Cargando…

Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the second most common subtype of RCC, after clear cell RCC. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of FDG PET/CT in primary and recurrent papillary RCC, and the role of staging FDG PET/CT in predicting survival. METHODS: A total of 66 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Guozhu, Zhao, Dachun, Jiang, Yuanyuan, Zhu, Zhaohui, Huo, Li, Li, Fang, Cheng, Wuying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8
_version_ 1783655786061234176
author Hou, Guozhu
Zhao, Dachun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Zhu, Zhaohui
Huo, Li
Li, Fang
Cheng, Wuying
author_facet Hou, Guozhu
Zhao, Dachun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Zhu, Zhaohui
Huo, Li
Li, Fang
Cheng, Wuying
author_sort Hou, Guozhu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the second most common subtype of RCC, after clear cell RCC. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of FDG PET/CT in primary and recurrent papillary RCC, and the role of staging FDG PET/CT in predicting survival. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with histopathologically confirmed papillary RCC who underwent either staging or restaging FDG PET/CT scans (30 had staging scans only, 28 had restaging scans only, 8 had both) were retrospectively included in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of restaging FDG PET/CT for detecting recurrence were assessed by histopathology and/or clinical follow-up as standard reference. RESULTS: Staging FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 38 patients, of which 31 (81.5%) showed FDG-positive primary renal lesions. The SUVmax of high-grade (WHO grade 3 and 4) papillary RCCs were significantly higher than that of low-grade (WHO grade 1 and 2) tumors (9.44 ± 6.18 vs 4.83 ± 3.19, P = 0.008). The SUVmax was not significantly different between type 1 and type 2 papillary RCCs (5.71 ± 2.88 vs. 6.99 ± 5.57, P = 0.563). Of the 38 patients, 12 developed disease progression during the follow-up period. Patients with primary tumor SUVmax> 5.85 were associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with tumor SUVmax≤5.85 (P = 0.005). Restaging FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 36 patients with suspected recurrent papillary RCCs. FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 72.7% for detecting recurrent disease. Comparison of PET/CT scans with CT/MRI imaging was available in 23 patients. FDG PET/CT revealed additional findings in 11 patients, mainly including lymph node and bone metastases. FDG PET/CT findings led to change in management in 5.3% (2/38) of patients in the staging setting and 16.7 (6/36) of patients in the restaging setting. CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 81.5% for detecting primary papillary RCC, and tumor SUVmax derived from staging FDG PET/CT was a predictor of PFS. In the restaging process of papillary RCC, FDG PET/CT was very effective for detecting recurrent disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79087602021-02-26 Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma Hou, Guozhu Zhao, Dachun Jiang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Zhaohui Huo, Li Li, Fang Cheng, Wuying Cancer Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the second most common subtype of RCC, after clear cell RCC. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of FDG PET/CT in primary and recurrent papillary RCC, and the role of staging FDG PET/CT in predicting survival. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with histopathologically confirmed papillary RCC who underwent either staging or restaging FDG PET/CT scans (30 had staging scans only, 28 had restaging scans only, 8 had both) were retrospectively included in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of restaging FDG PET/CT for detecting recurrence were assessed by histopathology and/or clinical follow-up as standard reference. RESULTS: Staging FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 38 patients, of which 31 (81.5%) showed FDG-positive primary renal lesions. The SUVmax of high-grade (WHO grade 3 and 4) papillary RCCs were significantly higher than that of low-grade (WHO grade 1 and 2) tumors (9.44 ± 6.18 vs 4.83 ± 3.19, P = 0.008). The SUVmax was not significantly different between type 1 and type 2 papillary RCCs (5.71 ± 2.88 vs. 6.99 ± 5.57, P = 0.563). Of the 38 patients, 12 developed disease progression during the follow-up period. Patients with primary tumor SUVmax> 5.85 were associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with tumor SUVmax≤5.85 (P = 0.005). Restaging FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 36 patients with suspected recurrent papillary RCCs. FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 72.7% for detecting recurrent disease. Comparison of PET/CT scans with CT/MRI imaging was available in 23 patients. FDG PET/CT revealed additional findings in 11 patients, mainly including lymph node and bone metastases. FDG PET/CT findings led to change in management in 5.3% (2/38) of patients in the staging setting and 16.7 (6/36) of patients in the restaging setting. CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 81.5% for detecting primary papillary RCC, and tumor SUVmax derived from staging FDG PET/CT was a predictor of PFS. In the restaging process of papillary RCC, FDG PET/CT was very effective for detecting recurrent disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8. BioMed Central 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7908760/ /pubmed/33632314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hou, Guozhu
Zhao, Dachun
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Zhu, Zhaohui
Huo, Li
Li, Fang
Cheng, Wuying
Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_full Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_short Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_sort clinical utility of fdg pet/ct for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8
work_keys_str_mv AT houguozhu clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhaodachun clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT jiangyuanyuan clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhuzhaohui clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT huoli clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT lifang clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma
AT chengwuying clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforprimaryandrecurrentpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma