HFOV vs CMV for neonates with moderate-to-severe perinatal onset acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS): a propensity score analysis

This study aimed to evaluate whether high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) could reduce mortality and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) of perinatal-onset neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Medical records were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among the 700 neonates with NARDS who needed invasive ventilation, 501 (71.6%) received CMV, while 199 (28.4%) received HFOV. One-to-one propensity score matching (127:127) was used to match the baseline characteristics of patients who received CMV and HFOV. The results showed that birth weight and oxygenation index (OI) were independently associated with mortality in the multivariate logistic regression. No significant differences were observed in mortality or the incidence of BPD between the two groups. The incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and ventilation-free days were significantly lower in the HFOV group than in the CMV group (3.9 vs 11.80%, p=0.02; 15.226 vs 20.967 days, p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: HFOV was associated with a decreased incidence of IVH in infants with NARDS compared with CMV. However, there were significantly more VFDs in the CMV group than in the HFOV group, and HFOV did not appear to be superior to CMV in decreasing the mortality and incidence of BPD in infants with NARDS.