Cargando…

Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical outcomes of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangement (ABCR) carriers in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles by next-generation sequencing following microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier embry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Dehua, Hu, Liang, Gong, Fei, Yuan, Shimin, Luo, Keli, Wu, Xianhong, Xie, Pingyuan, Lu, Changfu, Lu, Guangxiu, Tan, Yue-Qiu, Lin, Ge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02052-6
_version_ 1783656110164541440
author Cheng, Dehua
Hu, Liang
Gong, Fei
Yuan, Shimin
Luo, Keli
Wu, Xianhong
Xie, Pingyuan
Lu, Changfu
Lu, Guangxiu
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Lin, Ge
author_facet Cheng, Dehua
Hu, Liang
Gong, Fei
Yuan, Shimin
Luo, Keli
Wu, Xianhong
Xie, Pingyuan
Lu, Changfu
Lu, Guangxiu
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Lin, Ge
author_sort Cheng, Dehua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical outcomes of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangement (ABCR) carriers in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles by next-generation sequencing following microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier embryos from balanced carriers. METHODS: A retrospective study of 762 ABCR carrier couples who requested PGT for structural rearrangements combined with MicroSeq at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya was conducted between October 2014 and October 2019. RESULTS: Trophectoderm biopsy was performed in 4122 blastocysts derived from 917 PGT-SR cycles and 3781 blastocysts were detected. Among the 3781 blastocysts diagnosed, 1433 (37.9%, 1433/3781) were balanced, of which 739 blastocysts were carriers (51.57%, 739/1433) and 694 blastocysts were normal (48.43%, 694/1433). Approximately 26.39% of cycles had both carrier and normal embryo transfer, and the average number of biopsied blastocysts was 6.7. In the cumulative 223 biopsied cycles with normal embryo transfer, all couples chose to transfer the normal embryos. In the 225 cycles with only carrier embryos, the couples chose to transfer the carrier embryos in 169/225 (75.11%) cycles. A total of 732 frozen embryo transfer cycles were performed, resulting in 502 clinical pregnancies. Cumulatively, 326 babies were born; all of these babies were healthy and free of any developmental issues. CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first evaluation of the clinical outcomes of a large sample with ABCR carrier couples undergoing the MicroSeq-PGT technique and reveals its powerful ability to distinguish between carrier and non-carrier balanced embryos. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-020-02052-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79103862021-03-15 Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement Cheng, Dehua Hu, Liang Gong, Fei Yuan, Shimin Luo, Keli Wu, Xianhong Xie, Pingyuan Lu, Changfu Lu, Guangxiu Tan, Yue-Qiu Lin, Ge J Assist Reprod Genet Genetics PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical outcomes of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangement (ABCR) carriers in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles by next-generation sequencing following microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier embryos from balanced carriers. METHODS: A retrospective study of 762 ABCR carrier couples who requested PGT for structural rearrangements combined with MicroSeq at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya was conducted between October 2014 and October 2019. RESULTS: Trophectoderm biopsy was performed in 4122 blastocysts derived from 917 PGT-SR cycles and 3781 blastocysts were detected. Among the 3781 blastocysts diagnosed, 1433 (37.9%, 1433/3781) were balanced, of which 739 blastocysts were carriers (51.57%, 739/1433) and 694 blastocysts were normal (48.43%, 694/1433). Approximately 26.39% of cycles had both carrier and normal embryo transfer, and the average number of biopsied blastocysts was 6.7. In the cumulative 223 biopsied cycles with normal embryo transfer, all couples chose to transfer the normal embryos. In the 225 cycles with only carrier embryos, the couples chose to transfer the carrier embryos in 169/225 (75.11%) cycles. A total of 732 frozen embryo transfer cycles were performed, resulting in 502 clinical pregnancies. Cumulatively, 326 babies were born; all of these babies were healthy and free of any developmental issues. CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first evaluation of the clinical outcomes of a large sample with ABCR carrier couples undergoing the MicroSeq-PGT technique and reveals its powerful ability to distinguish between carrier and non-carrier balanced embryos. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-020-02052-6. Springer US 2021-01-11 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7910386/ /pubmed/33432423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02052-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Genetics
Cheng, Dehua
Hu, Liang
Gong, Fei
Yuan, Shimin
Luo, Keli
Wu, Xianhong
Xie, Pingyuan
Lu, Changfu
Lu, Guangxiu
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Lin, Ge
Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title_full Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title_short Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
title_sort clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02052-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chengdehua clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT huliang clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT gongfei clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT yuanshimin clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT luokeli clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT wuxianhong clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT xiepingyuan clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT luchangfu clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT luguangxiu clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT tanyueqiu clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement
AT linge clinicaloutcomesfollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingandmicrodissectingjunctionregionincoupleswithbalancedchromosomerearrangement