Cargando…

Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach

Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) have a core impairment in the communicative-pragmatic domain, characterized by severe difficulties in correctly inferring the speaker’s communicative intentions. While several studies have investigated pragmatic performance of patients with SCZ, little research has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parola, Alberto, Brasso, Claudio, Morese, Rosalba, Rocca, Paola, Bosco, Francesca M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00142-7
_version_ 1783656140849020928
author Parola, Alberto
Brasso, Claudio
Morese, Rosalba
Rocca, Paola
Bosco, Francesca M.
author_facet Parola, Alberto
Brasso, Claudio
Morese, Rosalba
Rocca, Paola
Bosco, Francesca M.
author_sort Parola, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) have a core impairment in the communicative-pragmatic domain, characterized by severe difficulties in correctly inferring the speaker’s communicative intentions. While several studies have investigated pragmatic performance of patients with SCZ, little research has analyzed the errors committed in the comprehension of different communicative acts. The present research investigated error patterns in 24 patients with SCZ and 24 healthy controls (HC) during a task assessing the comprehension of different communicative acts, i.e., sincere, deceitful and ironic, and their relationship with the clinical features of SCZ. We used signal detection analysis to quantify participants’ ability to correctly detect the speakers’ communicative intention, i.e., sensitivity, and their tendency to wrongly perceive a communicative intention when not present, i.e., response bias. Further, we investigated the relationship between sensitivity and response bias, and the clinical features of the disorder, namely symptom severity, pharmacotherapy, and personal and social functioning. The results showed that the ability to infer the speaker’s communicative intention is impaired in SCZ, as patients exhibited lower sensitivity, compared to HC, for all the pragmatic phenomena evaluated, i.e., sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts. Further, we found that the sensitivity measure for irony was related to disorganized/concrete symptoms. Moreover, patients with SCZ showed a stronger response bias for deceitful communicative acts compared to HC: when committing errors, they tended to misattribute deceitful intentions more often than sincere and ironic ones. This tendency to misattribute deceitful communicative intentions may be related to the attributional bias characterizing the disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79105442021-03-04 Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach Parola, Alberto Brasso, Claudio Morese, Rosalba Rocca, Paola Bosco, Francesca M. NPJ Schizophr Article Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) have a core impairment in the communicative-pragmatic domain, characterized by severe difficulties in correctly inferring the speaker’s communicative intentions. While several studies have investigated pragmatic performance of patients with SCZ, little research has analyzed the errors committed in the comprehension of different communicative acts. The present research investigated error patterns in 24 patients with SCZ and 24 healthy controls (HC) during a task assessing the comprehension of different communicative acts, i.e., sincere, deceitful and ironic, and their relationship with the clinical features of SCZ. We used signal detection analysis to quantify participants’ ability to correctly detect the speakers’ communicative intention, i.e., sensitivity, and their tendency to wrongly perceive a communicative intention when not present, i.e., response bias. Further, we investigated the relationship between sensitivity and response bias, and the clinical features of the disorder, namely symptom severity, pharmacotherapy, and personal and social functioning. The results showed that the ability to infer the speaker’s communicative intention is impaired in SCZ, as patients exhibited lower sensitivity, compared to HC, for all the pragmatic phenomena evaluated, i.e., sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts. Further, we found that the sensitivity measure for irony was related to disorganized/concrete symptoms. Moreover, patients with SCZ showed a stronger response bias for deceitful communicative acts compared to HC: when committing errors, they tended to misattribute deceitful intentions more often than sincere and ironic ones. This tendency to misattribute deceitful communicative intentions may be related to the attributional bias characterizing the disorder. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7910544/ /pubmed/33637736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00142-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Parola, Alberto
Brasso, Claudio
Morese, Rosalba
Rocca, Paola
Bosco, Francesca M.
Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title_full Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title_fullStr Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title_full_unstemmed Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title_short Understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
title_sort understanding communicative intentions in schizophrenia using an error analysis approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33637736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00142-7
work_keys_str_mv AT parolaalberto understandingcommunicativeintentionsinschizophreniausinganerroranalysisapproach
AT brassoclaudio understandingcommunicativeintentionsinschizophreniausinganerroranalysisapproach
AT moreserosalba understandingcommunicativeintentionsinschizophreniausinganerroranalysisapproach
AT roccapaola understandingcommunicativeintentionsinschizophreniausinganerroranalysisapproach
AT boscofrancescam understandingcommunicativeintentionsinschizophreniausinganerroranalysisapproach