Cargando…

Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects

The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina-Rueda, Francisco, Fernández-González, Pilar, Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia, Koutsou, Aikaterini, Carratalá-Tejada, María, Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343
_version_ 1783655685866651648
author Molina-Rueda, Francisco
Fernández-González, Pilar
Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia
Koutsou, Aikaterini
Carratalá-Tejada, María
Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos
author_facet Molina-Rueda, Francisco
Fernández-González, Pilar
Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia
Koutsou, Aikaterini
Carratalá-Tejada, María
Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos
author_sort Molina-Rueda, Francisco
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients’ clinical assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79083192021-02-27 Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects Molina-Rueda, Francisco Fernández-González, Pilar Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia Koutsou, Aikaterini Carratalá-Tejada, María Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System(®) (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients’ clinical assessments. MDPI 2021-02-02 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7908319/ /pubmed/33540795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Molina-Rueda, Francisco
Fernández-González, Pilar
Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia
Koutsou, Aikaterini
Carratalá-Tejada, María
Miangolarra-Page, Juan Carlos
Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title_full Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title_fullStr Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title_short Test–Retest Reliability of a Conventional Gait Model for Registering Joint Angles during Initial Contact and Toe-Off in Healthy Subjects
title_sort test–retest reliability of a conventional gait model for registering joint angles during initial contact and toe-off in healthy subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540795
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031343
work_keys_str_mv AT molinaruedafrancisco testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects
AT fernandezgonzalezpilar testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects
AT cuestagomezalicia testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects
AT koutsouaikaterini testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects
AT carratalatejadamaria testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects
AT miangolarrapagejuancarlos testretestreliabilityofaconventionalgaitmodelforregisteringjointanglesduringinitialcontactandtoeoffinhealthysubjects