Cargando…

Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?

BACKGROUND: Young infants with a possible serious bacterial infection (SBI) are a very common presentation to emergency centres (ECs). It is often difficult to distinguish clinically between self-limiting viral infections and an SBI. Available evaluation algorithms to assist clinicians are mostly fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lishman, Juanita, Smit, Liezl, Redfern, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.015
_version_ 1783656072597209088
author Lishman, Juanita
Smit, Liezl
Redfern, Andrew
author_facet Lishman, Juanita
Smit, Liezl
Redfern, Andrew
author_sort Lishman, Juanita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young infants with a possible serious bacterial infection (SBI) are a very common presentation to emergency centres (ECs). It is often difficult to distinguish clinically between self-limiting viral infections and an SBI. Available evaluation algorithms to assist clinicians are mostly from high-income countries. Data to inform clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To determine the period prevalence of SBI and invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and describe current practice in the assessment and management of young infants aged 21–90 days presenting with a possible SBI to a Paediatric Emergency centre (PEC) in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional review of infants 21–90 days old presenting to the Tygerberg Hospital PED between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2016. RESULTS: A total of 248 infants 21–90 days were included in the study. Sixty-two patients (25%, 95% CI 20–30) had an SBI and 13 (5.2%, 95% CI 3–8) had an IBI. One hundred and sixty-five infants had a possible SBI based on WHO IMCI criteria. The sensitivity of the WHO IMCI criteria in detecting SBI was 82.3% (95% CI 70.5–90.8) and the specificity 38.7% (95% CI 31.7–46.1). More than half (51.2%) of the infants received antibiotics within the 48 h prior to presentation, of which 33.5% included intramuscular injection of Ceftriaxone. Only 20 (8.0%) patients in this age group were discharged home after initial evaluation. A significant relationship was noted between fever and the risk of SBI (p-value 0.010) and IBI (p-value 0.009). There also appeared to be a significant relationship between nutritional status and IBI (p-value 0.013). CONCLUSION: Period prevalence of SBI and IBI was higher compared to that published in the literature. Validated evaluation algorithms to stratify risk of SBI are needed to assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing infants appropriately in low- and middle-income settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher African Federation for Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79101582021-03-05 Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector? Lishman, Juanita Smit, Liezl Redfern, Andrew Afr J Emerg Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Young infants with a possible serious bacterial infection (SBI) are a very common presentation to emergency centres (ECs). It is often difficult to distinguish clinically between self-limiting viral infections and an SBI. Available evaluation algorithms to assist clinicians are mostly from high-income countries. Data to inform clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To determine the period prevalence of SBI and invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and describe current practice in the assessment and management of young infants aged 21–90 days presenting with a possible SBI to a Paediatric Emergency centre (PEC) in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional review of infants 21–90 days old presenting to the Tygerberg Hospital PED between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2016. RESULTS: A total of 248 infants 21–90 days were included in the study. Sixty-two patients (25%, 95% CI 20–30) had an SBI and 13 (5.2%, 95% CI 3–8) had an IBI. One hundred and sixty-five infants had a possible SBI based on WHO IMCI criteria. The sensitivity of the WHO IMCI criteria in detecting SBI was 82.3% (95% CI 70.5–90.8) and the specificity 38.7% (95% CI 31.7–46.1). More than half (51.2%) of the infants received antibiotics within the 48 h prior to presentation, of which 33.5% included intramuscular injection of Ceftriaxone. Only 20 (8.0%) patients in this age group were discharged home after initial evaluation. A significant relationship was noted between fever and the risk of SBI (p-value 0.010) and IBI (p-value 0.009). There also appeared to be a significant relationship between nutritional status and IBI (p-value 0.013). CONCLUSION: Period prevalence of SBI and IBI was higher compared to that published in the literature. Validated evaluation algorithms to stratify risk of SBI are needed to assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing infants appropriately in low- and middle-income settings. African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2021-03 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7910158/ /pubmed/33680738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.015 Text en © 2020 African Federation for Emergency Medicine. Publishing services provided by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lishman, Juanita
Smit, Liezl
Redfern, Andrew
Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title_full Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title_fullStr Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title_full_unstemmed Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title_short Infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the South African public health sector?
title_sort infants 21–90 days presenting with a possible serious bacterial infection – are evaluation algorithms from high income countries applicable in the south african public health sector?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.015
work_keys_str_mv AT lishmanjuanita infants2190dayspresentingwithapossibleseriousbacterialinfectionareevaluationalgorithmsfromhighincomecountriesapplicableinthesouthafricanpublichealthsector
AT smitliezl infants2190dayspresentingwithapossibleseriousbacterialinfectionareevaluationalgorithmsfromhighincomecountriesapplicableinthesouthafricanpublichealthsector
AT redfernandrew infants2190dayspresentingwithapossibleseriousbacterialinfectionareevaluationalgorithmsfromhighincomecountriesapplicableinthesouthafricanpublichealthsector