Cargando…

Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study

During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Lisa, Vogt, Lutz, Wilke, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104
_version_ 1783656538097844224
author Mohr, Lisa
Vogt, Lutz
Wilke, Jan
author_facet Mohr, Lisa
Vogt, Lutz
Wilke, Jan
author_sort Mohr, Lisa
collection PubMed
description During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the semitendinosus muscle of eleven adults (35.8 ± 9.8 years), stopping briefly at intervals of 0.5 cm. Transducer motion was quantified (1) measuring the 2-D displacement of the shadow produced by reflective tape (RT) attached to the skin and (2) using a marker-based, three-dimensional movement analysis system (MAS). Differences between methods were detected with Wilcoxon tests; associations were checked by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3.1) and Bland–Altman plots. Values for RT (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and MAS (r = 0.19, p = 0.002) were significantly higher than true distances (TD). Strong correlations were found between RT and TD (ICC: 0.98, p < 0.001), MAS and TD (ICC: 0.95, p < 0.001), and MAS and RT (ICC: 0.97, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed narrow limits of agreement for both RT (−0.49 to 0.13 cm) and MAS (−0.49 to 0.34 cm) versus TD. RT and MAS are valid methods to quantify US transducer movement. In view of its low costs and complexity, RT can particularly be recommended for application in research and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7912270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79122702021-02-28 Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study Mohr, Lisa Vogt, Lutz Wilke, Jan Life (Basel) Article During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the semitendinosus muscle of eleven adults (35.8 ± 9.8 years), stopping briefly at intervals of 0.5 cm. Transducer motion was quantified (1) measuring the 2-D displacement of the shadow produced by reflective tape (RT) attached to the skin and (2) using a marker-based, three-dimensional movement analysis system (MAS). Differences between methods were detected with Wilcoxon tests; associations were checked by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3.1) and Bland–Altman plots. Values for RT (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and MAS (r = 0.19, p = 0.002) were significantly higher than true distances (TD). Strong correlations were found between RT and TD (ICC: 0.98, p < 0.001), MAS and TD (ICC: 0.95, p < 0.001), and MAS and RT (ICC: 0.97, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed narrow limits of agreement for both RT (−0.49 to 0.13 cm) and MAS (−0.49 to 0.34 cm) versus TD. RT and MAS are valid methods to quantify US transducer movement. In view of its low costs and complexity, RT can particularly be recommended for application in research and clinical practice. MDPI 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7912270/ /pubmed/33573159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mohr, Lisa
Vogt, Lutz
Wilke, Jan
Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title_full Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title_fullStr Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title_short Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
title_sort use of reflective tape to detect ultrasound transducer movement: a validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrlisa useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy
AT vogtlutz useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy
AT wilkejan useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy