Cargando…

Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review

The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guadagnolo, Daniele, Mastromoro, Gioia, Di Palma, Francesca, Pizzuti, Antonio, Marchionni, Enrica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224
_version_ 1783656705684406272
author Guadagnolo, Daniele
Mastromoro, Gioia
Di Palma, Francesca
Pizzuti, Antonio
Marchionni, Enrica
author_facet Guadagnolo, Daniele
Mastromoro, Gioia
Di Palma, Francesca
Pizzuti, Antonio
Marchionni, Enrica
author_sort Guadagnolo, Daniele
collection PubMed
description The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79130042021-02-28 Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review Guadagnolo, Daniele Mastromoro, Gioia Di Palma, Francesca Pizzuti, Antonio Marchionni, Enrica Diagnostics (Basel) Review The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future. MDPI 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7913004/ /pubmed/33540854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Guadagnolo, Daniele
Mastromoro, Gioia
Di Palma, Francesca
Pizzuti, Antonio
Marchionni, Enrica
Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title_full Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title_short Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
title_sort prenatal exome sequencing: background, current practice and future perspectives—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224
work_keys_str_mv AT guadagnolodaniele prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview
AT mastromorogioia prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview
AT dipalmafrancesca prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview
AT pizzutiantonio prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview
AT marchionnienrica prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview