Cargando…
New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move?
The new mobilities paradigm has been influential within the social sciences for the past two decades. And yet, psychology is undoubtably slow to incorporate mobility as a key lens through which to consider its subject area. In this editorial, I will make the case that we would benefit greatly from f...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PsychOpen
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680177 http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i2.3117 |
_version_ | 1783656707079012352 |
---|---|
author | Glăveanu, Vlad P. |
author_facet | Glăveanu, Vlad P. |
author_sort | Glăveanu, Vlad P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The new mobilities paradigm has been influential within the social sciences for the past two decades. And yet, psychology is undoubtably slow to incorporate mobility as a key lens through which to consider its subject area. In this editorial, I will make the case that we would benefit greatly from focusing more on personal, collective and psychological mobilities and the kinds of conceptual, methodological and practical challenges they raise. To illustrate this, I briefly discuss the notions of self and identity, learning, and imagination and creativity. Final conclusions are offered regarding a late but welcomed ‘mobilities turn’ in psychological science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7913010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PsychOpen |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79130102021-03-04 New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? Glăveanu, Vlad P. Eur J Psychol Editorial The new mobilities paradigm has been influential within the social sciences for the past two decades. And yet, psychology is undoubtably slow to incorporate mobility as a key lens through which to consider its subject area. In this editorial, I will make the case that we would benefit greatly from focusing more on personal, collective and psychological mobilities and the kinds of conceptual, methodological and practical challenges they raise. To illustrate this, I briefly discuss the notions of self and identity, learning, and imagination and creativity. Final conclusions are offered regarding a late but welcomed ‘mobilities turn’ in psychological science. PsychOpen 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7913010/ /pubmed/33680177 http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i2.3117 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Glăveanu, Vlad P. New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title | New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title_full | New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title_fullStr | New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title_full_unstemmed | New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title_short | New Mobilities and Psychology: Why are We Still Not on the Move? |
title_sort | new mobilities and psychology: why are we still not on the move? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680177 http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i2.3117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glaveanuvladp newmobilitiesandpsychologywhyarewestillnotonthemove |