Cargando…
Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reacti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598 |
_version_ | 1783655581691674624 |
---|---|
author | Fergusson, Dean A Chassé, Michael Tinmouth, Alan Acker, Jason P English, Shane Forster, Alan J Hawken, Steven Shehata, Nadine Thavorn, Kednapa Wilson, Kumanan Tuttle, Angie Perelman, Iris Cober, Nancy Maddison, Heather Tokessy, Melanie |
author_facet | Fergusson, Dean A Chassé, Michael Tinmouth, Alan Acker, Jason P English, Shane Forster, Alan J Hawken, Steven Shehata, Nadine Thavorn, Kednapa Wilson, Kumanan Tuttle, Angie Perelman, Iris Cober, Nancy Maddison, Heather Tokessy, Melanie |
author_sort | Fergusson, Dean A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03344887; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7907852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79078522021-03-09 Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol Fergusson, Dean A Chassé, Michael Tinmouth, Alan Acker, Jason P English, Shane Forster, Alan J Hawken, Steven Shehata, Nadine Thavorn, Kednapa Wilson, Kumanan Tuttle, Angie Perelman, Iris Cober, Nancy Maddison, Heather Tokessy, Melanie BMJ Open Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03344887; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7907852/ /pubmed/33622960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) Fergusson, Dean A Chassé, Michael Tinmouth, Alan Acker, Jason P English, Shane Forster, Alan J Hawken, Steven Shehata, Nadine Thavorn, Kednapa Wilson, Kumanan Tuttle, Angie Perelman, Iris Cober, Nancy Maddison, Heather Tokessy, Melanie Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title | Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title_full | Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title_fullStr | Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title_short | Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol |
title_sort | pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative trial assessing donor sex (itads) protocol |
topic | Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergussondeana pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT chassemichael pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT tinmouthalan pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT ackerjasonp pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT englishshane pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT forsteralanj pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT hawkensteven pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT shehatanadine pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT thavornkednapa pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT wilsonkumanan pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT tuttleangie pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT perelmaniris pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT cobernancy pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT maddisonheather pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol AT tokessymelanie pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol |