Cargando…
Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review
The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224 |
_version_ | 1783656705684406272 |
---|---|
author | Guadagnolo, Daniele Mastromoro, Gioia Di Palma, Francesca Pizzuti, Antonio Marchionni, Enrica |
author_facet | Guadagnolo, Daniele Mastromoro, Gioia Di Palma, Francesca Pizzuti, Antonio Marchionni, Enrica |
author_sort | Guadagnolo, Daniele |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7913004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79130042021-02-28 Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review Guadagnolo, Daniele Mastromoro, Gioia Di Palma, Francesca Pizzuti, Antonio Marchionni, Enrica Diagnostics (Basel) Review The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future. MDPI 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7913004/ /pubmed/33540854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Guadagnolo, Daniele Mastromoro, Gioia Di Palma, Francesca Pizzuti, Antonio Marchionni, Enrica Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title | Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | prenatal exome sequencing: background, current practice and future perspectives—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guadagnolodaniele prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview AT mastromorogioia prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview AT dipalmafrancesca prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview AT pizzutiantonio prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview AT marchionnienrica prenatalexomesequencingbackgroundcurrentpracticeandfutureperspectivesasystematicreview |