Cargando…
Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals is a major public health concern worldwide due to the animals’ zoonotic potential and ability to act as a reservoir for resistant genes. We report on the first use of meta-analysis and a systematic review to analyze the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7911405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020138 |
_version_ | 1783656333829996544 |
---|---|
author | Wada, Yusuf Irekeola, Ahmad Adebayo E.A.R., Engku Nur Syafirah Yusof, Wardah Lih Huey, Lee Ladan Muhammad, Suwaiba Harun, Azian Yean, Chan Yean Zaidah, Abdul Rahman |
author_facet | Wada, Yusuf Irekeola, Ahmad Adebayo E.A.R., Engku Nur Syafirah Yusof, Wardah Lih Huey, Lee Ladan Muhammad, Suwaiba Harun, Azian Yean, Chan Yean Zaidah, Abdul Rahman |
author_sort | Wada, Yusuf |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals is a major public health concern worldwide due to the animals’ zoonotic potential and ability to act as a reservoir for resistant genes. We report on the first use of meta-analysis and a systematic review to analyze the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in companion animals. Databases such as MedLib, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched. The information was extracted by two independent reviewers and the results were reviewed by a third. Two reviewers independently assessed the study protocol using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and the study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for prevalence data. OpenMeta analyst and comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) were used for the meta-analysis. The random effect model was used, and publication bias was assessed using the Eggers test and funnel plot. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed, and the sources were analyzed using the leave-one-out meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria, but because some studies reported the prevalence of VRE in more than one companion animal, they were considered as individual studies, and 35 studies were therefore added to the final meta-analysis. Sampling period of the included studies was from 1995–2018. Of the 4288 isolates tested in the included studies, 1241 were VRE. The pooled prevalence of VRE in companion animals was estimated at 14.6% (95% CI; 8.7–23.5%; I(2) = 97.10%; p < 0.001). Between-study variability was high (t(2) = 2.859; heterogeneity I(2) = 97.10% with heterogeneity chi-square (Q) = 1173.346, degrees of freedom (df) = 34, and p < 0.001). The funnel plot showed bias, which was confirmed by Eggers test (t-value = 3.97165; p = 0.00036), and estimates from the leave-one-out forest plot did not affect the pooled prevalence. Pooled prevalence of VRE in dogs and cats were 18.2% (CI = 9.4–32.5%) and 12.3%, CI = 3.8–33.1%), respectively. More studies were reported in Europe than in any other continent, with most studies using feces as the sample type and disc diffusion as the detection method. With the emergence of resistant strains, new antimicrobials are required in veterinary medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7911405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79114052021-02-28 Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Wada, Yusuf Irekeola, Ahmad Adebayo E.A.R., Engku Nur Syafirah Yusof, Wardah Lih Huey, Lee Ladan Muhammad, Suwaiba Harun, Azian Yean, Chan Yean Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Antibiotics (Basel) Article Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals is a major public health concern worldwide due to the animals’ zoonotic potential and ability to act as a reservoir for resistant genes. We report on the first use of meta-analysis and a systematic review to analyze the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in companion animals. Databases such as MedLib, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched. The information was extracted by two independent reviewers and the results were reviewed by a third. Two reviewers independently assessed the study protocol using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and the study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for prevalence data. OpenMeta analyst and comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) were used for the meta-analysis. The random effect model was used, and publication bias was assessed using the Eggers test and funnel plot. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed, and the sources were analyzed using the leave-one-out meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria, but because some studies reported the prevalence of VRE in more than one companion animal, they were considered as individual studies, and 35 studies were therefore added to the final meta-analysis. Sampling period of the included studies was from 1995–2018. Of the 4288 isolates tested in the included studies, 1241 were VRE. The pooled prevalence of VRE in companion animals was estimated at 14.6% (95% CI; 8.7–23.5%; I(2) = 97.10%; p < 0.001). Between-study variability was high (t(2) = 2.859; heterogeneity I(2) = 97.10% with heterogeneity chi-square (Q) = 1173.346, degrees of freedom (df) = 34, and p < 0.001). The funnel plot showed bias, which was confirmed by Eggers test (t-value = 3.97165; p = 0.00036), and estimates from the leave-one-out forest plot did not affect the pooled prevalence. Pooled prevalence of VRE in dogs and cats were 18.2% (CI = 9.4–32.5%) and 12.3%, CI = 3.8–33.1%), respectively. More studies were reported in Europe than in any other continent, with most studies using feces as the sample type and disc diffusion as the detection method. With the emergence of resistant strains, new antimicrobials are required in veterinary medicine. MDPI 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7911405/ /pubmed/33572528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020138 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wada, Yusuf Irekeola, Ahmad Adebayo E.A.R., Engku Nur Syafirah Yusof, Wardah Lih Huey, Lee Ladan Muhammad, Suwaiba Harun, Azian Yean, Chan Yean Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title | Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full | Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_short | Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in Companion Animals: The First Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_sort | prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (vre) in companion animals: the first meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7911405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadayusuf prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT irekeolaahmadadebayo prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT earengkunursyafirah prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT yusofwardah prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT lihhueylee prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT ladanmuhammadsuwaiba prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT harunazian prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT yeanchanyean prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT zaidahabdulrahman prevalenceofvancomycinresistantenterococcusvreincompanionanimalsthefirstmetaanalysisandsystematicreview |