Cargando…

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast

BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deori, Ananya, Gupta, Nikhil, Gupta, Arun Kumar, Yelamanchi, Raghav, Agrawal, Himanshu, Durga, C K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679225
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12
_version_ 1783655912927395840
author Deori, Ananya
Gupta, Nikhil
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Yelamanchi, Raghav
Agrawal, Himanshu
Durga, C K
author_facet Deori, Ananya
Gupta, Nikhil
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Yelamanchi, Raghav
Agrawal, Himanshu
Durga, C K
author_sort Deori, Ananya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled single blinded study was conducted with a sample size of 70 patients who were randomised into two groups. One group underwent MRM using ultrasonic dissector (Group A) and the other one using electrocautery (Group B). Intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Group A had an average operating time of 30.86 min, which was statistically less than that of Group B. The mean mop count and the daily drain output in Group A were less as compared to Group B and the differences were statistically significant. Drain was removed early in Group A as compared to Group B. However, post-operative pain scores and seroma formation were not statistically significant among the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector group had significantly lesser intra-operative bleeding, operating time and post-operative drain output when compared to electrocautery group. However, the two groups had no significant difference in post-operative pain scores and seroma formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7909355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79093552021-03-04 A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast Deori, Ananya Gupta, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Yelamanchi, Raghav Agrawal, Himanshu Durga, C K Malays J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled single blinded study was conducted with a sample size of 70 patients who were randomised into two groups. One group underwent MRM using ultrasonic dissector (Group A) and the other one using electrocautery (Group B). Intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Group A had an average operating time of 30.86 min, which was statistically less than that of Group B. The mean mop count and the daily drain output in Group A were less as compared to Group B and the differences were statistically significant. Drain was removed early in Group A as compared to Group B. However, post-operative pain scores and seroma formation were not statistically significant among the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector group had significantly lesser intra-operative bleeding, operating time and post-operative drain output when compared to electrocautery group. However, the two groups had no significant difference in post-operative pain scores and seroma formation. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2021-02 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7909355/ /pubmed/33679225 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2021 This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Deori, Ananya
Gupta, Nikhil
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Yelamanchi, Raghav
Agrawal, Himanshu
Durga, C K
A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title_full A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title_short A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
title_sort prospective randomised controlled study comparing ultrasonic dissector with electrocautery for axillary dissection in patients of carcinoma breast
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679225
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12
work_keys_str_mv AT deoriananya aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT guptanikhil aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT guptaarunkumar aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT yelamanchiraghav aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT agrawalhimanshu aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT durgack aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT deoriananya prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT guptanikhil prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT guptaarunkumar prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT yelamanchiraghav prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT agrawalhimanshu prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast
AT durgack prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast