Cargando…
A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1 |
_version_ | 1783655547325644800 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Wolf Karpinski, Katrin Backhaus, Luisa Bierke, Sebastian Häner, Martin |
author_facet | Petersen, Wolf Karpinski, Katrin Backhaus, Luisa Bierke, Sebastian Häner, Martin |
author_sort | Petersen, Wolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics. RESULTS: Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip). CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7907664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79076642021-02-26 A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics Petersen, Wolf Karpinski, Katrin Backhaus, Luisa Bierke, Sebastian Häner, Martin Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics. RESULTS: Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip). CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7907664/ /pubmed/33635399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Petersen, Wolf Karpinski, Katrin Backhaus, Luisa Bierke, Sebastian Häner, Martin A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title | A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title_full | A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title_fullStr | A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title_short | A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
title_sort | systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics |
topic | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersenwolf asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT karpinskikatrin asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT backhausluisa asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT bierkesebastian asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT hanermartin asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT petersenwolf systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT karpinskikatrin systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT backhausluisa systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT bierkesebastian systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics AT hanermartin systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics |