Cargando…

Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model

BACKGROUND: Prior to 2017, internal medicine (IM) residents at the University of Alberta did not have a standardised quality improvement (QI) educational curriculum. Our goal was to use QI principles to develop a resident sustained curriculum using the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Caitlyn, Mathura, Pamela, Ip, Shannon, Kassam, Narmin, Tapardel, Anca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001067
_version_ 1783655585233764352
author Collins, Caitlyn
Mathura, Pamela
Ip, Shannon
Kassam, Narmin
Tapardel, Anca
author_facet Collins, Caitlyn
Mathura, Pamela
Ip, Shannon
Kassam, Narmin
Tapardel, Anca
author_sort Collins, Caitlyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior to 2017, internal medicine (IM) residents at the University of Alberta did not have a standardised quality improvement (QI) educational curriculum. Our goal was to use QI principles to develop a resident sustained curriculum using the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) training course. METHODS: Three one-year Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted. The EPIQ course was delivered to postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 residents (n=110, PDSA 1) in 2017, PGY-1 residents (n=27, PDSA 2) in 2018 and PGY-1 residents (n=28, PDSA 3) in 2019. Trained residents were recruited as facilitators for PDSA 2 and 3. Residents worked through potential QI projects that were later presented for evaluation. Precourse and postcourse surveys and tests were conducted to assess knowledge acquisition and curriculum satisfaction. Process, outcome and balancing measures were also evaluated. RESULTS: In PDSA 1, 98% felt they had acquired understanding of QI principles (56% increase), 94% of PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents preferred this QI curriculum compared with previous training, and 65% of residents expressed interest in pursuing a QI project (15% increase). In PDSA 2, tests scores of QI principles improved from 77.6% to 80%, and 40% of residents expressed interest in becoming a course facilitator. In PDSA 3, self-rated confidence with QI methodology improved from 53% to 75%. A total of 165 residents completed EPIQ training and 11 residents became course facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Having a structured QI curriculum and working through practical QI projects provided valuable QI training for residents. Feedback was positive, and with each PDSA cycle there was increased resident interest in QI. Developing this curriculum using validated QI tools highlighted areas of change opportunity thereby enhancing acceptance. As more cycles of EPIQ are delivered and more residents become facilitators, it is our aim to have this curriculum sustained by future residents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79078742021-03-09 Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model Collins, Caitlyn Mathura, Pamela Ip, Shannon Kassam, Narmin Tapardel, Anca BMJ Open Qual Quality Education Report BACKGROUND: Prior to 2017, internal medicine (IM) residents at the University of Alberta did not have a standardised quality improvement (QI) educational curriculum. Our goal was to use QI principles to develop a resident sustained curriculum using the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) training course. METHODS: Three one-year Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted. The EPIQ course was delivered to postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 residents (n=110, PDSA 1) in 2017, PGY-1 residents (n=27, PDSA 2) in 2018 and PGY-1 residents (n=28, PDSA 3) in 2019. Trained residents were recruited as facilitators for PDSA 2 and 3. Residents worked through potential QI projects that were later presented for evaluation. Precourse and postcourse surveys and tests were conducted to assess knowledge acquisition and curriculum satisfaction. Process, outcome and balancing measures were also evaluated. RESULTS: In PDSA 1, 98% felt they had acquired understanding of QI principles (56% increase), 94% of PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents preferred this QI curriculum compared with previous training, and 65% of residents expressed interest in pursuing a QI project (15% increase). In PDSA 2, tests scores of QI principles improved from 77.6% to 80%, and 40% of residents expressed interest in becoming a course facilitator. In PDSA 3, self-rated confidence with QI methodology improved from 53% to 75%. A total of 165 residents completed EPIQ training and 11 residents became course facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Having a structured QI curriculum and working through practical QI projects provided valuable QI training for residents. Feedback was positive, and with each PDSA cycle there was increased resident interest in QI. Developing this curriculum using validated QI tools highlighted areas of change opportunity thereby enhancing acceptance. As more cycles of EPIQ are delivered and more residents become facilitators, it is our aim to have this curriculum sustained by future residents. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7907874/ /pubmed/33622850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001067 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Education Report
Collins, Caitlyn
Mathura, Pamela
Ip, Shannon
Kassam, Narmin
Tapardel, Anca
Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title_full Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title_fullStr Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title_full_unstemmed Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title_short Applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (QI) educational model
title_sort applying improvement science to establish a resident sustained quality improvement (qi) educational model
topic Quality Education Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001067
work_keys_str_mv AT collinscaitlyn applyingimprovementsciencetoestablisharesidentsustainedqualityimprovementqieducationalmodel
AT mathurapamela applyingimprovementsciencetoestablisharesidentsustainedqualityimprovementqieducationalmodel
AT ipshannon applyingimprovementsciencetoestablisharesidentsustainedqualityimprovementqieducationalmodel
AT kassamnarmin applyingimprovementsciencetoestablisharesidentsustainedqualityimprovementqieducationalmodel
AT tapardelanca applyingimprovementsciencetoestablisharesidentsustainedqualityimprovementqieducationalmodel