the difference between human and artificial intelligence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7907171/ /pubmed/33643075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.637389 Text en Copyright © 2021 Stoop. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Stoop, Ruedi
Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title_full Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title_fullStr Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title_short Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
title_sort note on the reliability of biological vs. artificial neural networks
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.637389
work_keys_str_mv AT stoopruedi noteonthereliabilityofbiologicalvsartificialneuralnetworks