Cargando…

Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blazsik, Reka Maria, Beeler, Patrick Emanuel, Tarcak, Karol, Cheetham, Marcus, von Wyl, Viktor, Dressel, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0
_version_ 1783656807995015168
author Blazsik, Reka Maria
Beeler, Patrick Emanuel
Tarcak, Karol
Cheetham, Marcus
von Wyl, Viktor
Dressel, Holger
author_facet Blazsik, Reka Maria
Beeler, Patrick Emanuel
Tarcak, Karol
Cheetham, Marcus
von Wyl, Viktor
Dressel, Holger
author_sort Blazsik, Reka Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: 165,908 inpatients, Swiss teaching hospital. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions. Associations with single and combined rare diseases were analyzed by multivariable regression. KEY RESULTS: Patients with 1 rare disease were at increased risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67, 1.95), combinations of rare diseases showed stronger associations (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.39, 3.23). Females with 1 rare disease had an OR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.50, 1.91) for in-hospital death, an OR of 2.99 (95% CI 2.36, 3.79) if they had a combination of rare diseases. Males had an OR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.68, 2.04) and 2.61 (95% CI 2.15, 3.16), respectively. Rare diseases were associated with longer LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 28 and 49%), ICU admissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.64 [95% CI 1.57, 1.71] and 2.23 [95% CI 2.01, 2.48]), longer ICU LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 14 and 40%), and 30-day readmissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.47, 1.68] and 1.64 [95% CI 1.37, 1.96]). CONCLUSIONS: Rare diseases are independently associated with worse inpatient outcomes. This might be the first study suggesting even stronger associations of combined rare diseases with in-hospital deaths, increased LOS, ICU admissions, increased ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79134582021-03-02 Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population Blazsik, Reka Maria Beeler, Patrick Emanuel Tarcak, Karol Cheetham, Marcus von Wyl, Viktor Dressel, Holger Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: 165,908 inpatients, Swiss teaching hospital. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions. Associations with single and combined rare diseases were analyzed by multivariable regression. KEY RESULTS: Patients with 1 rare disease were at increased risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67, 1.95), combinations of rare diseases showed stronger associations (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.39, 3.23). Females with 1 rare disease had an OR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.50, 1.91) for in-hospital death, an OR of 2.99 (95% CI 2.36, 3.79) if they had a combination of rare diseases. Males had an OR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.68, 2.04) and 2.61 (95% CI 2.15, 3.16), respectively. Rare diseases were associated with longer LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 28 and 49%), ICU admissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.64 [95% CI 1.57, 1.71] and 2.23 [95% CI 2.01, 2.48]), longer ICU LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 14 and 40%), and 30-day readmissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.47, 1.68] and 1.64 [95% CI 1.37, 1.96]). CONCLUSIONS: Rare diseases are independently associated with worse inpatient outcomes. This might be the first study suggesting even stronger associations of combined rare diseases with in-hospital deaths, increased LOS, ICU admissions, increased ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions. BioMed Central 2021-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7913458/ /pubmed/33639989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Blazsik, Reka Maria
Beeler, Patrick Emanuel
Tarcak, Karol
Cheetham, Marcus
von Wyl, Viktor
Dressel, Holger
Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_full Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_fullStr Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_full_unstemmed Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_short Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_sort impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0
work_keys_str_mv AT blazsikrekamaria impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT beelerpatrickemanuel impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT tarcakkarol impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT cheethammarcus impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT vonwylviktor impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT dresselholger impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation