Cargando…

Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain

The Encoding-Specificity Paradigm indicates that memory recall will be superior when contextual factors are congruent between memory encoding and memory retrieval. However, unlike other contextual conditions (e.g., verbal context, mental operations, global feature context, mood dependency, and physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanes, Danielle, Frith, Emily, Loprinzi, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PsychOpen 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1767
_version_ 1783655876028006400
author Yanes, Danielle
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
author_facet Yanes, Danielle
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
author_sort Yanes, Danielle
collection PubMed
description The Encoding-Specificity Paradigm indicates that memory recall will be superior when contextual factors are congruent between memory encoding and memory retrieval. However, unlike other contextual conditions (e.g., verbal context, mental operations, global feature context, mood dependency, and physical operations), this paradigm has nearly been ignored in the exercise domain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the Encoding-Specificity Paradigm in the context of exercise and rest conditions. 24 young adults (age: M = 21 years) completed a within-subject, counterbalanced experiment involving four laboratory visits, including 1) R-R (rest-rest) condition, 2) R-E (rest-exercise) condition, 3) E-R (exercise-rest) condition, or 4) E-E (exercise-exercise) condition. The exercise bout included a 15-minute moderate-intensity walk on a treadmill. Memory recall was assessed via a 15 word-list task. Memory recall was greater for R-R (8.71 ± 3.1) versus R-E (7.46 ± 2.8), and similarly, for E-E (8.63 ± 2.7) versus E-R (8.21 ± 2.7). The mean word recall for the congruent and incongruent conditions, respectively, was 8.67 (2.4) and 7.83 (2.4). There was a statistically significant condition effect (F = 5.02; P = .03; partial η² = .18). This experiment provides direct support for the Encoding-Specificity Paradigm in the exercise domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7909183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PsychOpen
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79091832021-03-04 Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain Yanes, Danielle Frith, Emily Loprinzi, Paul D. Eur J Psychol Research Reports The Encoding-Specificity Paradigm indicates that memory recall will be superior when contextual factors are congruent between memory encoding and memory retrieval. However, unlike other contextual conditions (e.g., verbal context, mental operations, global feature context, mood dependency, and physical operations), this paradigm has nearly been ignored in the exercise domain. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the Encoding-Specificity Paradigm in the context of exercise and rest conditions. 24 young adults (age: M = 21 years) completed a within-subject, counterbalanced experiment involving four laboratory visits, including 1) R-R (rest-rest) condition, 2) R-E (rest-exercise) condition, 3) E-R (exercise-rest) condition, or 4) E-E (exercise-exercise) condition. The exercise bout included a 15-minute moderate-intensity walk on a treadmill. Memory recall was assessed via a 15 word-list task. Memory recall was greater for R-R (8.71 ± 3.1) versus R-E (7.46 ± 2.8), and similarly, for E-E (8.63 ± 2.7) versus E-R (8.21 ± 2.7). The mean word recall for the congruent and incongruent conditions, respectively, was 8.67 (2.4) and 7.83 (2.4). There was a statistically significant condition effect (F = 5.02; P = .03; partial η² = .18). This experiment provides direct support for the Encoding-Specificity Paradigm in the exercise domain. PsychOpen 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7909183/ /pubmed/33680140 http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1767 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Yanes, Danielle
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title_full Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title_fullStr Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title_full_unstemmed Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title_short Memory-Related Encoding-Specificity Paradigm: Experimental Application to the Exercise Domain
title_sort memory-related encoding-specificity paradigm: experimental application to the exercise domain
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1767
work_keys_str_mv AT yanesdanielle memoryrelatedencodingspecificityparadigmexperimentalapplicationtotheexercisedomain
AT frithemily memoryrelatedencodingspecificityparadigmexperimentalapplicationtotheexercisedomain
AT loprinzipauld memoryrelatedencodingspecificityparadigmexperimentalapplicationtotheexercisedomain