Cargando…

Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backer, Jantien A, Mollema, Liesbeth, Vos, Eric RA, Klinkenberg, Don, van der Klis, Fiona RM, de Melker, Hester E, van den Hof, Susan, Wallinga, Jacco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632374
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994
_version_ 1783655626695507968
author Backer, Jantien A
Mollema, Liesbeth
Vos, Eric RA
Klinkenberg, Don
van der Klis, Fiona RM
de Melker, Hester E
van den Hof, Susan
Wallinga, Jacco
author_facet Backer, Jantien A
Mollema, Liesbeth
Vos, Eric RA
Klinkenberg, Don
van der Klis, Fiona RM
de Melker, Hester E
van den Hof, Susan
Wallinga, Jacco
author_sort Backer, Jantien A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Netherlands in 2016–17, in which participants reported the number and age of their contacts the previous day. The survey was repeated among a subsample of the participants in April 2020, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and in an extended sample in June 2020, after some measures were relaxed. RESULTS: The average number of community contacts per day was reduced from 14.9 (interquartile range (IQR): 4–20) in the 2016–17 survey to 3.5 (IQR: 0–4) after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and rebounded to 8.8 (IQR: 1–10) after some measures were relaxed. All age groups restricted their community contacts to at most 5, on average, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented. In children, the number of community contacts reverted to baseline levels after measures were eased, while individuals aged 70 years and older had less than half their baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Strict physical distancing measures greatly reduced overall contact numbers, which likely contributed to curbing the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. However, age groups reacted differently when measures were relaxed, with children reverting to normal contact numbers and elderly individuals maintaining restricted contact numbers. These findings offer guidance for age-targeted measures in future waves of the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79080672021-03-04 Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020 Backer, Jantien A Mollema, Liesbeth Vos, Eric RA Klinkenberg, Don van der Klis, Fiona RM de Melker, Hester E van den Hof, Susan Wallinga, Jacco Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented physical distancing measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. AIM: To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Netherlands in 2016–17, in which participants reported the number and age of their contacts the previous day. The survey was repeated among a subsample of the participants in April 2020, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and in an extended sample in June 2020, after some measures were relaxed. RESULTS: The average number of community contacts per day was reduced from 14.9 (interquartile range (IQR): 4–20) in the 2016–17 survey to 3.5 (IQR: 0–4) after strict physical distancing measures were implemented, and rebounded to 8.8 (IQR: 1–10) after some measures were relaxed. All age groups restricted their community contacts to at most 5, on average, after strict physical distancing measures were implemented. In children, the number of community contacts reverted to baseline levels after measures were eased, while individuals aged 70 years and older had less than half their baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Strict physical distancing measures greatly reduced overall contact numbers, which likely contributed to curbing the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. However, age groups reacted differently when measures were relaxed, with children reverting to normal contact numbers and elderly individuals maintaining restricted contact numbers. These findings offer guidance for age-targeted measures in future waves of the pandemic. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7908067/ /pubmed/33632374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Backer, Jantien A
Mollema, Liesbeth
Vos, Eric RA
Klinkenberg, Don
van der Klis, Fiona RM
de Melker, Hester E
van den Hof, Susan
Wallinga, Jacco
Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title_full Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title_fullStr Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title_full_unstemmed Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title_short Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016–17, April 2020 and June 2020
title_sort impact of physical distancing measures against covid-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the netherlands, 2016–17, april 2020 and june 2020
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632374
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994
work_keys_str_mv AT backerjantiena impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT mollemaliesbeth impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT vosericra impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT klinkenbergdon impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT vanderklisfionarm impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT demelkerhestere impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT vandenhofsusan impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020
AT wallingajacco impactofphysicaldistancingmeasuresagainstcovid19oncontactsandmixingpatternsrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysthenetherlands201617april2020andjune2020