Cargando…

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Influenza endangers human health but can be prevented in part by vaccination. Assessing influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) provides scientific evidence for developing influenza vaccination policy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated influenza VE in mainland...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xiaokun, Zhao, Hongting, Li, Zhili, Zhu, Aiqin, Ren, Minrui, Geng, Mengjie, Li, Yu, Qin, Ying, Feng, Luzhao, Peng, Zhibin, An, Zhijie, Zheng, Jiandong, Li, Zhongjie, Feng, Zijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33498688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020079
_version_ 1783656609895940096
author Yang, Xiaokun
Zhao, Hongting
Li, Zhili
Zhu, Aiqin
Ren, Minrui
Geng, Mengjie
Li, Yu
Qin, Ying
Feng, Luzhao
Peng, Zhibin
An, Zhijie
Zheng, Jiandong
Li, Zhongjie
Feng, Zijian
author_facet Yang, Xiaokun
Zhao, Hongting
Li, Zhili
Zhu, Aiqin
Ren, Minrui
Geng, Mengjie
Li, Yu
Qin, Ying
Feng, Luzhao
Peng, Zhibin
An, Zhijie
Zheng, Jiandong
Li, Zhongjie
Feng, Zijian
author_sort Yang, Xiaokun
collection PubMed
description Influenza endangers human health but can be prevented in part by vaccination. Assessing influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) provides scientific evidence for developing influenza vaccination policy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated influenza VE in mainland China. We searched six relevant databases as of 30 August 2019 to identify studies and used Review Manager 5.3 software to analyze the included studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of publication bias. We identified 1408 publications, and after removing duplicates and screening full texts, we included 21 studies in the analyses. Studies were conducted in Beijing, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Zhejiang province from the 2010/11 influenza season through the 2017/18 influenza season. Overall influenza VE for laboratory confirmed influenza was 36% (95% CI: 25–46%). In the subgroup analysis, VE was 45% (95% CI: 18–64%) for children 6–35 months who received one dose of influenza vaccine, and 57% (95% CI: 50–64%) who received two doses. VE was 47% (95% CI: 39–54%) for children 6 months to 8 years, and 18% (95% CI: 0–33%) for adults ≥60 years. For inpatients, VE was 21% (95% CI: −11–44%). We conclude that influenza vaccines that were used in mainland China had a moderate effectiveness, with VE being higher among children than the elderly. Influenza VE should be continuously monitored in mainland China to provide evidence for policy making and improving uptake of the influenza vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7912587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79125872021-02-28 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yang, Xiaokun Zhao, Hongting Li, Zhili Zhu, Aiqin Ren, Minrui Geng, Mengjie Li, Yu Qin, Ying Feng, Luzhao Peng, Zhibin An, Zhijie Zheng, Jiandong Li, Zhongjie Feng, Zijian Vaccines (Basel) Review Influenza endangers human health but can be prevented in part by vaccination. Assessing influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) provides scientific evidence for developing influenza vaccination policy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated influenza VE in mainland China. We searched six relevant databases as of 30 August 2019 to identify studies and used Review Manager 5.3 software to analyze the included studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of publication bias. We identified 1408 publications, and after removing duplicates and screening full texts, we included 21 studies in the analyses. Studies were conducted in Beijing, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Zhejiang province from the 2010/11 influenza season through the 2017/18 influenza season. Overall influenza VE for laboratory confirmed influenza was 36% (95% CI: 25–46%). In the subgroup analysis, VE was 45% (95% CI: 18–64%) for children 6–35 months who received one dose of influenza vaccine, and 57% (95% CI: 50–64%) who received two doses. VE was 47% (95% CI: 39–54%) for children 6 months to 8 years, and 18% (95% CI: 0–33%) for adults ≥60 years. For inpatients, VE was 21% (95% CI: −11–44%). We conclude that influenza vaccines that were used in mainland China had a moderate effectiveness, with VE being higher among children than the elderly. Influenza VE should be continuously monitored in mainland China to provide evidence for policy making and improving uptake of the influenza vaccine. MDPI 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7912587/ /pubmed/33498688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020079 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yang, Xiaokun
Zhao, Hongting
Li, Zhili
Zhu, Aiqin
Ren, Minrui
Geng, Mengjie
Li, Yu
Qin, Ying
Feng, Luzhao
Peng, Zhibin
An, Zhijie
Zheng, Jiandong
Li, Zhongjie
Feng, Zijian
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort influenza vaccine effectiveness in mainland china: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33498688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020079
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxiaokun influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaohongting influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhili influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuaiqin influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renminrui influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gengmengjie influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyu influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinying influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengluzhao influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengzhibin influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anzhijie influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengjiandong influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhongjie influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengzijian influenzavaccineeffectivenessinmainlandchinaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis