Cargando…
Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation
COVID-19 may lead to serious respiratory complications which may necessitate ventilatory support. There is concern surrounding potential release of patient-derived bioaerosol during nebuliser drug refill, which could impact the health of caregivers. Consequently, mesh nebulisers have been recommende...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020199 |
_version_ | 1783656704239468544 |
---|---|
author | Joyce, Mary McGrath, James A. Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O’Sullivan, Andrew Byrne, Miriam MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_facet | Joyce, Mary McGrath, James A. Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O’Sullivan, Andrew Byrne, Miriam MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_sort | Joyce, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | COVID-19 may lead to serious respiratory complications which may necessitate ventilatory support. There is concern surrounding potential release of patient-derived bioaerosol during nebuliser drug refill, which could impact the health of caregivers. Consequently, mesh nebulisers have been recommended by various clinical practice guidelines. Currently, there is a lack of empirical data describing the potential for release of patient-derived bioaerosol during drug refill. This study examined the release of simulated patient-derived bioaerosol, and the effect on positive end expiratory pressure during nebuliser refill during mechanical ventilation of a simulated patient. During jet nebuliser refill, the positive end expiratory pressure decreased from 4.5 to 0 cm H(2)O. No loss in pressure was noted during vibrating mesh nebuliser refill. A median particle number concentration of 710 particles cm(−3) above ambient was detected when refilling the jet nebuliser in comparison to no increase above ambient detected when using the vibrating mesh nebuliser. The jet nebuliser with the endotracheal tube clamped resulted in 60 particles cm(−3) above ambient levels. This study confirms that choice of nebuliser impacts both the potential for patient-derived bioaerosol release and the ability to maintain ventilator circuit pressures and validates the recommended use of mesh nebulisers during mechanical ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7912998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79129982021-02-28 Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation Joyce, Mary McGrath, James A. Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O’Sullivan, Andrew Byrne, Miriam MacLoughlin, Ronan Pharmaceutics Article COVID-19 may lead to serious respiratory complications which may necessitate ventilatory support. There is concern surrounding potential release of patient-derived bioaerosol during nebuliser drug refill, which could impact the health of caregivers. Consequently, mesh nebulisers have been recommended by various clinical practice guidelines. Currently, there is a lack of empirical data describing the potential for release of patient-derived bioaerosol during drug refill. This study examined the release of simulated patient-derived bioaerosol, and the effect on positive end expiratory pressure during nebuliser refill during mechanical ventilation of a simulated patient. During jet nebuliser refill, the positive end expiratory pressure decreased from 4.5 to 0 cm H(2)O. No loss in pressure was noted during vibrating mesh nebuliser refill. A median particle number concentration of 710 particles cm(−3) above ambient was detected when refilling the jet nebuliser in comparison to no increase above ambient detected when using the vibrating mesh nebuliser. The jet nebuliser with the endotracheal tube clamped resulted in 60 particles cm(−3) above ambient levels. This study confirms that choice of nebuliser impacts both the potential for patient-derived bioaerosol release and the ability to maintain ventilator circuit pressures and validates the recommended use of mesh nebulisers during mechanical ventilation. MDPI 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7912998/ /pubmed/33540764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020199 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Joyce, Mary McGrath, James A. Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O’Sullivan, Andrew Byrne, Miriam MacLoughlin, Ronan Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title | Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title_full | Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title_fullStr | Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title_short | Nebuliser Type Influences Both Patient-Derived Bioaerosol Emissions and Ventilation Parameters during Mechanical Ventilation |
title_sort | nebuliser type influences both patient-derived bioaerosol emissions and ventilation parameters during mechanical ventilation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joycemary nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation AT mcgrathjamesa nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation AT macgiollaeainmarc nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation AT osullivanandrew nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation AT byrnemiriam nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation AT macloughlinronan nebulisertypeinfluencesbothpatientderivedbioaerosolemissionsandventilationparametersduringmechanicalventilation |