Cargando…
Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study
During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104 |
_version_ | 1783656538097844224 |
---|---|
author | Mohr, Lisa Vogt, Lutz Wilke, Jan |
author_facet | Mohr, Lisa Vogt, Lutz Wilke, Jan |
author_sort | Mohr, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the semitendinosus muscle of eleven adults (35.8 ± 9.8 years), stopping briefly at intervals of 0.5 cm. Transducer motion was quantified (1) measuring the 2-D displacement of the shadow produced by reflective tape (RT) attached to the skin and (2) using a marker-based, three-dimensional movement analysis system (MAS). Differences between methods were detected with Wilcoxon tests; associations were checked by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3.1) and Bland–Altman plots. Values for RT (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and MAS (r = 0.19, p = 0.002) were significantly higher than true distances (TD). Strong correlations were found between RT and TD (ICC: 0.98, p < 0.001), MAS and TD (ICC: 0.95, p < 0.001), and MAS and RT (ICC: 0.97, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed narrow limits of agreement for both RT (−0.49 to 0.13 cm) and MAS (−0.49 to 0.34 cm) versus TD. RT and MAS are valid methods to quantify US transducer movement. In view of its low costs and complexity, RT can particularly be recommended for application in research and clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7912270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79122702021-02-28 Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study Mohr, Lisa Vogt, Lutz Wilke, Jan Life (Basel) Article During dynamic ultrasound assessments, unintended transducer movement over the skin needs to be prevented as it may bias the results. The present study investigated the validity of two methods quantifying transducer motion. An ultrasound transducer was moved on a pre-specified 3 cm distance over the semitendinosus muscle of eleven adults (35.8 ± 9.8 years), stopping briefly at intervals of 0.5 cm. Transducer motion was quantified (1) measuring the 2-D displacement of the shadow produced by reflective tape (RT) attached to the skin and (2) using a marker-based, three-dimensional movement analysis system (MAS). Differences between methods were detected with Wilcoxon tests; associations were checked by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3.1) and Bland–Altman plots. Values for RT (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and MAS (r = 0.19, p = 0.002) were significantly higher than true distances (TD). Strong correlations were found between RT and TD (ICC: 0.98, p < 0.001), MAS and TD (ICC: 0.95, p < 0.001), and MAS and RT (ICC: 0.97, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed narrow limits of agreement for both RT (−0.49 to 0.13 cm) and MAS (−0.49 to 0.34 cm) versus TD. RT and MAS are valid methods to quantify US transducer movement. In view of its low costs and complexity, RT can particularly be recommended for application in research and clinical practice. MDPI 2021-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7912270/ /pubmed/33573159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mohr, Lisa Vogt, Lutz Wilke, Jan Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title | Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title_full | Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title_fullStr | Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title_short | Use of Reflective Tape to Detect Ultrasound Transducer Movement: A Validation Study |
title_sort | use of reflective tape to detect ultrasound transducer movement: a validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11020104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohrlisa useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy AT vogtlutz useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy AT wilkejan useofreflectivetapetodetectultrasoundtransducermovementavalidationstudy |