Cargando…

Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for referral to cancer genetics service for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer have changed over time. This study was conducted to assess the changing referral patterns and outcomes for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer across three regional ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallenstein, Lucie G., Sorensen, Carol, Hodgson, Lorraine, Wen, Shelly, Westhuyzen, Justin, Hansen, Carmen, Last, Andrew T. J., Amalaseelan, Julan V., Salindera, Shehnarz, Ross, William, Spigelman, Allan D., Shakespeare, Thomas P., Aherne, Noel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00176-z
_version_ 1783655791677407232
author Hallenstein, Lucie G.
Sorensen, Carol
Hodgson, Lorraine
Wen, Shelly
Westhuyzen, Justin
Hansen, Carmen
Last, Andrew T. J.
Amalaseelan, Julan V.
Salindera, Shehnarz
Ross, William
Spigelman, Allan D.
Shakespeare, Thomas P.
Aherne, Noel J.
author_facet Hallenstein, Lucie G.
Sorensen, Carol
Hodgson, Lorraine
Wen, Shelly
Westhuyzen, Justin
Hansen, Carmen
Last, Andrew T. J.
Amalaseelan, Julan V.
Salindera, Shehnarz
Ross, William
Spigelman, Allan D.
Shakespeare, Thomas P.
Aherne, Noel J.
author_sort Hallenstein, Lucie G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines for referral to cancer genetics service for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer have changed over time. This study was conducted to assess the changing referral patterns and outcomes for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer across three regional cancer centres during the years 2014–2018. METHODS: Following ethical approval, a retrospective electronic medical record review was performed to identify those women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, and whether they were referred to a genetics service and if so, the outcome of that genetics assessment and/or genetic testing. RESULTS: There were 2441 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen at our cancer services during the years 2014–2018, of whom 237 women were diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. Based on age of diagnosis criteria alone, 13% (31/237) of our cohort fulfilled criteria for genetic testing, with 81% (25/31) being referred to a cancer genetics service. Of this group 68% (21/31) were referred to genetics services within our regions and went on to have genetic testing with 10 pathogenic variants identified; 5x BRCA1, 4x BRCA2 and × 1 ATM:c.7271 T > G. CONCLUSIONS: Referral pathways for women diagnosed with TNBC to cancer genetics services are performing well across our cancer centres. We identified a group of women who did not meet eligibility criteria for referral at their time of diagnosis, but would now be eligible, as guidelines have changed. The use of cross-discipline retrospective data reviews is a useful tool to identify patients who could benefit from being re-contacted over time for an updated cancer genetics assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79087922021-02-26 Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia Hallenstein, Lucie G. Sorensen, Carol Hodgson, Lorraine Wen, Shelly Westhuyzen, Justin Hansen, Carmen Last, Andrew T. J. Amalaseelan, Julan V. Salindera, Shehnarz Ross, William Spigelman, Allan D. Shakespeare, Thomas P. Aherne, Noel J. Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines for referral to cancer genetics service for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer have changed over time. This study was conducted to assess the changing referral patterns and outcomes for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer across three regional cancer centres during the years 2014–2018. METHODS: Following ethical approval, a retrospective electronic medical record review was performed to identify those women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, and whether they were referred to a genetics service and if so, the outcome of that genetics assessment and/or genetic testing. RESULTS: There were 2441 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen at our cancer services during the years 2014–2018, of whom 237 women were diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. Based on age of diagnosis criteria alone, 13% (31/237) of our cohort fulfilled criteria for genetic testing, with 81% (25/31) being referred to a cancer genetics service. Of this group 68% (21/31) were referred to genetics services within our regions and went on to have genetic testing with 10 pathogenic variants identified; 5x BRCA1, 4x BRCA2 and × 1 ATM:c.7271 T > G. CONCLUSIONS: Referral pathways for women diagnosed with TNBC to cancer genetics services are performing well across our cancer centres. We identified a group of women who did not meet eligibility criteria for referral at their time of diagnosis, but would now be eligible, as guidelines have changed. The use of cross-discipline retrospective data reviews is a useful tool to identify patients who could benefit from being re-contacted over time for an updated cancer genetics assessment. BioMed Central 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7908792/ /pubmed/33637119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00176-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hallenstein, Lucie G.
Sorensen, Carol
Hodgson, Lorraine
Wen, Shelly
Westhuyzen, Justin
Hansen, Carmen
Last, Andrew T. J.
Amalaseelan, Julan V.
Salindera, Shehnarz
Ross, William
Spigelman, Allan D.
Shakespeare, Thomas P.
Aherne, Noel J.
Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title_full Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title_fullStr Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title_short Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia
title_sort assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in australia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00176-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hallensteinlucieg assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT sorensencarol assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT hodgsonlorraine assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT wenshelly assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT westhuyzenjustin assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT hansencarmen assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT lastandrewtj assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT amalaseelanjulanv assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT salinderashehnarz assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT rosswilliam assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT spigelmanalland assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT shakespearethomasp assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia
AT ahernenoelj assessmentofgeneticreferralsandoutcomesforwomenwithtriplenegativebreastcancerinregionalcancercentresinaustralia