Cargando…

Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute low back pain frequently request diagnostic imaging, and clinicians feel pressure to acquiesce to such requests to sustain patient trust and satisfaction. Spinal imaging in patients with acute low back pain poses risks from diagnostic evaluation of false-positive find...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fenton, Joshua J., Jerant, Anthony, Franks, Peter, Gosdin, Melissa, Fridman, Ilona, Cipri, Camille, Weinberg, Gary, Hudnut, Andrew, Tancredi, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x
_version_ 1783656193434058752
author Fenton, Joshua J.
Jerant, Anthony
Franks, Peter
Gosdin, Melissa
Fridman, Ilona
Cipri, Camille
Weinberg, Gary
Hudnut, Andrew
Tancredi, Daniel J.
author_facet Fenton, Joshua J.
Jerant, Anthony
Franks, Peter
Gosdin, Melissa
Fridman, Ilona
Cipri, Camille
Weinberg, Gary
Hudnut, Andrew
Tancredi, Daniel J.
author_sort Fenton, Joshua J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with acute low back pain frequently request diagnostic imaging, and clinicians feel pressure to acquiesce to such requests to sustain patient trust and satisfaction. Spinal imaging in patients with acute low back pain poses risks from diagnostic evaluation of false-positive findings, patient labeling and anxiety, and unnecessary treatment (including spinal surgery). Watchful waiting advice has been an effective strategy to reduce some low-value treatments, and some evidence suggests a watchful waiting approach would be acceptable to many patients requesting diagnostic tests. METHODS: We will use key informant interviews of clinicians and focus groups with primary care patients to refine a theory-informed standardized patient-based intervention designed to teach clinicians how to advise watchful waiting when patients request low-value spinal imaging for low back pain. We will test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. We will recruit 8–10 primary care and urgent care clinics (~ 55 clinicians) in Sacramento, CA; clinicians will be randomized 1:1 to intervention and control groups. Over a 3- to 6-month period, clinicians in the intervention group will receive 3 visits with standardized patient instructors (SPIs) portraying patients with acute back pain; SPIs will instruct clinicians in a three-step model emphasizing establishing trust, empathic communication, and negotiation of a watchful waiting approach. Control physicians will receive no intervention. The primary outcome is the post-intervention rate of spinal imaging among actual patients with acute back pain seen by the clinicians adjusted for rate of imaging during a baseline period. Secondary outcomes are use of targeted communication techniques during a follow-up visit with an SP, clinician self-reported use of watchful waiting with actual low back pain patients, post-intervention rates of diagnostic imaging for other musculoskeletal pain syndromes (to test for generalization of intervention effects beyond back pain), and patient trust and satisfaction with physicians. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine whether standardized patient instructors can help clinicians develop skill in negotiating a watchful waiting approach with patients with acute low back pain, thereby reducing rates of low-value spinal imaging. The trial will also examine the possibility that intervention effects generalize to other diagnostic tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT 04255199. Registered on January 20, 2020
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7910785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79107852021-03-01 Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial Fenton, Joshua J. Jerant, Anthony Franks, Peter Gosdin, Melissa Fridman, Ilona Cipri, Camille Weinberg, Gary Hudnut, Andrew Tancredi, Daniel J. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients with acute low back pain frequently request diagnostic imaging, and clinicians feel pressure to acquiesce to such requests to sustain patient trust and satisfaction. Spinal imaging in patients with acute low back pain poses risks from diagnostic evaluation of false-positive findings, patient labeling and anxiety, and unnecessary treatment (including spinal surgery). Watchful waiting advice has been an effective strategy to reduce some low-value treatments, and some evidence suggests a watchful waiting approach would be acceptable to many patients requesting diagnostic tests. METHODS: We will use key informant interviews of clinicians and focus groups with primary care patients to refine a theory-informed standardized patient-based intervention designed to teach clinicians how to advise watchful waiting when patients request low-value spinal imaging for low back pain. We will test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. We will recruit 8–10 primary care and urgent care clinics (~ 55 clinicians) in Sacramento, CA; clinicians will be randomized 1:1 to intervention and control groups. Over a 3- to 6-month period, clinicians in the intervention group will receive 3 visits with standardized patient instructors (SPIs) portraying patients with acute back pain; SPIs will instruct clinicians in a three-step model emphasizing establishing trust, empathic communication, and negotiation of a watchful waiting approach. Control physicians will receive no intervention. The primary outcome is the post-intervention rate of spinal imaging among actual patients with acute back pain seen by the clinicians adjusted for rate of imaging during a baseline period. Secondary outcomes are use of targeted communication techniques during a follow-up visit with an SP, clinician self-reported use of watchful waiting with actual low back pain patients, post-intervention rates of diagnostic imaging for other musculoskeletal pain syndromes (to test for generalization of intervention effects beyond back pain), and patient trust and satisfaction with physicians. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine whether standardized patient instructors can help clinicians develop skill in negotiating a watchful waiting approach with patients with acute low back pain, thereby reducing rates of low-value spinal imaging. The trial will also examine the possibility that intervention effects generalize to other diagnostic tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT 04255199. Registered on January 20, 2020 BioMed Central 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7910785/ /pubmed/33639993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fenton, Joshua J.
Jerant, Anthony
Franks, Peter
Gosdin, Melissa
Fridman, Ilona
Cipri, Camille
Weinberg, Gary
Hudnut, Andrew
Tancredi, Daniel J.
Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_fullStr Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_short Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_sort watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fentonjoshuaj watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT jerantanthony watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT frankspeter watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT gosdinmelissa watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT fridmanilona watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT cipricamille watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT weinberggary watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT hudnutandrew watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT tancredidanielj watchfulwaitingasastrategytoreducelowvaluespinalimagingstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial