Cargando…

Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?

BACKGROUND: In most guidelines, upper rectal cancers (URC) are not recommended to take neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation. However, the definitions of URC vary greatly. Five definitions had been commonly used to define URC: 1) >10 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 2) >12 cm from the anal verge by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Xian Hua, Zhai, Bai Zhi, Li, Juan, Kabemba, Jean Luc Tshibangu, Gong, Hai Feng, Bai, Chen Guang, Liu, Ming Lu, Zhang, Shao Ting, Shen, Fu, Liu, Lian Jie, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625459
_version_ 1783655529480978432
author Gao, Xian Hua
Zhai, Bai Zhi
Li, Juan
Kabemba, Jean Luc Tshibangu
Gong, Hai Feng
Bai, Chen Guang
Liu, Ming Lu
Zhang, Shao Ting
Shen, Fu
Liu, Lian Jie
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Gao, Xian Hua
Zhai, Bai Zhi
Li, Juan
Kabemba, Jean Luc Tshibangu
Gong, Hai Feng
Bai, Chen Guang
Liu, Ming Lu
Zhang, Shao Ting
Shen, Fu
Liu, Lian Jie
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Gao, Xian Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In most guidelines, upper rectal cancers (URC) are not recommended to take neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation. However, the definitions of URC vary greatly. Five definitions had been commonly used to define URC: 1) >10 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 2) >12 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 3) >10 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 4) >12 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 5) above the anterior peritoneal reflection (APR). We hypothesized that the fifth definition is optimal to identify patients with rectal cancer to avoid adjuvant radiation. METHODS: The data of stage II/III rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without preoperative chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The height of the APR was measured, and compared with the tumor height measured by digital rectal examination (DRE), MRI and colonoscopy. The five definitions were compared in terms of prediction of local recurrence, survival, and percentages of patients requiring radiation. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were included, with the intraoperative location of 222 and 354 tumors being above and straddle/below the APR, respectively. The median distance of the APR from anal verge (height of APR) as measured by MRI was 8.7 (range: 4.5–14.3) cm. The height of APR positively correlated with body height (r=0.862, P<0.001). The accuracy of the MRI in determining the tumor location with respect to the APR was 92.1%. Rectal cancer above the APR had a significantly lower incidence of local recurrence than those straddle/below the APR (P=0.042). For those above the APR, there was no significant difference in local recurrence between the radiation and no-radiation group. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor location regarding APR was an independent risk factor for LRFS. Tumor height as measured by DRE, MRI and colonoscopy were not related with survival outcomes. Fewer rectal cancer patients required adjuvant radiation using the definition by the APR, compared with other four definitions based on a numerical tumor height measured by MRI and colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of URC as rectal tumor above the APR, might be the optimal definition to select patients with stage II/III rectal cancer to avoid postoperative adjuvant radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79075902021-02-27 Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation? Gao, Xian Hua Zhai, Bai Zhi Li, Juan Kabemba, Jean Luc Tshibangu Gong, Hai Feng Bai, Chen Guang Liu, Ming Lu Zhang, Shao Ting Shen, Fu Liu, Lian Jie Zhang, Wei Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: In most guidelines, upper rectal cancers (URC) are not recommended to take neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation. However, the definitions of URC vary greatly. Five definitions had been commonly used to define URC: 1) >10 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 2) >12 cm from the anal verge by MRI; 3) >10 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 4) >12 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy; 5) above the anterior peritoneal reflection (APR). We hypothesized that the fifth definition is optimal to identify patients with rectal cancer to avoid adjuvant radiation. METHODS: The data of stage II/III rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without preoperative chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The height of the APR was measured, and compared with the tumor height measured by digital rectal examination (DRE), MRI and colonoscopy. The five definitions were compared in terms of prediction of local recurrence, survival, and percentages of patients requiring radiation. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients were included, with the intraoperative location of 222 and 354 tumors being above and straddle/below the APR, respectively. The median distance of the APR from anal verge (height of APR) as measured by MRI was 8.7 (range: 4.5–14.3) cm. The height of APR positively correlated with body height (r=0.862, P<0.001). The accuracy of the MRI in determining the tumor location with respect to the APR was 92.1%. Rectal cancer above the APR had a significantly lower incidence of local recurrence than those straddle/below the APR (P=0.042). For those above the APR, there was no significant difference in local recurrence between the radiation and no-radiation group. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor location regarding APR was an independent risk factor for LRFS. Tumor height as measured by DRE, MRI and colonoscopy were not related with survival outcomes. Fewer rectal cancer patients required adjuvant radiation using the definition by the APR, compared with other four definitions based on a numerical tumor height measured by MRI and colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of URC as rectal tumor above the APR, might be the optimal definition to select patients with stage II/III rectal cancer to avoid postoperative adjuvant radiation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7907590/ /pubmed/33643920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625459 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gao, Zhai, Li, Kabemba, Gong, Bai, Liu, Zhang, Shen, Liu and Zhang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Gao, Xian Hua
Zhai, Bai Zhi
Li, Juan
Kabemba, Jean Luc Tshibangu
Gong, Hai Feng
Bai, Chen Guang
Liu, Ming Lu
Zhang, Shao Ting
Shen, Fu
Liu, Lian Jie
Zhang, Wei
Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title_full Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title_fullStr Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title_full_unstemmed Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title_short Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
title_sort which definition of upper rectal cancer is optimal in selecting stage ii or iii rectal cancer patients to avoid postoperative adjuvant radiation?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.625459
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoxianhua whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT zhaibaizhi whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT lijuan whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT kabembajeanluctshibangu whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT gonghaifeng whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT baichenguang whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT liuminglu whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT zhangshaoting whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT shenfu whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT liulianjie whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation
AT zhangwei whichdefinitionofupperrectalcancerisoptimalinselectingstageiioriiirectalcancerpatientstoavoidpostoperativeadjuvantradiation