Cargando…

Care homes education: what can we learn?

Medical care received by care home residents can be variable. Initiatives, such as matron-led community teams, ensure a timely response to alerts about unwell residents. But early recognition of deterioration is vital in accessing this help. The aim of this project was to design and deliver an educa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Sarah Frances, Gluck, Tim, Gorringe, Anna, Stork, Annie, Jowett, Sally, Nadicksbernd, J J, Salt, Matthew, Bradley, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001153
_version_ 1783655681560150016
author Armstrong, Sarah Frances
Gluck, Tim
Gorringe, Anna
Stork, Annie
Jowett, Sally
Nadicksbernd, J J
Salt, Matthew
Bradley, Kelly
author_facet Armstrong, Sarah Frances
Gluck, Tim
Gorringe, Anna
Stork, Annie
Jowett, Sally
Nadicksbernd, J J
Salt, Matthew
Bradley, Kelly
author_sort Armstrong, Sarah Frances
collection PubMed
description Medical care received by care home residents can be variable. Initiatives, such as matron-led community teams, ensure a timely response to alerts about unwell residents. But early recognition of deterioration is vital in accessing this help. The aim of this project was to design and deliver an education programme for carers. It was hypothesised that the implementation of a teaching programme may result in improved medical care for residents. By understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing teaching, we hoped to identify the components of a successful teaching programme. Four care homes in Enfield received training on topics such as deterioration recognition over a 1-year period. The project was evaluated at 3, 6 and 9 months. Each evaluation comprised: pre-and-post-teaching questionnaires, focus groups, analysis of percentages of staff trained, review of overall and potentially avoidable, hospital admission rates. A Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle structure was used. The programme was well-received by carers, who gave examples of application of learning. Modules about conditions frequently resulting in hospital admission, or concerning real cases, demonstrated the best pre-and-post lesson change scores. However, the reach of the programme was low, with attendance rates between 5% and 28%. Overall, the percentage of staff trained in deterioration recognition ranged from 35% (care home one) to 12% (care home three). Hospital admissions reduced from 37 hospital admissions to 20 over the duration of the project. Potentially avoidable admissions reduced from 16 to 5. Proving causality to the intervention was difficult. Factors facilitating delivery of training included a flexible approach, an activity-based curriculum, alignment of topics with real cases and embedding key messages in every tutorial. Barriers included: time pressures, shift work, low attendance rates, inequitable perception of the value of teaching and IT issues. Care home factors impacting on delivery included: stability of management and internal communication systems. please ensure space here
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79083012021-03-11 Care homes education: what can we learn? Armstrong, Sarah Frances Gluck, Tim Gorringe, Anna Stork, Annie Jowett, Sally Nadicksbernd, J J Salt, Matthew Bradley, Kelly BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report Medical care received by care home residents can be variable. Initiatives, such as matron-led community teams, ensure a timely response to alerts about unwell residents. But early recognition of deterioration is vital in accessing this help. The aim of this project was to design and deliver an education programme for carers. It was hypothesised that the implementation of a teaching programme may result in improved medical care for residents. By understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing teaching, we hoped to identify the components of a successful teaching programme. Four care homes in Enfield received training on topics such as deterioration recognition over a 1-year period. The project was evaluated at 3, 6 and 9 months. Each evaluation comprised: pre-and-post-teaching questionnaires, focus groups, analysis of percentages of staff trained, review of overall and potentially avoidable, hospital admission rates. A Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle structure was used. The programme was well-received by carers, who gave examples of application of learning. Modules about conditions frequently resulting in hospital admission, or concerning real cases, demonstrated the best pre-and-post lesson change scores. However, the reach of the programme was low, with attendance rates between 5% and 28%. Overall, the percentage of staff trained in deterioration recognition ranged from 35% (care home one) to 12% (care home three). Hospital admissions reduced from 37 hospital admissions to 20 over the duration of the project. Potentially avoidable admissions reduced from 16 to 5. Proving causality to the intervention was difficult. Factors facilitating delivery of training included a flexible approach, an activity-based curriculum, alignment of topics with real cases and embedding key messages in every tutorial. Barriers included: time pressures, shift work, low attendance rates, inequitable perception of the value of teaching and IT issues. Care home factors impacting on delivery included: stability of management and internal communication systems. please ensure space here BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7908301/ /pubmed/33627343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Armstrong, Sarah Frances
Gluck, Tim
Gorringe, Anna
Stork, Annie
Jowett, Sally
Nadicksbernd, J J
Salt, Matthew
Bradley, Kelly
Care homes education: what can we learn?
title Care homes education: what can we learn?
title_full Care homes education: what can we learn?
title_fullStr Care homes education: what can we learn?
title_full_unstemmed Care homes education: what can we learn?
title_short Care homes education: what can we learn?
title_sort care homes education: what can we learn?
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001153
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongsarahfrances carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT glucktim carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT gorringeanna carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT storkannie carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT jowettsally carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT nadicksberndjj carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT saltmatthew carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn
AT bradleykelly carehomeseducationwhatcanwelearn