Cargando…

Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?

Approximately 0.1% for term and 10–15% of preterm infants receive chest compression (CC) in the delivery room, with high incidence of mortality and neurologic impairment. The poor prognosis associated with receiving CC in the delivery room has raised concerns as to whether specifically-tailored card...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seung Yeon, Shim, Gyu-Hong, Schmölzer, Georg M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8020097
_version_ 1783656709897584640
author Kim, Seung Yeon
Shim, Gyu-Hong
Schmölzer, Georg M.
author_facet Kim, Seung Yeon
Shim, Gyu-Hong
Schmölzer, Georg M.
author_sort Kim, Seung Yeon
collection PubMed
description Approximately 0.1% for term and 10–15% of preterm infants receive chest compression (CC) in the delivery room, with high incidence of mortality and neurologic impairment. The poor prognosis associated with receiving CC in the delivery room has raised concerns as to whether specifically-tailored cardiopulmonary resuscitation methods are needed. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend a 3:1 compression:ventilation ratio; however, the most effective approach to deliver chest compression is unknown. We recently demonstrated that providing continuous chest compression superimposed with a high distending pressure or sustained inflation significantly reduced time to return of spontaneous circulation and mortality while improving respiratory and cardiovascular parameters in asphyxiated piglet and newborn infants. This review summarizes the current available evidence of continuous chest compression superimposed with a sustained inflation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79130222021-02-28 Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants? Kim, Seung Yeon Shim, Gyu-Hong Schmölzer, Georg M. Children (Basel) Review Approximately 0.1% for term and 10–15% of preterm infants receive chest compression (CC) in the delivery room, with high incidence of mortality and neurologic impairment. The poor prognosis associated with receiving CC in the delivery room has raised concerns as to whether specifically-tailored cardiopulmonary resuscitation methods are needed. The current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend a 3:1 compression:ventilation ratio; however, the most effective approach to deliver chest compression is unknown. We recently demonstrated that providing continuous chest compression superimposed with a high distending pressure or sustained inflation significantly reduced time to return of spontaneous circulation and mortality while improving respiratory and cardiovascular parameters in asphyxiated piglet and newborn infants. This review summarizes the current available evidence of continuous chest compression superimposed with a sustained inflation. MDPI 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7913022/ /pubmed/33540820 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8020097 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Seung Yeon
Shim, Gyu-Hong
Schmölzer, Georg M.
Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title_full Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title_fullStr Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title_full_unstemmed Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title_short Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?
title_sort is chest compression superimposed with sustained inflation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation an alternative to 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio in newborn infants?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33540820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8020097
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseungyeon ischestcompressionsuperimposedwithsustainedinflationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanalternativeto31compressiontoventilationratioinnewborninfants
AT shimgyuhong ischestcompressionsuperimposedwithsustainedinflationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanalternativeto31compressiontoventilationratioinnewborninfants
AT schmolzergeorgm ischestcompressionsuperimposedwithsustainedinflationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationanalternativeto31compressiontoventilationratioinnewborninfants