Cargando…
Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 |
_version_ | 1783655825576820736 |
---|---|
author | Clarkson, Jan Ramsay, Craig Lamont, Thomas Goulao, Beatriz Worthington, Helen Heasman, Peter Norrie, John Boyers, Dwayne Duncan, Anne van der Pol, Marjon Young, Linda Macpherson, Lorna McCracken, Giles |
author_facet | Clarkson, Jan Ramsay, Craig Lamont, Thomas Goulao, Beatriz Worthington, Helen Heasman, Peter Norrie, John Boyers, Dwayne Duncan, Anne van der Pol, Marjon Young, Linda Macpherson, Lorna McCracken, Giles |
author_sort | Clarkson, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluation. UK dental practices were cluster randomised to deliver OHA as usual or personalised. In a separate randomisation, patients were allocated to receive S&P 6-monthly, 12-monthly or never. Setting UK primary dental care. Participants Practices providing NHS care and adults who had received regular dental check-ups. Main outcome measures The percent of sites with bleeding on probing, patient confidence in self-care, incremental net benefits (INB) over three years. Results Sixty-three practices and 1,877 adult patients were randomised and 1,327 analysed (clinical outcome). There was no statistically significant or clinically important difference in gingival bleeding between the three S&P groups (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference 0.87% sites, 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.3, p = 0.48) or between personalised or usual OHA groups (difference -2.5% sites, -95%CI: -8.3 to 3.3, p = 0.39), or oral hygiene self-efficacy (cognitive impact) between either group (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference -0.028, 95% CI -0.119 to 0.063, p = 0.543). The general population place a high value on, and are willing to pay for, S&P services. However, from a dental health perspective, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Conclusion Results suggest S&P treatments and delivering brief personalised OHA provide no clinical benefit and are therefore an inefficient approach to improving dental health (38% of sites were bleeding whatever intervention was received). However, the general population value both interventions. Zusatzmaterial online: Zu diesem Beitrag sind unter 10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 für autorisierte Leser zusätzliche Dateien abrufbar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7908958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79089582021-02-26 Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial Clarkson, Jan Ramsay, Craig Lamont, Thomas Goulao, Beatriz Worthington, Helen Heasman, Peter Norrie, John Boyers, Dwayne Duncan, Anne van der Pol, Marjon Young, Linda Macpherson, Lorna McCracken, Giles Br Dent J Research Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost benefit of different frequencies of scale and polish (S&P) treatments in combination with different types of oral hygiene advice (OHA). Design Multi-centre, multi-level cluster randomised factorial open trial with blinded outcome evaluation. UK dental practices were cluster randomised to deliver OHA as usual or personalised. In a separate randomisation, patients were allocated to receive S&P 6-monthly, 12-monthly or never. Setting UK primary dental care. Participants Practices providing NHS care and adults who had received regular dental check-ups. Main outcome measures The percent of sites with bleeding on probing, patient confidence in self-care, incremental net benefits (INB) over three years. Results Sixty-three practices and 1,877 adult patients were randomised and 1,327 analysed (clinical outcome). There was no statistically significant or clinically important difference in gingival bleeding between the three S&P groups (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference 0.87% sites, 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.3, p = 0.48) or between personalised or usual OHA groups (difference -2.5% sites, -95%CI: -8.3 to 3.3, p = 0.39), or oral hygiene self-efficacy (cognitive impact) between either group (for example, six-monthly versus none: difference -0.028, 95% CI -0.119 to 0.063, p = 0.543). The general population place a high value on, and are willing to pay for, S&P services. However, from a dental health perspective, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Conclusion Results suggest S&P treatments and delivering brief personalised OHA provide no clinical benefit and are therefore an inefficient approach to improving dental health (38% of sites were bleeding whatever intervention was received). However, the general population value both interventions. Zusatzmaterial online: Zu diesem Beitrag sind unter 10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 für autorisierte Leser zusätzliche Dateien abrufbar. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7908958/ /pubmed/33637926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Clarkson, Jan Ramsay, Craig Lamont, Thomas Goulao, Beatriz Worthington, Helen Heasman, Peter Norrie, John Boyers, Dwayne Duncan, Anne van der Pol, Marjon Young, Linda Macpherson, Lorna McCracken, Giles Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title | Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the IQuaD cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | examining the impact of oral hygiene advice and/or scale and polish on periodontal disease: the iquad cluster factorial randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2662-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarksonjan examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ramsaycraig examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lamontthomas examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT goulaobeatriz examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT worthingtonhelen examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heasmanpeter examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT norriejohn examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT boyersdwayne examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT duncananne examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanderpolmarjon examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT younglinda examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macphersonlorna examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccrackengiles examiningtheimpactoforalhygieneadviceandorscaleandpolishonperiodontaldiseasetheiquadclusterfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial |