Cargando…
Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343 |
_version_ | 1783655685866651648 |
---|---|
author | Molina-Rueda, Francisco Fernández-González, Pilar Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia Koutsou, Aikaterini Carratalá-Tejada, María Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos |
author_facet | Molina-Rueda, Francisco Fernández-González, Pilar Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia Koutsou, Aikaterini Carratalá-Tejada, María Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos |
author_sort | Molina-Rueda, Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients’ clinical assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7908319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79083192021-02-27 Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects Molina-Rueda, Francisco Fernández-González, Pilar Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia Koutsou, Aikaterini Carratalá-Tejada, María Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients’ clinical assessments. MDPI 2021-02-02 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7908319/ /pubmed/33540795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Molina-Rueda, Francisco Fernández-González, Pilar Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia Koutsou, Aikaterini Carratalá-Tejada, María Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title | Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title_full | Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title_fullStr | Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title_short | Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects |
title_sort | test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model for registering joint angles during initial contact and toe-off in healthy subjects |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinaruedafrancisco testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects AT fernandezgonzalezpilar testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects AT cuestagomezalicia testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects AT koutsouaikaterini testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects AT carratalatejadamaria testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects AT miangolarrapagejuancarlos testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects |