Cargando…
Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994 |
_version_ | 1783655626695507968 |
---|---|
author | Backer, Jantien A Mollema, Liesbeth Vos, Eric RA Klinkenberg, Don van der Klis, Fiona RM de Melker, Hester E van den Hof, Susan Wallinga, Jacco |
author_facet | Backer, Jantien A Mollema, Liesbeth Vos, Eric RA Klinkenberg, Don van der Klis, Fiona RM de Melker, Hester E van den Hof, Susan Wallinga, Jacco |
author_sort | Backer, Jantien A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Netherlands in 2016–17, in which participants reported the number and age of their contacts the previous day. The survey was repeated among a subsample of the participants in April 2020, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and in an extended sample in June 2020, after some measures were relaxed. RESULTS: The average number of community contacts per day was reduced from 14.9 (interquartile range (IQR): 4–20) in the 2016–17 survey to 3.5 (IQR: 0–4) after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and rebounded to 8.8 (IQR: 1–10) after some measures were relaxed. All age groups restricted their community contacts to at most 5, on average, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented. In children, the number of community contacts reverted to baseline levels after measures were eased, while individuals aged 70 years and older had less than half their baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Strict physical distancing measures greatly reduced overall contact numbers, which likely contributed to curbing the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. However, age groups reacted differently when measures were relaxed, with children reverting to normal contact numbers and elderly individuals maintaining restricted contact numbers. These findings offer guidance for age-targeted measures in future waves of the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7908067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79080672021-03-04 Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 Backer, Jantien A Mollema, Liesbeth Vos, Eric RA Klinkenberg, Don van der Klis, Fiona RM de Melker, Hester E van den Hof, Susan Wallinga, Jacco Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Netherlands in 2016–17, in which participants reported the number and age of their contacts the previous day. The survey was repeated among a subsample of the participants in April 2020, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and in an extended sample in June 2020, after some measures were relaxed. RESULTS: The average number of community contacts per day was reduced from 14.9 (interquartile range (IQR): 4–20) in the 2016–17 survey to 3.5 (IQR: 0–4) after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and rebounded to 8.8 (IQR: 1–10) after some measures were relaxed. All age groups restricted their community contacts to at most 5, on average, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented. In children, the number of community contacts reverted to baseline levels after measures were eased, while individuals aged 70 years and older had less than half their baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Strict physical distancing measures greatly reduced overall contact numbers, which likely contributed to curbing the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. However, age groups reacted differently when measures were relaxed, with children reverting to normal contact numbers and elderly individuals maintaining restricted contact numbers. These findings offer guidance for age-targeted measures in future waves of the pandemic. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7908067/ /pubmed/33632374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Backer, Jantien A Mollema, Liesbeth Vos, Eric RA Klinkenberg, Don van der Klis, Fiona RM de Melker, Hester E van den Hof, Susan Wallinga, Jacco Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title | Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title_full | Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title_fullStr | Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title_short | Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 |
title_sort | impact of physical distancing measures against covid-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the netherlands, 2016–17, april 2020 and june 2020 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT backerjantiena impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT mollemaliesbeth impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT vosericra impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT klinkenbergdon impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT vanderklisfionarm impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT demelkerhestere impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT vandenhofsusan impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 AT wallingajacco impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020 |