Cargando…

Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study

In diverticular bleeding, extravasation detected by computed tomography indicates active bleeding. It is unclear whether an endoscopic procedure is the best method of hemostasis for diverticular bleeding. This retrospective study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamagishi, Toshinobu, Kashiura, Masahiro, Shindo, Yuji, Yamanaka, Kenichi, Tsuboi, Ken, Shinhata, Hakuei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024736
_version_ 1783655855689826304
author Yamagishi, Toshinobu
Kashiura, Masahiro
Shindo, Yuji
Yamanaka, Kenichi
Tsuboi, Ken
Shinhata, Hakuei
author_facet Yamagishi, Toshinobu
Kashiura, Masahiro
Shindo, Yuji
Yamanaka, Kenichi
Tsuboi, Ken
Shinhata, Hakuei
author_sort Yamagishi, Toshinobu
collection PubMed
description In diverticular bleeding, extravasation detected by computed tomography indicates active bleeding. It is unclear whether an endoscopic procedure is the best method of hemostasis for diverticular bleeding. This retrospective study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular rebleeding with extravasation visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This single-center, retrospective, the observational study utilized data from an endoscopic database. Adult patients admitted to our hospital due to diverticular bleeding diagnosed by colonoscopy were included. We compared the data between the extravasation-positive and extravasation-negative groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of successful hemostasis without rebleeding within 1 month after the first endoscopic procedure. Altogether, 69 patients were included in the study (n = 17, extravasation-positive group; n = 52, extravasation-negative group). The overall rebleeding rate was 30.4% (21/69). The rebleeding rate was higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group, although without a statistically significant difference. However, among the patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis, the rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group (50% [8/16] vs 10.5% [2/19], p = .022). In the extravasation-positive group, all 8 patients with rebleeding underwent repeat colonoscopy. Of these, 5 patients required additional clips; bleeding was controlled in 3 patients, while arterial embolization or surgery was required for hemostasis in 2 patients. None of the remaining 3 patients with rebleeding in the extravasation-positive group required clipping; thus, their conditions were only observed. Many patients with diverticular bleeding who exhibited extravasation on computed tomography experienced rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. However, bleeding in more than half of these patients could be stopped by 2 endoscopic procedures, without performing transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery even if rebleeding occurred. Some serious major complications due to such invasive interventions are reported in the literature, but colonoscopic complications did not occur in our patients. Endoscopic hemostasis may be the preferred and effective first-line therapy for patients with diverticular bleeding who have extravasation, as visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7909096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79090962021-03-01 Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study Yamagishi, Toshinobu Kashiura, Masahiro Shindo, Yuji Yamanaka, Kenichi Tsuboi, Ken Shinhata, Hakuei Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 In diverticular bleeding, extravasation detected by computed tomography indicates active bleeding. It is unclear whether an endoscopic procedure is the best method of hemostasis for diverticular bleeding. This retrospective study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular rebleeding with extravasation visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This single-center, retrospective, the observational study utilized data from an endoscopic database. Adult patients admitted to our hospital due to diverticular bleeding diagnosed by colonoscopy were included. We compared the data between the extravasation-positive and extravasation-negative groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of successful hemostasis without rebleeding within 1 month after the first endoscopic procedure. Altogether, 69 patients were included in the study (n = 17, extravasation-positive group; n = 52, extravasation-negative group). The overall rebleeding rate was 30.4% (21/69). The rebleeding rate was higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group, although without a statistically significant difference. However, among the patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis, the rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group (50% [8/16] vs 10.5% [2/19], p = .022). In the extravasation-positive group, all 8 patients with rebleeding underwent repeat colonoscopy. Of these, 5 patients required additional clips; bleeding was controlled in 3 patients, while arterial embolization or surgery was required for hemostasis in 2 patients. None of the remaining 3 patients with rebleeding in the extravasation-positive group required clipping; thus, their conditions were only observed. Many patients with diverticular bleeding who exhibited extravasation on computed tomography experienced rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. However, bleeding in more than half of these patients could be stopped by 2 endoscopic procedures, without performing transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery even if rebleeding occurred. Some serious major complications due to such invasive interventions are reported in the literature, but colonoscopic complications did not occur in our patients. Endoscopic hemostasis may be the preferred and effective first-line therapy for patients with diverticular bleeding who have extravasation, as visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7909096/ /pubmed/33663086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024736 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Yamagishi, Toshinobu
Kashiura, Masahiro
Shindo, Yuji
Yamanaka, Kenichi
Tsuboi, Ken
Shinhata, Hakuei
Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_short Effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_sort effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular bleeding with extravasation detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a single-center retrospective cohort study
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024736
work_keys_str_mv AT yamagishitoshinobu effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kashiuramasahiro effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shindoyuji effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yamanakakenichi effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tsuboiken effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shinhatahakuei effectivenessofendoscopichemostasisinpreventingdiverticularbleedingwithextravasationdetectedbycontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy