Cargando…

Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation is a core skill of the emergency physician. Bolus administration of propofol is widely used in UK EDs. Titrated to an end point of sedation, it has a rapid effect but has been associated with adverse incidents. The use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, Fiona Marie, Lowe, David John, Millar, Jonathan, Corfield, Alasdair R, Watson, Malcolm J, Sim, Malcolm A B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209686
_version_ 1783655527363903488
author Burton, Fiona Marie
Lowe, David John
Millar, Jonathan
Corfield, Alasdair R
Watson, Malcolm J
Sim, Malcolm A B
author_facet Burton, Fiona Marie
Lowe, David John
Millar, Jonathan
Corfield, Alasdair R
Watson, Malcolm J
Sim, Malcolm A B
author_sort Burton, Fiona Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation is a core skill of the emergency physician. Bolus administration of propofol is widely used in UK EDs. Titrated to an end point of sedation, it has a rapid effect but has been associated with adverse incidents. The use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is not routine but may reduce the incidence of adverse incidents. The primary aims of this single-arm feasibility study were patient satisfaction and to establish recruitment rates for a randomised controlled trial comparing propofol TCI to bolus administration. METHODS: Four EDs in Scotland, UK, participated. Patients aged 18-65 years, with anterior shoulder dislocation, weight ≥ 50kg, fasted ≥ 90 min were screened. Patients underwent reduction of their dislocated shoulder using TCI propofol. The primary end point was patient satisfaction recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: Between 3 April 2017 and 31 December 2018, 25 patients were recruited with a recruitment rate of 20% for the 16-month recruitment window, with a temporary pause to allow amendment of drug dosage. Two patients were excluded. Twenty achieved adequate sedation, defined as a Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) 3. Successful reduction was achieved in all adequately sedated. Patient satisfaction was documented in 14 patients, mean±SD of 97±9 and time to sedation was 25±8 min. No adverse events were recorded using the Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia adverse event reporting tool. CONCLUSION: Propofol TCI was acceptable as a method of procedural sedation for patients. The lower than expected recruitment rates highlight the need for dedicated research support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03442803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79075792021-03-11 Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study Burton, Fiona Marie Lowe, David John Millar, Jonathan Corfield, Alasdair R Watson, Malcolm J Sim, Malcolm A B Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation is a core skill of the emergency physician. Bolus administration of propofol is widely used in UK EDs. Titrated to an end point of sedation, it has a rapid effect but has been associated with adverse incidents. The use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is not routine but may reduce the incidence of adverse incidents. The primary aims of this single-arm feasibility study were patient satisfaction and to establish recruitment rates for a randomised controlled trial comparing propofol TCI to bolus administration. METHODS: Four EDs in Scotland, UK, participated. Patients aged 18-65 years, with anterior shoulder dislocation, weight ≥ 50kg, fasted ≥ 90 min were screened. Patients underwent reduction of their dislocated shoulder using TCI propofol. The primary end point was patient satisfaction recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: Between 3 April 2017 and 31 December 2018, 25 patients were recruited with a recruitment rate of 20% for the 16-month recruitment window, with a temporary pause to allow amendment of drug dosage. Two patients were excluded. Twenty achieved adequate sedation, defined as a Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) 3. Successful reduction was achieved in all adequately sedated. Patient satisfaction was documented in 14 patients, mean±SD of 97±9 and time to sedation was 25±8 min. No adverse events were recorded using the Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia adverse event reporting tool. CONCLUSION: Propofol TCI was acceptable as a method of procedural sedation for patients. The lower than expected recruitment rates highlight the need for dedicated research support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03442803. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7907579/ /pubmed/33298604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209686 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Burton, Fiona Marie
Lowe, David John
Millar, Jonathan
Corfield, Alasdair R
Watson, Malcolm J
Sim, Malcolm A B
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title_full Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title_fullStr Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title_short Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
title_sort propofol target-controlled infusion in emergency department sedation (proteds): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209686
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonfionamarie propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT lowedavidjohn propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT millarjonathan propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT corfieldalasdairr propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT watsonmalcolmj propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy
AT simmalcolmab propofoltargetcontrolledinfusioninemergencydepartmentsedationprotedsamulticentresinglearmfeasibilitystudy