Cargando…

Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA

BACKGROUND: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment option. Healing of the greater tuberosity (GT) is associated with better outcomes. It was the aim of this cadaver study to compare the stability of GT r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grubhofer, Florian, Bachmann, Elias, Gerber, Christian, Wieser, Karl, Ernstbrunner, Lukas, Warner, Jon JP., Bouaicha, Samy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.016
_version_ 1783656179260456960
author Grubhofer, Florian
Bachmann, Elias
Gerber, Christian
Wieser, Karl
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Warner, Jon JP.
Bouaicha, Samy
author_facet Grubhofer, Florian
Bachmann, Elias
Gerber, Christian
Wieser, Karl
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Warner, Jon JP.
Bouaicha, Samy
author_sort Grubhofer, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment option. Healing of the greater tuberosity (GT) is associated with better outcomes. It was the aim of this cadaver study to compare the stability of GT refixation obtained with the so-called “cow hitch” cerclage fixation with that of the recommended standard suture cerclage technique. METHODS: A 4-part proximal humerus fracture was created in 10 fresh-frozen, human cadaveric shoulders. A CT was performed preoperatively to ensure the comparability of bone density and fracture patterns. In the experimental group the GT was reattached to the stem of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage (CH) technique, the conventional (CON) technique recommended for the tested implant was used in the control group. Humeri were tested with a uniaxial material testing machine. In total, 5000 loading cycles with forces from 250 to 350N were applied while motion (in mm) of the tuberosities was recorded with a telecentric camera. RESULTS: After 5000 loading cycles, the CH group showed a significantly smaller displacement of the bone fragment (0.74 ± 0.31 mm) than the CON group [2.29 ± 1.08 mm (P < .05)]. After the first three cycles the mean displacement was 0.14 mm (±0.12) in the CH and 1.42 mm (±0.21) in the CON (P < .0001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: GT reattachment with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage showed a significantly more stable fixation compared with the currently for the used prosthetic system recommended suture cerclage technique in an in vitro 4-part proximal humeral fracture model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79107252021-03-04 Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA Grubhofer, Florian Bachmann, Elias Gerber, Christian Wieser, Karl Ernstbrunner, Lukas Warner, Jon JP. Bouaicha, Samy JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment option. Healing of the greater tuberosity (GT) is associated with better outcomes. It was the aim of this cadaver study to compare the stability of GT refixation obtained with the so-called “cow hitch” cerclage fixation with that of the recommended standard suture cerclage technique. METHODS: A 4-part proximal humerus fracture was created in 10 fresh-frozen, human cadaveric shoulders. A CT was performed preoperatively to ensure the comparability of bone density and fracture patterns. In the experimental group the GT was reattached to the stem of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage (CH) technique, the conventional (CON) technique recommended for the tested implant was used in the control group. Humeri were tested with a uniaxial material testing machine. In total, 5000 loading cycles with forces from 250 to 350N were applied while motion (in mm) of the tuberosities was recorded with a telecentric camera. RESULTS: After 5000 loading cycles, the CH group showed a significantly smaller displacement of the bone fragment (0.74 ± 0.31 mm) than the CON group [2.29 ± 1.08 mm (P < .05)]. After the first three cycles the mean displacement was 0.14 mm (±0.12) in the CH and 1.42 mm (±0.21) in the CON (P < .0001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: GT reattachment with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage showed a significantly more stable fixation compared with the currently for the used prosthetic system recommended suture cerclage technique in an in vitro 4-part proximal humeral fracture model. Elsevier 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7910725/ /pubmed/33681848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.016 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Grubhofer, Florian
Bachmann, Elias
Gerber, Christian
Wieser, Karl
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Warner, Jon JP.
Bouaicha, Samy
Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title_full Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title_fullStr Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title_full_unstemmed Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title_short Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA
title_sort cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture rtsa
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.016
work_keys_str_mv AT grubhoferflorian cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT bachmannelias cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT gerberchristian cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT wieserkarl cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT ernstbrunnerlukas cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT warnerjonjp cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa
AT bouaichasamy cowhitchsuturecerclageforfixationofthegreatertuberosityinfracturertsa