Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)

BACKGROUND: Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is increasingly used. We investigated the feasibility of a new LISA-device (Neofact®) in neonates. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot study with open-label LISA in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: 20 infants with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maiwald, Christian Achim, Neuberger, Patrick, Franz, Axel R, Engel, Corinna, Vochem, Matthias, Poets, Christian F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319792
_version_ 1783655520070008832
author Maiwald, Christian Achim
Neuberger, Patrick
Franz, Axel R
Engel, Corinna
Vochem, Matthias
Poets, Christian F
author_facet Maiwald, Christian Achim
Neuberger, Patrick
Franz, Axel R
Engel, Corinna
Vochem, Matthias
Poets, Christian F
author_sort Maiwald, Christian Achim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is increasingly used. We investigated the feasibility of a new LISA-device (Neofact®) in neonates. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot study with open-label LISA in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: 20 infants with a gestational age of ≥26+0/7 weeks and an indication for LISA (Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)≥5 or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ≥0.30). Infants with respiratory tract malformations or unavailability of an instructed neonatologist were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success of LISA, defined as laryngoscopy-confirmed intratracheal catheter position or a decrease in FiO(2) by ≥0.05 or to 0.21, accompanied by an RSS decrease of ≥2; number of attempts needed for tracheal catheterisation. RESULTS: 20/57 screened infants were enrolled. Successful application occurred in 19/20 (95%). One application failed after three attempts. No device-related adverse events occurred. The median number of attempts was 2, success rate per attempt 19/31 (61%). CONCLUSION: LISA via Neofact® appears feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79075482021-03-11 Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) Maiwald, Christian Achim Neuberger, Patrick Franz, Axel R Engel, Corinna Vochem, Matthias Poets, Christian F Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Short Report BACKGROUND: Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is increasingly used. We investigated the feasibility of a new LISA-device (Neofact®) in neonates. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot study with open-label LISA in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: 20 infants with a gestational age of ≥26+0/7 weeks and an indication for LISA (Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)≥5 or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ≥0.30). Infants with respiratory tract malformations or unavailability of an instructed neonatologist were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success of LISA, defined as laryngoscopy-confirmed intratracheal catheter position or a decrease in FiO(2) by ≥0.05 or to 0.21, accompanied by an RSS decrease of ≥2; number of attempts needed for tracheal catheterisation. RESULTS: 20/57 screened infants were enrolled. Successful application occurred in 19/20 (95%). One application failed after three attempts. No device-related adverse events occurred. The median number of attempts was 2, success rate per attempt 19/31 (61%). CONCLUSION: LISA via Neofact® appears feasible. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7907548/ /pubmed/33023914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319792 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Report
Maiwald, Christian Achim
Neuberger, Patrick
Franz, Axel R
Engel, Corinna
Vochem, Matthias
Poets, Christian F
Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title_full Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title_short Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
title_sort clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (lisa)
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319792
work_keys_str_mv AT maiwaldchristianachim clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT neubergerpatrick clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT franzaxelr clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT engelcorinna clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT vochemmatthias clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT poetschristianf clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa
AT clinicalevaluationofanapplicationaidforlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationlisa