Cargando…

Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal

Agricultural wastes used as denitrification carbon sources have some drawbacks such as excessive organic carbon release and unclear release characteristics of nitrogen, phosphorus, and chromatic substances, which can cause adverse effects on the effluent quality during the denitrification process. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, Yu, Yan, Guokai, Wang, Haiyan, Dong, Weiyang, Wang, Huan, Chang, Yang, Chang, Ming, Li, Congyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031232
_version_ 1783655678666080256
author Ling, Yu
Yan, Guokai
Wang, Haiyan
Dong, Weiyang
Wang, Huan
Chang, Yang
Chang, Ming
Li, Congyu
author_facet Ling, Yu
Yan, Guokai
Wang, Haiyan
Dong, Weiyang
Wang, Huan
Chang, Yang
Chang, Ming
Li, Congyu
author_sort Ling, Yu
collection PubMed
description Agricultural wastes used as denitrification carbon sources have some drawbacks such as excessive organic carbon release and unclear release characteristics of nitrogen, phosphorus, and chromatic substances, which can cause adverse effects on the effluent quality during the denitrification process. The composition and surface characteristics, carbon release mechanisms, and secondary pollutant release properties of six kinds of agricultural wastes, i.e., rice straw (RS), wheat straw (WS), corn stalk (CS), corncob (CC), soybean stalk (SS), and soybean hull (SH) were studied and analyzed in this research. The denitrification performance of these agricultural wastes was also investigated extensively by batch experiments. The results showed that the carbon release basically followed the second-order reaction kinetic equation and Ritger–Peppas equation in the 120 h reaction, and it was mainly controlled by the diffusion process. The kinetic equation fitting results and bioavailability test suggested that the potential risk of excessive effluent COD of CC was the lowest due to the appropriate amount and degradability of its released carbon. The NH(4)(+)-N, TN, and TP in the leachate of RS were higher than those of the other five agriculture wastes, and the chroma in the leachate of WS and CS was heavier than that of the others. CC released the lowest pollutants, which resulted in slight fluctuations of effluent quality in the start-up period (1–11 d), and it had the best nitrogen removal capacity in the denitrification experiment. The average NO(3)(−)-N removal of CC was 5.12 mg for each batch in the stable period (11–27 d), which was higher than that of others, and less NO(2)(−)-N, NH(4)(+)-N, and COD were accumulated in the CC effluent during the whole denitrification process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79082892021-02-27 Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal Ling, Yu Yan, Guokai Wang, Haiyan Dong, Weiyang Wang, Huan Chang, Yang Chang, Ming Li, Congyu Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Agricultural wastes used as denitrification carbon sources have some drawbacks such as excessive organic carbon release and unclear release characteristics of nitrogen, phosphorus, and chromatic substances, which can cause adverse effects on the effluent quality during the denitrification process. The composition and surface characteristics, carbon release mechanisms, and secondary pollutant release properties of six kinds of agricultural wastes, i.e., rice straw (RS), wheat straw (WS), corn stalk (CS), corncob (CC), soybean stalk (SS), and soybean hull (SH) were studied and analyzed in this research. The denitrification performance of these agricultural wastes was also investigated extensively by batch experiments. The results showed that the carbon release basically followed the second-order reaction kinetic equation and Ritger–Peppas equation in the 120 h reaction, and it was mainly controlled by the diffusion process. The kinetic equation fitting results and bioavailability test suggested that the potential risk of excessive effluent COD of CC was the lowest due to the appropriate amount and degradability of its released carbon. The NH(4)(+)-N, TN, and TP in the leachate of RS were higher than those of the other five agriculture wastes, and the chroma in the leachate of WS and CS was heavier than that of the others. CC released the lowest pollutants, which resulted in slight fluctuations of effluent quality in the start-up period (1–11 d), and it had the best nitrogen removal capacity in the denitrification experiment. The average NO(3)(−)-N removal of CC was 5.12 mg for each batch in the stable period (11–27 d), which was higher than that of others, and less NO(2)(−)-N, NH(4)(+)-N, and COD were accumulated in the CC effluent during the whole denitrification process. MDPI 2021-01-29 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7908289/ /pubmed/33573097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031232 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ling, Yu
Yan, Guokai
Wang, Haiyan
Dong, Weiyang
Wang, Huan
Chang, Yang
Chang, Ming
Li, Congyu
Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title_full Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title_fullStr Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title_full_unstemmed Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title_short Release Mechanism, Secondary Pollutants and Denitrification Performance Comparison of Six Kinds of Agricultural Wastes as Solid Carbon Sources for Nitrate Removal
title_sort release mechanism, secondary pollutants and denitrification performance comparison of six kinds of agricultural wastes as solid carbon sources for nitrate removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031232
work_keys_str_mv AT lingyu releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT yanguokai releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT wanghaiyan releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT dongweiyang releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT wanghuan releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT changyang releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT changming releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval
AT licongyu releasemechanismsecondarypollutantsanddenitrificationperformancecomparisonofsixkindsofagriculturalwastesassolidcarbonsourcesfornitrateremoval