Cargando…

A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics

PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Wolf, Karpinski, Katrin, Backhaus, Luisa, Bierke, Sebastian, Häner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1
_version_ 1783655547325644800
author Petersen, Wolf
Karpinski, Katrin
Backhaus, Luisa
Bierke, Sebastian
Häner, Martin
author_facet Petersen, Wolf
Karpinski, Katrin
Backhaus, Luisa
Bierke, Sebastian
Häner, Martin
author_sort Petersen, Wolf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics. RESULTS: Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip). CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79076642021-02-26 A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics Petersen, Wolf Karpinski, Katrin Backhaus, Luisa Bierke, Sebastian Häner, Martin Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine PURPOSE: Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics. RESULTS: Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip). CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7907664/ /pubmed/33635399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Petersen, Wolf
Karpinski, Katrin
Backhaus, Luisa
Bierke, Sebastian
Häner, Martin
A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title_full A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title_fullStr A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title_short A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
title_sort systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics
topic Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03788-1
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenwolf asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT karpinskikatrin asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT backhausluisa asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT bierkesebastian asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT hanermartin asystematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT petersenwolf systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT karpinskikatrin systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT backhausluisa systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT bierkesebastian systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics
AT hanermartin systematicreviewabouttelemedicineinorthopedics