Cargando…

Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarkson, Jan, Ramsay, Craig, Lamont, Thomas, Goulao, Beatriz, Worthington, Helen, Heasman, Peter, Norrie, John, Boyers, Dwayne, Duncan, Anne, van der Pol, Marjon, Young, Linda, Macpherson, Lorna, McCracken, Giles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3
_version_ 1783655825576820736
author Clarkson, Jan
Ramsay, Craig
Lamont, Thomas
Goulao, Beatriz
Worthington, Helen
Heasman, Peter
Norrie, John
Boyers, Dwayne
Duncan, Anne
van der Pol, Marjon
Young, Linda
Macpherson, Lorna
McCracken, Giles
author_facet Clarkson, Jan
Ramsay, Craig
Lamont, Thomas
Goulao, Beatriz
Worthington, Helen
Heasman, Peter
Norrie, John
Boyers, Dwayne
Duncan, Anne
van der Pol, Marjon
Young, Linda
Macpherson, Lorna
McCracken, Giles
author_sort Clarkson, Jan
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluation. UK dental practices were cluster randomised to deliver OHA as usual or personalised. In a separate randomisation, patients were allocated to receive S&P 6-monthly, 12-monthly or never. Setting UK primary dental care. Participants Practices providing NHS care and adults who had received regular dental check-ups. Main outcome measures The percent of sites with bleeding on probing, patient confidence in self-care, incremental net benefits (INB) over three years. Results Sixty-three practices and 1,877 adult patients were randomised and 1,327 analysed (clinical outcome). There was no statistically significant or clinically important difference in gingival bleeding between the three S&P groups (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference 0.87% sites, 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.3, p = 0.48) or between personalised or usual OHA groups (difference -2.5% sites, -95%CI: -8.3 to 3.3, p = 0.39), or oral hygiene self-efficacy (cognitive impact) between either group (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference -0.028, 95% CI -0.119 to 0.063, p = 0.543). The general population place a high value on, and are willing to pay for, S&P services. However, from a dental health perspective, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Conclusion Results suggest S&P treatments and delivering brief personalised OHA provide no clinical benefit and are therefore an inefficient approach to improving dental health (38% of sites were bleeding whatever intervention was received). However, the general population value both interventions. Zusatzmaterial online: Zu diesem Beitrag sind unter 10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 für autorisierte Leser zusätzliche Dateien abrufbar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7908958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79089582021-02-26 Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial Clarkson, Jan Ramsay, Craig Lamont, Thomas Goulao, Beatriz Worthington, Helen Heasman, Peter Norrie, John Boyers, Dwayne Duncan, Anne van der Pol, Marjon Young, Linda Macpherson, Lorna McCracken, Giles Br Dent J Research Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluation. UK dental practices were cluster randomised to deliver OHA as usual or personalised. In a separate randomisation, patients were allocated to receive S&P 6-monthly, 12-monthly or never. Setting UK primary dental care. Participants Practices providing NHS care and adults who had received regular dental check-ups. Main outcome measures The percent of sites with bleeding on probing, patient confidence in self-care, incremental net benefits (INB) over three years. Results Sixty-three practices and 1,877 adult patients were randomised and 1,327 analysed (clinical outcome). There was no statistically significant or clinically important difference in gingival bleeding between the three S&P groups (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference 0.87% sites, 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.3, p = 0.48) or between personalised or usual OHA groups (difference -2.5% sites, -95%CI: -8.3 to 3.3, p = 0.39), or oral hygiene self-efficacy (cognitive impact) between either group (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference -0.028, 95% CI -0.119 to 0.063, p = 0.543). The general population place a high value on, and are willing to pay for, S&P services. However, from a dental health perspective, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Conclusion Results suggest S&P treatments and delivering brief personalised OHA provide no clinical benefit and are therefore an inefficient approach to improving dental health (38% of sites were bleeding whatever intervention was received). However, the general population value both interventions. Zusatzmaterial online: Zu diesem Beitrag sind unter 10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 für autorisierte Leser zusätzliche Dateien abrufbar. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7908958/ /pubmed/33637926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Clarkson, Jan
Ramsay, Craig
Lamont, Thomas
Goulao, Beatriz
Worthington, Helen
Heasman, Peter
Norrie, John
Boyers, Dwayne
Duncan, Anne
van der Pol, Marjon
Young, Linda
Macpherson, Lorna
McCracken, Giles
Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title_full Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title_short Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
title_sort examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the iquad cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3
work_keys_str_mv AT clarksonjan examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ramsaycraig examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lamontthomas examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goulaobeatriz examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT worthingtonhelen examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heasmanpeter examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT norriejohn examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boyersdwayne examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duncananne examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderpolmarjon examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT younglinda examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macphersonlorna examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccrackengiles examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial