Cargando…

Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the modified Fragility Index (mFI) would predict complications in patients older than 50 years who underwent operative intervention for a proximal humerus fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Daniel R., Saltzman, Eliana B., Anastasio, Albert T., Guisse, Ndeye F., Belay, Elshaday S., Pidgeon, Tyler S., Richard, Marc J., Ruch, David S., Anakwenze, Oke A., Gage, Mark J., Klifto, Christopher S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.017
_version_ 1783656180410744832
author Evans, Daniel R.
Saltzman, Eliana B.
Anastasio, Albert T.
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Belay, Elshaday S.
Pidgeon, Tyler S.
Richard, Marc J.
Ruch, David S.
Anakwenze, Oke A.
Gage, Mark J.
Klifto, Christopher S.
author_facet Evans, Daniel R.
Saltzman, Eliana B.
Anastasio, Albert T.
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Belay, Elshaday S.
Pidgeon, Tyler S.
Richard, Marc J.
Ruch, David S.
Anakwenze, Oke A.
Gage, Mark J.
Klifto, Christopher S.
author_sort Evans, Daniel R.
collection PubMed
description HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the modified Fragility Index (mFI) would predict complications in patients older than 50 years who underwent operative intervention for a proximal humerus fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database, including patients older than 50 years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture. A 5-item mFI score was then calculated for each patient. Postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates as well as length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariable statistical analyses were performed, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, LOS, and operative time. RESULTS: We identified 2,004 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range: 59-74), of which 76.2% were female. As mFI increased from 0 to 2 or greater, 30-day readmission rate increased from 2.8% to 6.7% (P-value = .005), rate of discharge to rehabilitation facility increased from 7.1% to 25.3% (P-value < .001), and rates of any complication increased from 6.5% to 13.9% (P-value < .001). Specifically, the rates of renal and hematologic complications increased significantly in patients with mFI of 2 or greater (P-value = .042 and P-value < .001, respectively). Compared with patients with mFI of 0, patients with mFI of 2 or greater were 2 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio = 2.2, P-value .026). In addition, patients with mFI of 2 or greater had an increased odds of discharge to a rehabilitation center (odds ratio = 2.3, P-value < .001). However, increased fragility was not significantly associated with an increased odds of 30-day reoperation or any complication after controlling for demographic data, LOS, and operative time. CONCLUSION: An increasing level of fragility is predictive of readmission and discharge to a rehabilitation center after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Our data suggest that a simple fragility evaluation can help inform surgical decision-making and counseling in patients older than 50 years with proximal humerus fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79107302021-03-04 Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures Evans, Daniel R. Saltzman, Eliana B. Anastasio, Albert T. Guisse, Ndeye F. Belay, Elshaday S. Pidgeon, Tyler S. Richard, Marc J. Ruch, David S. Anakwenze, Oke A. Gage, Mark J. Klifto, Christopher S. JSES Int Shoulder HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the modified Fragility Index (mFI) would predict complications in patients older than 50 years who underwent operative intervention for a proximal humerus fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database, including patients older than 50 years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture. A 5-item mFI score was then calculated for each patient. Postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates as well as length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariable statistical analyses were performed, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, LOS, and operative time. RESULTS: We identified 2,004 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range: 59-74), of which 76.2% were female. As mFI increased from 0 to 2 or greater, 30-day readmission rate increased from 2.8% to 6.7% (P-value = .005), rate of discharge to rehabilitation facility increased from 7.1% to 25.3% (P-value < .001), and rates of any complication increased from 6.5% to 13.9% (P-value < .001). Specifically, the rates of renal and hematologic complications increased significantly in patients with mFI of 2 or greater (P-value = .042 and P-value < .001, respectively). Compared with patients with mFI of 0, patients with mFI of 2 or greater were 2 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio = 2.2, P-value .026). In addition, patients with mFI of 2 or greater had an increased odds of discharge to a rehabilitation center (odds ratio = 2.3, P-value < .001). However, increased fragility was not significantly associated with an increased odds of 30-day reoperation or any complication after controlling for demographic data, LOS, and operative time. CONCLUSION: An increasing level of fragility is predictive of readmission and discharge to a rehabilitation center after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Our data suggest that a simple fragility evaluation can help inform surgical decision-making and counseling in patients older than 50 years with proximal humerus fractures. Elsevier 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7910730/ /pubmed/33681840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.017 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Evans, Daniel R.
Saltzman, Eliana B.
Anastasio, Albert T.
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Belay, Elshaday S.
Pidgeon, Tyler S.
Richard, Marc J.
Ruch, David S.
Anakwenze, Oke A.
Gage, Mark J.
Klifto, Christopher S.
Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title_full Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title_fullStr Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title_full_unstemmed Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title_short Use of a 5-item modified Fragility Index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
title_sort use of a 5-item modified fragility index for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.017
work_keys_str_mv AT evansdanielr useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT saltzmanelianab useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT anastasioalbertt useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT guissendeyef useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT belayelshadays useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT pidgeontylers useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT richardmarcj useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT ruchdavids useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT anakwenzeokea useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT gagemarkj useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures
AT kliftochristophers useofa5itemmodifiedfragilityindexforriskstratificationinpatientsundergoingsurgicalmanagementofproximalhumerusfractures