Cargando…

Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common type of acute brain dysfunction among emergency department (ED) patients. The prevalence of delirium in the ED is up to 40%. Although screening instruments used to identify delirium have been developed, it is unclear which tool is the most accurate in the ED. To addr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qian, Li, Sheng, Chen, Meixi, Yang, Qiuyu, Cao, Xiao, Ge, Long, Di, Baoshan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024779
_version_ 1783655871284248576
author Zhang, Qian
Li, Sheng
Chen, Meixi
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
Di, Baoshan
author_facet Zhang, Qian
Li, Sheng
Chen, Meixi
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
Di, Baoshan
author_sort Zhang, Qian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common type of acute brain dysfunction among emergency department (ED) patients. The prevalence of delirium in the ED is up to 40%. Although screening instruments used to identify delirium have been developed, it is unclear which tool is the most accurate in the ED. To address this challenging, we systematically examine the accuracy of delirium screening tools used to assess the ED patients. METHODS: This study has been registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY), and the registration number is INPLASY202110041. We will search the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Studies involving patients which compared diagnostic instruments with the criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as a reference standard will be included. We will use STATA 15.1 and MetaDiSC to make careful analysis of the results. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 scale. RESULTS: In this study, the accuracy of different screening methods among ED patients is assessed by a high-quality synthesis. The number of tools available for screening delirium in the ED, the information of studies including the countries, the study design, the sample size and the characteristic of studies, the quality of the studies and the results of meta-analysis. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: According to the conclusion of the systematic review, evidence will be provided to judge which screening method is the best for the ED patients. The results will bring better understanding of screening methods in the ED and highlight gaps for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7909163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79091632021-03-01 Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Qian Li, Sheng Chen, Meixi Yang, Qiuyu Cao, Xiao Ge, Long Di, Baoshan Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common type of acute brain dysfunction among emergency department (ED) patients. The prevalence of delirium in the ED is up to 40%. Although screening instruments used to identify delirium have been developed, it is unclear which tool is the most accurate in the ED. To address this challenging, we systematically examine the accuracy of delirium screening tools used to assess the ED patients. METHODS: This study has been registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY), and the registration number is INPLASY202110041. We will search the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Studies involving patients which compared diagnostic instruments with the criteria in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as a reference standard will be included. We will use STATA 15.1 and MetaDiSC to make careful analysis of the results. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 scale. RESULTS: In this study, the accuracy of different screening methods among ED patients is assessed by a high-quality synthesis. The number of tools available for screening delirium in the ED, the information of studies including the countries, the study design, the sample size and the characteristic of studies, the quality of the studies and the results of meta-analysis. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: According to the conclusion of the systematic review, evidence will be provided to judge which screening method is the best for the ED patients. The results will bring better understanding of screening methods in the ED and highlight gaps for future research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7909163/ /pubmed/33663094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024779 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Zhang, Qian
Li, Sheng
Chen, Meixi
Yang, Qiuyu
Cao, Xiao
Ge, Long
Di, Baoshan
Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Delirium screening tools in the emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort delirium screening tools in the emergency department: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024779
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqian deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisheng deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenmeixi deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangqiuyu deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caoxiao deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gelong deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dibaoshan deliriumscreeningtoolsintheemergencydepartmentaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis