Cargando…
Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488 |
_version_ | 1783655521251753984 |
---|---|
author | Roper, Louise Lyttle, Mark D Gamble, Carrol Humphreys, Amy Messahel, Shrouk Lee, Elizabeth D Noblet, Joanne Hickey, Helen Rainford, Naomi Iyer, Anand Appleton, Richard Woolfall, Kerry |
author_facet | Roper, Louise Lyttle, Mark D Gamble, Carrol Humphreys, Amy Messahel, Shrouk Lee, Elizabeth D Noblet, Joanne Hickey, Helen Rainford, Naomi Iyer, Anand Appleton, Richard Woolfall, Kerry |
author_sort | Roper, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the trial. As part of an embedded study in the ‘Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children’ (EcLiPSE) trial, we explored how practitioners described the trial and RWPC during recruitment discussions, and how well this information was understood by parents. We aimed to develop a framework to assist trial conversations in future paediatric emergency and critical care trials using RWPC. METHODS: Qualitative methods embedded within the EcLiPSE trial processes, including audiorecorded practitioner–parent trial discussions and telephone interviews with parents. We analysed data using thematic analysis, drawing on the Realpe et al (2016) model for recruitment to trials. RESULTS: We analysed 76 recorded trial discussions and conducted 30 parent telephone interviews. For 19 parents, we had recorded trial discussion and interview data, which were matched for analysis. Parental understanding of the EcLiPSE trial was enhanced when practitioners: provided a comprehensive description of trial aims; explained the reasons for RWPC; discussed uncertainty about which intervention was best; provided a balanced description of trial intervention; provided a clear explanation about randomisation and provided an opportunity for questions. We present a seven-step framework to assist recruitment practice in trials involving RWPC. CONCLUSION: This study provides a framework to enhance recruitment practice and parental understanding in paediatric emergency and critical care trials involving RWPC. Further testing of this framework is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7907554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79075542021-03-11 Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials Roper, Louise Lyttle, Mark D Gamble, Carrol Humphreys, Amy Messahel, Shrouk Lee, Elizabeth D Noblet, Joanne Hickey, Helen Rainford, Naomi Iyer, Anand Appleton, Richard Woolfall, Kerry Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the trial. As part of an embedded study in the ‘Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children’ (EcLiPSE) trial, we explored how practitioners described the trial and RWPC during recruitment discussions, and how well this information was understood by parents. We aimed to develop a framework to assist trial conversations in future paediatric emergency and critical care trials using RWPC. METHODS: Qualitative methods embedded within the EcLiPSE trial processes, including audiorecorded practitioner–parent trial discussions and telephone interviews with parents. We analysed data using thematic analysis, drawing on the Realpe et al (2016) model for recruitment to trials. RESULTS: We analysed 76 recorded trial discussions and conducted 30 parent telephone interviews. For 19 parents, we had recorded trial discussion and interview data, which were matched for analysis. Parental understanding of the EcLiPSE trial was enhanced when practitioners: provided a comprehensive description of trial aims; explained the reasons for RWPC; discussed uncertainty about which intervention was best; provided a balanced description of trial intervention; provided a clear explanation about randomisation and provided an opportunity for questions. We present a seven-step framework to assist recruitment practice in trials involving RWPC. CONCLUSION: This study provides a framework to enhance recruitment practice and parental understanding in paediatric emergency and critical care trials involving RWPC. Further testing of this framework is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7907554/ /pubmed/32862140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Roper, Louise Lyttle, Mark D Gamble, Carrol Humphreys, Amy Messahel, Shrouk Lee, Elizabeth D Noblet, Joanne Hickey, Helen Rainford, Naomi Iyer, Anand Appleton, Richard Woolfall, Kerry Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title | Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title_full | Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title_fullStr | Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title_short | Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
title_sort | seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roperlouise sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT lyttlemarkd sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT gamblecarrol sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT humphreysamy sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT messahelshrouk sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT leeelizabethd sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT nobletjoanne sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT hickeyhelen sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT rainfordnaomi sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT iyeranand sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT appletonrichard sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials AT woolfallkerry sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials |