Cargando…

Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol

INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fergusson, Dean A, Chassé, Michael, Tinmouth, Alan, Acker, Jason P, English, Shane, Forster, Alan J, Hawken, Steven, Shehata, Nadine, Thavorn, Kednapa, Wilson, Kumanan, Tuttle, Angie, Perelman, Iris, Cober, Nancy, Maddison, Heather, Tokessy, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598
_version_ 1783655581691674624
author Fergusson, Dean A
Chassé, Michael
Tinmouth, Alan
Acker, Jason P
English, Shane
Forster, Alan J
Hawken, Steven
Shehata, Nadine
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wilson, Kumanan
Tuttle, Angie
Perelman, Iris
Cober, Nancy
Maddison, Heather
Tokessy, Melanie
author_facet Fergusson, Dean A
Chassé, Michael
Tinmouth, Alan
Acker, Jason P
English, Shane
Forster, Alan J
Hawken, Steven
Shehata, Nadine
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wilson, Kumanan
Tuttle, Angie
Perelman, Iris
Cober, Nancy
Maddison, Heather
Tokessy, Melanie
author_sort Fergusson, Dean A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03344887; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79078522021-03-09 Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol Fergusson, Dean A Chassé, Michael Tinmouth, Alan Acker, Jason P English, Shane Forster, Alan J Hawken, Steven Shehata, Nadine Thavorn, Kednapa Wilson, Kumanan Tuttle, Angie Perelman, Iris Cober, Nancy Maddison, Heather Tokessy, Melanie BMJ Open Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) INTRODUCTION: With over 1 million units of blood transfused each year in Canada, their use has a significant clinical and economic impact on our health system. Adequate screening of blood donors is important to ensure the safety and clinical benefit of blood products. Some adverse transfusion reactions have been shown to be related to donor factors (eg, lung injury), whereas other adverse outcomes have been theoretically related to donor factors (mortality and infection). Our clinical trial will test whether male donor blood leads to a greater benefit for transfusion recipients compared with female donor blood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have designed a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial that will allocate transfusion recipients to receive either male-only or female-only donor transfusions. We will enrol 8850 adult patients requiring at least one transfusion at four sites over an approximate 2-year period. Randomisation and allocation will occur in the blood bank prior to release of the units of blood for transfusion. Our primary outcome is mortality. An intent-to-treat analysis will be applied using all randomised and transfused patients. The principal analysis will be a survival analysis comparing the time from randomisation to death between patients allocated to male donor red blood cells (RBCs) and female donor RBCs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from research ethics boards of all involved institutions, as well as from privacy offices of Canadian Blood Services, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science and The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03344887; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7907852/ /pubmed/33622960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
Fergusson, Dean A
Chassé, Michael
Tinmouth, Alan
Acker, Jason P
English, Shane
Forster, Alan J
Hawken, Steven
Shehata, Nadine
Thavorn, Kednapa
Wilson, Kumanan
Tuttle, Angie
Perelman, Iris
Cober, Nancy
Maddison, Heather
Tokessy, Melanie
Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title_full Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title_fullStr Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title_short Pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative Trial Assessing Donor Sex (iTADS) protocol
title_sort pragmatic, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the impact of red blood cell donor sex on recipient mortality in an academic hospital population: the innovative trial assessing donor sex (itads) protocol
topic Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049598
work_keys_str_mv AT fergussondeana pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT chassemichael pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT tinmouthalan pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT ackerjasonp pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT englishshane pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT forsteralanj pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT hawkensteven pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT shehatanadine pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT thavornkednapa pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT wilsonkumanan pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT tuttleangie pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT perelmaniris pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT cobernancy pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT maddisonheather pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol
AT tokessymelanie pragmaticdoubleblindrandomisedtrialevaluatingtheimpactofredbloodcelldonorsexonrecipientmortalityinanacademichospitalpopulationtheinnovativetrialassessingdonorsexitadsprotocol