Cargando…

Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that specific variants of scapular morphology are associated with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability. To this date, observations regarding glenoid and/or acromial variants were analyzed independently, with two-dimensional imaging or without comparison wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beeler, Silvan, Leoty, Laura, Hochreiter, Bettina, Carrillo, Fabio, Götschi, Tobias, Fischer, Tim, Fürnstahl, Philipp, Gerber, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.003
_version_ 1783656179940982784
author Beeler, Silvan
Leoty, Laura
Hochreiter, Bettina
Carrillo, Fabio
Götschi, Tobias
Fischer, Tim
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Gerber, Christian
author_facet Beeler, Silvan
Leoty, Laura
Hochreiter, Bettina
Carrillo, Fabio
Götschi, Tobias
Fischer, Tim
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Gerber, Christian
author_sort Beeler, Silvan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is evidence that specific variants of scapular morphology are associated with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability. To this date, observations regarding glenoid and/or acromial variants were analyzed independently, with two-dimensional imaging or without comparison with a healthy control group. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the three-dimensional (3D) shape of the scapula in healthy and in shoulders with static or dynamic posterior instability using 3D surface models and 3D measurement methods. METHODS: In this study, 30 patients with unidirectional posterior instability and 20 patients with static posterior humeral head subluxation (static posterior instability, Walch B1) were analyzed. Both cohorts were compared with a control group of 40 patients with stable, centered shoulders and without any clinical symptoms. 3D surface models were obtained through segmentation of computed tomography images and 3D measurements were performed for glenoid (version and inclination) and acromion (tilt, coverage, height). RESULTS: Overall, the scapulae of patients with dynamic and static instability differed only marginally among themselves. Compared with the control group, the glenoid was 2.5° (P = .032), respectively, 5.7° (P = .001) more retroverted and 2.9° (P = .025), respectively, 3.7° (P = .014) more downward tilted in dynamic, respectively, static instability. The acromial roof of dynamic instability was significantly higher and on average 6.2° (P = .007) less posterior covering with an increased posterior acromial height of +4.8mm (P = .001). The acromial roof of static instability was on average 4.8° (P = .041) more externally rotated (axial tilt), 7.3° (P = .004) flatter (sagittal tilt), 8.3° (P = .001) less posterior covered with an increased posterior acromial height of +5.8 mm (0.001). CONCLUSION: The scapula of shoulders with dynamic and static posterior instability is characterized by an increased glenoid retroversion and an acromion that is shorter posterolaterally, higher, and more horizontal in the sagittal plane. All these deviations from the normal scapula values were more pronounced in static posterior instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79107282021-03-04 Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability Beeler, Silvan Leoty, Laura Hochreiter, Bettina Carrillo, Fabio Götschi, Tobias Fischer, Tim Fürnstahl, Philipp Gerber, Christian JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: There is evidence that specific variants of scapular morphology are associated with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability. To this date, observations regarding glenoid and/or acromial variants were analyzed independently, with two-dimensional imaging or without comparison with a healthy control group. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the three-dimensional (3D) shape of the scapula in healthy and in shoulders with static or dynamic posterior instability using 3D surface models and 3D measurement methods. METHODS: In this study, 30 patients with unidirectional posterior instability and 20 patients with static posterior humeral head subluxation (static posterior instability, Walch B1) were analyzed. Both cohorts were compared with a control group of 40 patients with stable, centered shoulders and without any clinical symptoms. 3D surface models were obtained through segmentation of computed tomography images and 3D measurements were performed for glenoid (version and inclination) and acromion (tilt, coverage, height). RESULTS: Overall, the scapulae of patients with dynamic and static instability differed only marginally among themselves. Compared with the control group, the glenoid was 2.5° (P = .032), respectively, 5.7° (P = .001) more retroverted and 2.9° (P = .025), respectively, 3.7° (P = .014) more downward tilted in dynamic, respectively, static instability. The acromial roof of dynamic instability was significantly higher and on average 6.2° (P = .007) less posterior covering with an increased posterior acromial height of +4.8mm (P = .001). The acromial roof of static instability was on average 4.8° (P = .041) more externally rotated (axial tilt), 7.3° (P = .004) flatter (sagittal tilt), 8.3° (P = .001) less posterior covered with an increased posterior acromial height of +5.8 mm (0.001). CONCLUSION: The scapula of shoulders with dynamic and static posterior instability is characterized by an increased glenoid retroversion and an acromion that is shorter posterolaterally, higher, and more horizontal in the sagittal plane. All these deviations from the normal scapula values were more pronounced in static posterior instability. Elsevier 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7910728/ /pubmed/33681835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Beeler, Silvan
Leoty, Laura
Hochreiter, Bettina
Carrillo, Fabio
Götschi, Tobias
Fischer, Tim
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Gerber, Christian
Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title_full Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title_fullStr Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title_full_unstemmed Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title_short Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
title_sort similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT beelersilvan similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT leotylaura similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT hochreiterbettina similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT carrillofabio similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT gotschitobias similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT fischertim similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT furnstahlphilipp similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability
AT gerberchristian similarscapularmorphologyinpatientswithdynamicandstaticposteriorshoulderinstability