Cargando…

How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications

This review documents the history of the two papers written half a century ago that relate to this special issue of Cells. The first, “Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects” (Biological Reviews, 1970), stressed that sexual selection continues after ejaculation, resulting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Parker, Geoff A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33535413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020287
_version_ 1783656640504922112
author Parker, Geoff A.
author_facet Parker, Geoff A.
author_sort Parker, Geoff A.
collection PubMed
description This review documents the history of the two papers written half a century ago that relate to this special issue of Cells. The first, “Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects” (Biological Reviews, 1970), stressed that sexual selection continues after ejaculation, resulting in many adaptations (e.g., postcopulatory guarding phases, copulatory plugs, seminal fluid components that modify female reproduction, and optimal ejaculation strategies), an aspect not considered by Darwin in his classic treatise of 1871. Sperm competition has subsequently been studied in many taxa, and post-copulatory sexual selection is now considered an important sequel to Darwinian pre-copulatory sexual selection. The second, “The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon” (Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1972) showed how selection, based on gamete competition between individuals, can give rise to anisogamy in an isogamous broadcast spawning ancestor. This theory, which has subsequently been developed in various ways, is argued to form the most powerful explanation of why there are two sexes in most multicellular organisms. Together, the two papers have influenced our general understanding of the evolutionary differentiation of the two forms of gametic cells, and the divergence of sexual strategies between males and females under sexual selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7912719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79127192021-02-28 How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications Parker, Geoff A. Cells Opinion This review documents the history of the two papers written half a century ago that relate to this special issue of Cells. The first, “Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects” (Biological Reviews, 1970), stressed that sexual selection continues after ejaculation, resulting in many adaptations (e.g., postcopulatory guarding phases, copulatory plugs, seminal fluid components that modify female reproduction, and optimal ejaculation strategies), an aspect not considered by Darwin in his classic treatise of 1871. Sperm competition has subsequently been studied in many taxa, and post-copulatory sexual selection is now considered an important sequel to Darwinian pre-copulatory sexual selection. The second, “The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon” (Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1972) showed how selection, based on gamete competition between individuals, can give rise to anisogamy in an isogamous broadcast spawning ancestor. This theory, which has subsequently been developed in various ways, is argued to form the most powerful explanation of why there are two sexes in most multicellular organisms. Together, the two papers have influenced our general understanding of the evolutionary differentiation of the two forms of gametic cells, and the divergence of sexual strategies between males and females under sexual selection. MDPI 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7912719/ /pubmed/33535413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020287 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Parker, Geoff A.
How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title_full How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title_fullStr How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title_full_unstemmed How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title_short How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two “Seminal” Publications
title_sort how soon hath time… a history of two “seminal” publications
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33535413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020287
work_keys_str_mv AT parkergeoffa howsoonhathtimeahistoryoftwoseminalpublications