Cargando…

Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis

This systematic review aimed to assess the advantages of biosensors in detecting biomarkers for the early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). OA is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disease and is a leading cause of disability and pain worldwide. The diagnosis of OA could be performed through clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Candela, Vincenzo, Berton, Alessandra, De Salvatore, Sergio, Fioravanti, Sara, Giannone, Lucia, Marchetti, Anna, De Marinis, Maria Grazia, Denaro, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33561091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11020031
_version_ 1783656535425024000
author Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Candela, Vincenzo
Berton, Alessandra
De Salvatore, Sergio
Fioravanti, Sara
Giannone, Lucia
Marchetti, Anna
De Marinis, Maria Grazia
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_facet Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Candela, Vincenzo
Berton, Alessandra
De Salvatore, Sergio
Fioravanti, Sara
Giannone, Lucia
Marchetti, Anna
De Marinis, Maria Grazia
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_sort Longo, Umile Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aimed to assess the advantages of biosensors in detecting biomarkers for the early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). OA is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disease and is a leading cause of disability and pain worldwide. The diagnosis of OA could be performed through clinical examinations and imaging only during the late stages of the disease. Biomarkers could be used for the diagnosis of the disease in the very early stages. Biosensors could detect biomarkers with high accuracy and low costs. This paper focuses on the biosensors mainly adopted to detect OA markers (electrochemical, optical, Quartz crystal microbalance, molecular and wearable biosensors). A comprehensive search on PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted from the inception to November 2020. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment. From a total amount of 1086 studies identified, only 19 articles were eligible for this study. The main advantages of the biosensors reported were accuracy, limited cost and ease of use, compared to traditional methods (ELISA). Otherwise, due to the lack of data and the low level of evidence of the papers included, it was impossible to find significant results. Therefore, further high-quality studies are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7912259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79122592021-02-28 Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis Longo, Umile Giuseppe Candela, Vincenzo Berton, Alessandra De Salvatore, Sergio Fioravanti, Sara Giannone, Lucia Marchetti, Anna De Marinis, Maria Grazia Denaro, Vincenzo Biosensors (Basel) Systematic Review This systematic review aimed to assess the advantages of biosensors in detecting biomarkers for the early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). OA is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disease and is a leading cause of disability and pain worldwide. The diagnosis of OA could be performed through clinical examinations and imaging only during the late stages of the disease. Biomarkers could be used for the diagnosis of the disease in the very early stages. Biosensors could detect biomarkers with high accuracy and low costs. This paper focuses on the biosensors mainly adopted to detect OA markers (electrochemical, optical, Quartz crystal microbalance, molecular and wearable biosensors). A comprehensive search on PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted from the inception to November 2020. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment. From a total amount of 1086 studies identified, only 19 articles were eligible for this study. The main advantages of the biosensors reported were accuracy, limited cost and ease of use, compared to traditional methods (ELISA). Otherwise, due to the lack of data and the low level of evidence of the papers included, it was impossible to find significant results. Therefore, further high-quality studies are required. MDPI 2021-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7912259/ /pubmed/33561091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11020031 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Candela, Vincenzo
Berton, Alessandra
De Salvatore, Sergio
Fioravanti, Sara
Giannone, Lucia
Marchetti, Anna
De Marinis, Maria Grazia
Denaro, Vincenzo
Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title_full Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title_short Biosensors for Detection of Biochemical Markers Relevant to Osteoarthritis
title_sort biosensors for detection of biochemical markers relevant to osteoarthritis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33561091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11020031
work_keys_str_mv AT longoumilegiuseppe biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT candelavincenzo biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT bertonalessandra biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT desalvatoresergio biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT fioravantisara biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT giannonelucia biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT marchettianna biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT demarinismariagrazia biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis
AT denarovincenzo biosensorsfordetectionofbiochemicalmarkersrelevanttoosteoarthritis