Cargando…

Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle problems are common in rheumatic disorders and often lead to pain and limitations in functioning, affecting quality of life. There appears to be large variability in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders across podiatrists. To increase uniformity and quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huijbrechts, E. J., Dekker, J., Tenten-Diepenmaat, M., Gerritsen, M., van der Leeden, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00435-7
_version_ 1783655790221983744
author Huijbrechts, E. J.
Dekker, J.
Tenten-Diepenmaat, M.
Gerritsen, M.
van der Leeden, M.
author_facet Huijbrechts, E. J.
Dekker, J.
Tenten-Diepenmaat, M.
Gerritsen, M.
van der Leeden, M.
author_sort Huijbrechts, E. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle problems are common in rheumatic disorders and often lead to pain and limitations in functioning, affecting quality of life. There appears to be large variability in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders across podiatrists. To increase uniformity and quality of podiatry care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and gout a clinical protocol has been developed. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: [1] to evaluate an educational programme to train podiatrists in the use of the protocol and [2] to explore barriers and facilitators for the use of the protocol in daily practice. METHOD: This study used a mixed method design and included 32 podiatrists in the Netherlands. An educational programme was developed and provided to train the podiatrists in the use of the protocol. They thereafter received a digital questionnaire to evaluate the educational programme. Subsequently, podiatrists used the protocol for three months in their practice. Facilitators and barriers that they experienced in the use of the protocol were determined by a questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were held to get more in-depth understanding. RESULTS: The mean satisfaction with the educational programme was 7.6 (SD 1.11), on a 11 point scale. Practical knowledge on joint palpation, programme variation and the use of practice cases were valued most. The protocol appeared to provide support in the diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of foot problems in rheumatic disorders and the treatment recommendations were clear and understandable. The main barrier for use of the protocol was time. The protocol has not yet been implemented in the electronic patient file, which makes it more time consuming. Other experienced barriers were the reimbursement for the treatment and financial compensation. CONCLUSIONS: The educational programme concerning the clinical protocol for foot problems in rheumatic disorders appears to be helpful for podiatrists. Podiatrists perceived the protocol as being supportive during patient management. Barriers for use of the protocol were identified and should be addressed prior to large scale implementation. Whether the protocol is also beneficial for patients, needs to be determined in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79087822021-02-26 Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design Huijbrechts, E. J. Dekker, J. Tenten-Diepenmaat, M. Gerritsen, M. van der Leeden, M. J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle problems are common in rheumatic disorders and often lead to pain and limitations in functioning, affecting quality of life. There appears to be large variability in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders across podiatrists. To increase uniformity and quality of podiatry care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and gout a clinical protocol has been developed. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: [1] to evaluate an educational programme to train podiatrists in the use of the protocol and [2] to explore barriers and facilitators for the use of the protocol in daily practice. METHOD: This study used a mixed method design and included 32 podiatrists in the Netherlands. An educational programme was developed and provided to train the podiatrists in the use of the protocol. They thereafter received a digital questionnaire to evaluate the educational programme. Subsequently, podiatrists used the protocol for three months in their practice. Facilitators and barriers that they experienced in the use of the protocol were determined by a questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were held to get more in-depth understanding. RESULTS: The mean satisfaction with the educational programme was 7.6 (SD 1.11), on a 11 point scale. Practical knowledge on joint palpation, programme variation and the use of practice cases were valued most. The protocol appeared to provide support in the diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of foot problems in rheumatic disorders and the treatment recommendations were clear and understandable. The main barrier for use of the protocol was time. The protocol has not yet been implemented in the electronic patient file, which makes it more time consuming. Other experienced barriers were the reimbursement for the treatment and financial compensation. CONCLUSIONS: The educational programme concerning the clinical protocol for foot problems in rheumatic disorders appears to be helpful for podiatrists. Podiatrists perceived the protocol as being supportive during patient management. Barriers for use of the protocol were identified and should be addressed prior to large scale implementation. Whether the protocol is also beneficial for patients, needs to be determined in future research. BioMed Central 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7908782/ /pubmed/33632287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00435-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huijbrechts, E. J.
Dekker, J.
Tenten-Diepenmaat, M.
Gerritsen, M.
van der Leeden, M.
Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title_full Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title_fullStr Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title_full_unstemmed Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title_short Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
title_sort clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00435-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huijbrechtsej clinicalguidanceforpodiatristsinthemanagementoffootproblemsinrheumaticdisordersevaluationofaneducationalprogrammeforpodiatristsusingamixedmethodsdesign
AT dekkerj clinicalguidanceforpodiatristsinthemanagementoffootproblemsinrheumaticdisordersevaluationofaneducationalprogrammeforpodiatristsusingamixedmethodsdesign
AT tentendiepenmaatm clinicalguidanceforpodiatristsinthemanagementoffootproblemsinrheumaticdisordersevaluationofaneducationalprogrammeforpodiatristsusingamixedmethodsdesign
AT gerritsenm clinicalguidanceforpodiatristsinthemanagementoffootproblemsinrheumaticdisordersevaluationofaneducationalprogrammeforpodiatristsusingamixedmethodsdesign
AT vanderleedenm clinicalguidanceforpodiatristsinthemanagementoffootproblemsinrheumaticdisordersevaluationofaneducationalprogrammeforpodiatristsusingamixedmethodsdesign