Cargando…

Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials

BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roper, Louise, Lyttle, Mark D, Gamble, Carrol, Humphreys, Amy, Messahel, Shrouk, Lee, Elizabeth D, Noblet, Joanne, Hickey, Helen, Rainford, Naomi, Iyer, Anand, Appleton, Richard, Woolfall, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488
_version_ 1783655521251753984
author Roper, Louise
Lyttle, Mark D
Gamble, Carrol
Humphreys, Amy
Messahel, Shrouk
Lee, Elizabeth D
Noblet, Joanne
Hickey, Helen
Rainford, Naomi
Iyer, Anand
Appleton, Richard
Woolfall, Kerry
author_facet Roper, Louise
Lyttle, Mark D
Gamble, Carrol
Humphreys, Amy
Messahel, Shrouk
Lee, Elizabeth D
Noblet, Joanne
Hickey, Helen
Rainford, Naomi
Iyer, Anand
Appleton, Richard
Woolfall, Kerry
author_sort Roper, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the trial. As part of an embedded study in the ‘Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children’ (EcLiPSE) trial, we explored how practitioners described the trial and RWPC during recruitment discussions, and how well this information was understood by parents. We aimed to develop a framework to assist trial conversations in future paediatric emergency and critical care trials using RWPC. METHODS: Qualitative methods embedded within the EcLiPSE trial processes, including audiorecorded practitioner–parent trial discussions and telephone interviews with parents. We analysed data using thematic analysis, drawing on the Realpe et al (2016) model for recruitment to trials. RESULTS: We analysed 76 recorded trial discussions and conducted 30 parent telephone interviews. For 19 parents, we had recorded trial discussion and interview data, which were matched for analysis. Parental understanding of the EcLiPSE trial was enhanced when practitioners: provided a comprehensive description of trial aims; explained the reasons for RWPC; discussed uncertainty about which intervention was best; provided a balanced description of trial intervention; provided a clear explanation about randomisation and provided an opportunity for questions. We present a seven-step framework to assist recruitment practice in trials involving RWPC. CONCLUSION: This study provides a framework to enhance recruitment practice and parental understanding in paediatric emergency and critical care trials involving RWPC. Further testing of this framework is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79075542021-03-11 Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials Roper, Louise Lyttle, Mark D Gamble, Carrol Humphreys, Amy Messahel, Shrouk Lee, Elizabeth D Noblet, Joanne Hickey, Helen Rainford, Naomi Iyer, Anand Appleton, Richard Woolfall, Kerry Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: Alternatives to prospective informed consent enable the conduct of paediatric emergency and critical care trials. Research without prior consent (RWPC) involves practitioners approaching parents after an intervention has been given and seeking consent for their child to continue in the trial. As part of an embedded study in the ‘Emergency treatment with Levetiracetam or Phenytoin in Status Epilepticus in children’ (EcLiPSE) trial, we explored how practitioners described the trial and RWPC during recruitment discussions, and how well this information was understood by parents. We aimed to develop a framework to assist trial conversations in future paediatric emergency and critical care trials using RWPC. METHODS: Qualitative methods embedded within the EcLiPSE trial processes, including audiorecorded practitioner–parent trial discussions and telephone interviews with parents. We analysed data using thematic analysis, drawing on the Realpe et al (2016) model for recruitment to trials. RESULTS: We analysed 76 recorded trial discussions and conducted 30 parent telephone interviews. For 19 parents, we had recorded trial discussion and interview data, which were matched for analysis. Parental understanding of the EcLiPSE trial was enhanced when practitioners: provided a comprehensive description of trial aims; explained the reasons for RWPC; discussed uncertainty about which intervention was best; provided a balanced description of trial intervention; provided a clear explanation about randomisation and provided an opportunity for questions. We present a seven-step framework to assist recruitment practice in trials involving RWPC. CONCLUSION: This study provides a framework to enhance recruitment practice and parental understanding in paediatric emergency and critical care trials involving RWPC. Further testing of this framework is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7907554/ /pubmed/32862140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Roper, Louise
Lyttle, Mark D
Gamble, Carrol
Humphreys, Amy
Messahel, Shrouk
Lee, Elizabeth D
Noblet, Joanne
Hickey, Helen
Rainford, Naomi
Iyer, Anand
Appleton, Richard
Woolfall, Kerry
Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title_full Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title_fullStr Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title_full_unstemmed Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title_short Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
title_sort seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209488
work_keys_str_mv AT roperlouise sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT lyttlemarkd sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT gamblecarrol sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT humphreysamy sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT messahelshrouk sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT leeelizabethd sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT nobletjoanne sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT hickeyhelen sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT rainfordnaomi sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT iyeranand sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT appletonrichard sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials
AT woolfallkerry sevenstepframeworktoenhancepractitionerexplanationsandparentalunderstandingsofresearchwithoutpriorconsentinpaediatricemergencyandcriticalcaretrials