Cargando…

Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science

The disappointing results in bench-to-bedside translation of neuroprotective strategies caused a certain shift in stroke research towards enhancing the endogenous recovery potential of the brain. One reason for this focus on recovery is the much wider time window for therapeutic interventions which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sommer, Clemens J, Schäbitz, Wolf-Rüdiger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20970048
_version_ 1783655612277587968
author Sommer, Clemens J
Schäbitz, Wolf-Rüdiger
author_facet Sommer, Clemens J
Schäbitz, Wolf-Rüdiger
author_sort Sommer, Clemens J
collection PubMed
description The disappointing results in bench-to-bedside translation of neuroprotective strategies caused a certain shift in stroke research towards enhancing the endogenous recovery potential of the brain. One reason for this focus on recovery is the much wider time window for therapeutic interventions which is open for at least several months. Since recently two large clinical studies using d-amphetamine or fluoxetine, respectively, to enhance post-stroke neurological outcome failed again it is a good time for a critical reflection on principles and requirements for stroke recovery science. In principal, stroke recovery science deals with all events from the molecular up to the functional and behavioral level occurring after brain ischemia eventually ending up with any measurable improvement of various clinical parameters. A detailed knowledge of the spontaneously occurring post-ischemic regeneration processes is the indispensable prerequisite for any therapeutic approaches aiming to modify these responses to enhance post-stroke recovery. This review will briefly illuminate the molecular mechanisms of post-ischemic regeneration and the principle possibilities to foster post-stroke recovery. In this context, recent translational approaches are analyzed. Finally, the principal and specific requirements and pitfalls in stroke recovery research as well as potential explanations for translational failures will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7907998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79079982021-03-11 Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science Sommer, Clemens J Schäbitz, Wolf-Rüdiger J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Review Articles The disappointing results in bench-to-bedside translation of neuroprotective strategies caused a certain shift in stroke research towards enhancing the endogenous recovery potential of the brain. One reason for this focus on recovery is the much wider time window for therapeutic interventions which is open for at least several months. Since recently two large clinical studies using d-amphetamine or fluoxetine, respectively, to enhance post-stroke neurological outcome failed again it is a good time for a critical reflection on principles and requirements for stroke recovery science. In principal, stroke recovery science deals with all events from the molecular up to the functional and behavioral level occurring after brain ischemia eventually ending up with any measurable improvement of various clinical parameters. A detailed knowledge of the spontaneously occurring post-ischemic regeneration processes is the indispensable prerequisite for any therapeutic approaches aiming to modify these responses to enhance post-stroke recovery. This review will briefly illuminate the molecular mechanisms of post-ischemic regeneration and the principle possibilities to foster post-stroke recovery. In this context, recent translational approaches are analyzed. Finally, the principal and specific requirements and pitfalls in stroke recovery research as well as potential explanations for translational failures will be discussed. SAGE Publications 2020-11-11 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7907998/ /pubmed/33175596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20970048 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Sommer, Clemens J
Schäbitz, Wolf-Rüdiger
Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title_full Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title_fullStr Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title_full_unstemmed Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title_short Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
title_sort principles and requirements for stroke recovery science
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20970048
work_keys_str_mv AT sommerclemensj principlesandrequirementsforstrokerecoveryscience
AT schabitzwolfrudiger principlesandrequirementsforstrokerecoveryscience