Cargando…
A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast
BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679225 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12 |
_version_ | 1783655912927395840 |
---|---|
author | Deori, Ananya Gupta, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Yelamanchi, Raghav Agrawal, Himanshu Durga, C K |
author_facet | Deori, Ananya Gupta, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Yelamanchi, Raghav Agrawal, Himanshu Durga, C K |
author_sort | Deori, Ananya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled single blinded study was conducted with a sample size of 70 patients who were randomised into two groups. One group underwent MRM using ultrasonic dissector (Group A) and the other one using electrocautery (Group B). Intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Group A had an average operating time of 30.86 min, which was statistically less than that of Group B. The mean mop count and the daily drain output in Group A were less as compared to Group B and the differences were statistically significant. Drain was removed early in Group A as compared to Group B. However, post-operative pain scores and seroma formation were not statistically significant among the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector group had significantly lesser intra-operative bleeding, operating time and post-operative drain output when compared to electrocautery group. However, the two groups had no significant difference in post-operative pain scores and seroma formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7909355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79093552021-03-04 A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast Deori, Ananya Gupta, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Yelamanchi, Raghav Agrawal, Himanshu Durga, C K Malays J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection is one of the important components of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The present study was conducted to compare surgical outcomes by using monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector for axillary dissection in MRM. METHODS: A parallel randomised controlled single blinded study was conducted with a sample size of 70 patients who were randomised into two groups. One group underwent MRM using ultrasonic dissector (Group A) and the other one using electrocautery (Group B). Intra- and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Group A had an average operating time of 30.86 min, which was statistically less than that of Group B. The mean mop count and the daily drain output in Group A were less as compared to Group B and the differences were statistically significant. Drain was removed early in Group A as compared to Group B. However, post-operative pain scores and seroma formation were not statistically significant among the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector group had significantly lesser intra-operative bleeding, operating time and post-operative drain output when compared to electrocautery group. However, the two groups had no significant difference in post-operative pain scores and seroma formation. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2021-02 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7909355/ /pubmed/33679225 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2021 This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Deori, Ananya Gupta, Nikhil Gupta, Arun Kumar Yelamanchi, Raghav Agrawal, Himanshu Durga, C K A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title | A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title_full | A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title_short | A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissector with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcinoma Breast |
title_sort | prospective randomised controlled study comparing ultrasonic dissector with electrocautery for axillary dissection in patients of carcinoma breast |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679225 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoriananya aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT guptanikhil aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT guptaarunkumar aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT yelamanchiraghav aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT agrawalhimanshu aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT durgack aprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT deoriananya prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT guptanikhil prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT guptaarunkumar prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT yelamanchiraghav prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT agrawalhimanshu prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast AT durgack prospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudycomparingultrasonicdissectorwithelectrocauteryforaxillarydissectioninpatientsofcarcinomabreast |