Cargando…

Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses

Canine cutaneous epitheliotropic T-cell lymphoma (CETL) and immune-mediated T-cell predominant dermatoses (IMD) share several clinical and histopathological features, but differ substantially in prognosis. The discrimination of ambiguous cases may be challenging, as diagnostic tests are limited and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerber, Nadja, Brunner, Magdalena A. T., Jagannathan, Vidhya, Leeb, Tosso, Gerhards, Nora M., Welle, Monika M., Dettwiler, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020160
_version_ 1783656542529126400
author Gerber, Nadja
Brunner, Magdalena A. T.
Jagannathan, Vidhya
Leeb, Tosso
Gerhards, Nora M.
Welle, Monika M.
Dettwiler, Martina
author_facet Gerber, Nadja
Brunner, Magdalena A. T.
Jagannathan, Vidhya
Leeb, Tosso
Gerhards, Nora M.
Welle, Monika M.
Dettwiler, Martina
author_sort Gerber, Nadja
collection PubMed
description Canine cutaneous epitheliotropic T-cell lymphoma (CETL) and immune-mediated T-cell predominant dermatoses (IMD) share several clinical and histopathological features, but differ substantially in prognosis. The discrimination of ambiguous cases may be challenging, as diagnostic tests are limited and may prove equivocal. This study aimed to investigate transcriptional differences between CETL and IMD, as a basis for further research on discriminating diagnostic biomarkers. We performed 100bp single-end sequencing on RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded skin biopsies from dogs with CETL and IMD, respectively. DESeq2 was used for principal component analysis (PCA) and differential gene expression analysis. Genes with significantly different expression were analyzed for enriched pathways using two different tools. The expression of selected genes and their proteins was validated by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. PCA demonstrated the distinct gene expression profiles of CETL and IMD. In total, 503 genes were upregulated, while 4986 were downregulated in CETL compared to IMD. RT-qPCR confirmed the sequencing results for 5/6 selected genes tested, while the protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry was not entirely consistent. Our study revealed transcriptional differences between canine CETL and IMD, with similarities to human cutaneous lymphoma. Differentially expressed genes are potential discriminatory markers, but require further validation on larger sample collections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7912288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79122882021-02-28 Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses Gerber, Nadja Brunner, Magdalena A. T. Jagannathan, Vidhya Leeb, Tosso Gerhards, Nora M. Welle, Monika M. Dettwiler, Martina Genes (Basel) Article Canine cutaneous epitheliotropic T-cell lymphoma (CETL) and immune-mediated T-cell predominant dermatoses (IMD) share several clinical and histopathological features, but differ substantially in prognosis. The discrimination of ambiguous cases may be challenging, as diagnostic tests are limited and may prove equivocal. This study aimed to investigate transcriptional differences between CETL and IMD, as a basis for further research on discriminating diagnostic biomarkers. We performed 100bp single-end sequencing on RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded skin biopsies from dogs with CETL and IMD, respectively. DESeq2 was used for principal component analysis (PCA) and differential gene expression analysis. Genes with significantly different expression were analyzed for enriched pathways using two different tools. The expression of selected genes and their proteins was validated by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. PCA demonstrated the distinct gene expression profiles of CETL and IMD. In total, 503 genes were upregulated, while 4986 were downregulated in CETL compared to IMD. RT-qPCR confirmed the sequencing results for 5/6 selected genes tested, while the protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry was not entirely consistent. Our study revealed transcriptional differences between canine CETL and IMD, with similarities to human cutaneous lymphoma. Differentially expressed genes are potential discriminatory markers, but require further validation on larger sample collections. MDPI 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7912288/ /pubmed/33504055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020160 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gerber, Nadja
Brunner, Magdalena A. T.
Jagannathan, Vidhya
Leeb, Tosso
Gerhards, Nora M.
Welle, Monika M.
Dettwiler, Martina
Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title_full Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title_fullStr Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title_short Transcriptional Differences between Canine Cutaneous Epitheliotropic Lymphoma and Immune-Mediated Dermatoses
title_sort transcriptional differences between canine cutaneous epitheliotropic lymphoma and immune-mediated dermatoses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12020160
work_keys_str_mv AT gerbernadja transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT brunnermagdalenaat transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT jagannathanvidhya transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT leebtosso transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT gerhardsnoram transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT wellemonikam transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses
AT dettwilermartina transcriptionaldifferencesbetweencaninecutaneousepitheliotropiclymphomaandimmunemediateddermatoses