Cargando…

An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India

BACKGROUND: Better drug regimens for mass drug administration (MDA) could accelerate the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). This community study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of MDA with IDA (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) or DA (diethylcarbam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jambulingam, Purushothaman, Kuttiatt, Vijesh Sreedhar, Krishnamoorthy, Kaliannagounder, Subramanian, Swaminathan, Srividya, Adinarayanan, Raju, Hari Kishan K., Rahi, Manju, Somani, Roopali K., Suryaprakash, Mallanna K., Dwivedi, Gangeshwar P., Weil, Gary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009069
_version_ 1783655982639874048
author Jambulingam, Purushothaman
Kuttiatt, Vijesh Sreedhar
Krishnamoorthy, Kaliannagounder
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Srividya, Adinarayanan
Raju, Hari Kishan K.
Rahi, Manju
Somani, Roopali K.
Suryaprakash, Mallanna K.
Dwivedi, Gangeshwar P.
Weil, Gary J.
author_facet Jambulingam, Purushothaman
Kuttiatt, Vijesh Sreedhar
Krishnamoorthy, Kaliannagounder
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Srividya, Adinarayanan
Raju, Hari Kishan K.
Rahi, Manju
Somani, Roopali K.
Suryaprakash, Mallanna K.
Dwivedi, Gangeshwar P.
Weil, Gary J.
author_sort Jambulingam, Purushothaman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Better drug regimens for mass drug administration (MDA) could accelerate the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). This community study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of MDA with IDA (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) or DA (diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) in India. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This two-armed, open-labelled, block randomised, community study was conducted in LF endemic villages in Yadgir district, Karnataka, India. Consenting participants ≥5 years of age were tested for circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) and microfilaremia (Mf) before treatment with a single oral dose of IDA or DA. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored actively for two days and passively for five more days. Persons with positive CFA or Mf tests at baseline were retested 12-months post-treatment to assess treatment efficacy. Baseline CFA and Mf-rates were 26.4% and 6.9% in IDA and 24.5% and 6.4% in DA villages respectively. 4758 and 4160 participants received IDA and DA. Most AEs were mild after both treatments; fewer than 0.1% of participants experienced AEs with severity > grade 1. No serious AEs were observed. Fever, headache and dizziness were the most common AEs. AE rates were slightly higher after IDA than DA (8.3% vs. 6.4%, P<0.01). AEs were more frequent in females and Mf-positives after either treatment, but significantly more frequent after IDA (40.5% vs 20.2%, P < 0.001). IDA was more effective for clearing Mf than DA (84% vs. 61.8%, P < 0.001). Geometric mean Mf counts per 60μl in retested Mf-positives decreased by 96.4% from 11.8 after IDA and by 90.0% from 9.5 after DA. Neither treatment was effective for clearing CFA. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IDA had an acceptable safety profile and was more effective for clearing Mf than DA. With adequate compliance and medical support to manage AEs, IDA has the potential to accelerate LF elimination in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI No/2016/10/007399)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7909694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79096942021-03-05 An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India Jambulingam, Purushothaman Kuttiatt, Vijesh Sreedhar Krishnamoorthy, Kaliannagounder Subramanian, Swaminathan Srividya, Adinarayanan Raju, Hari Kishan K. Rahi, Manju Somani, Roopali K. Suryaprakash, Mallanna K. Dwivedi, Gangeshwar P. Weil, Gary J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Better drug regimens for mass drug administration (MDA) could accelerate the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). This community study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of MDA with IDA (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) or DA (diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) in India. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This two-armed, open-labelled, block randomised, community study was conducted in LF endemic villages in Yadgir district, Karnataka, India. Consenting participants ≥5 years of age were tested for circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) and microfilaremia (Mf) before treatment with a single oral dose of IDA or DA. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored actively for two days and passively for five more days. Persons with positive CFA or Mf tests at baseline were retested 12-months post-treatment to assess treatment efficacy. Baseline CFA and Mf-rates were 26.4% and 6.9% in IDA and 24.5% and 6.4% in DA villages respectively. 4758 and 4160 participants received IDA and DA. Most AEs were mild after both treatments; fewer than 0.1% of participants experienced AEs with severity > grade 1. No serious AEs were observed. Fever, headache and dizziness were the most common AEs. AE rates were slightly higher after IDA than DA (8.3% vs. 6.4%, P<0.01). AEs were more frequent in females and Mf-positives after either treatment, but significantly more frequent after IDA (40.5% vs 20.2%, P < 0.001). IDA was more effective for clearing Mf than DA (84% vs. 61.8%, P < 0.001). Geometric mean Mf counts per 60μl in retested Mf-positives decreased by 96.4% from 11.8 after IDA and by 90.0% from 9.5 after DA. Neither treatment was effective for clearing CFA. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IDA had an acceptable safety profile and was more effective for clearing Mf than DA. With adequate compliance and medical support to manage AEs, IDA has the potential to accelerate LF elimination in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI No/2016/10/007399) Public Library of Science 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7909694/ /pubmed/33591979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009069 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jambulingam, Purushothaman
Kuttiatt, Vijesh Sreedhar
Krishnamoorthy, Kaliannagounder
Subramanian, Swaminathan
Srividya, Adinarayanan
Raju, Hari Kishan K.
Rahi, Manju
Somani, Roopali K.
Suryaprakash, Mallanna K.
Dwivedi, Gangeshwar P.
Weil, Gary J.
An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title_full An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title_fullStr An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title_full_unstemmed An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title_short An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India
title_sort open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7909694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009069
work_keys_str_mv AT jambulingampurushothaman anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT kuttiattvijeshsreedhar anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT krishnamoorthykaliannagounder anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT subramanianswaminathan anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT srividyaadinarayanan anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT rajuharikishank anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT rahimanju anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT somaniroopalik anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT suryaprakashmallannak anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT dwivedigangeshwarp anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT weilgaryj anopenlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT jambulingampurushothaman openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT kuttiattvijeshsreedhar openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT krishnamoorthykaliannagounder openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT subramanianswaminathan openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT srividyaadinarayanan openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT rajuharikishank openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT rahimanju openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT somaniroopalik openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT suryaprakashmallannak openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT dwivedigangeshwarp openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia
AT weilgaryj openlabelblockrandomizedcommunitystudyofthesafetyandefficacyofcoadministeredivermectindiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazolevsdiethylcarbamazineplusalbendazoleforlymphaticfilariasisinindia