Cargando…

Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy

Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Form...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Post, Anouk L., Faber, Dirk J., Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M., van Leeuwen, Ton G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004
_version_ 1783656839415595008
author Post, Anouk L.
Faber, Dirk J.
Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M.
van Leeuwen, Ton G.
author_facet Post, Anouk L.
Faber, Dirk J.
Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M.
van Leeuwen, Ton G.
author_sort Post, Anouk L.
collection PubMed
description Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Formula: see text]. We validated this model with simulations. Aim: We validate our model experimentally. To prevent overfitting, we investigate the wavelength-dependence of [Formula: see text] and propose a parametrization with only three parameters. We also investigate whether this parametrization enables measurements with a single fiber, as opposed to multiple fibers used in multi-diameter SFR (MDSFR). Approach: We validate our model on 16 phantoms with two concentrations of Intralipid-20% ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at 500 nm) and eight concentrations of Evans Blue ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] at 605 nm). We parametrize [Formula: see text] as [Formula: see text]. Results: Average errors were 7% for [Formula: see text] , 11% for [Formula: see text] , and 16% with the parametrization of [Formula: see text]; and 7%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, without. The parametrization of [Formula: see text] improved the fit speed 25 times (94 s to [Formula: see text]). Average errors for only one fiber were 50%, 33%, and 186%, respectively. Conclusions: Our recently developed model provides accurate results for MDSFR measurements but not for a single fiber. The [Formula: see text] parametrization prevents overfitting and speeds up the fit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79136012021-02-27 Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy Post, Anouk L. Faber, Dirk J. Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M. van Leeuwen, Ton G. J Biomed Opt General Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Formula: see text]. We validated this model with simulations. Aim: We validate our model experimentally. To prevent overfitting, we investigate the wavelength-dependence of [Formula: see text] and propose a parametrization with only three parameters. We also investigate whether this parametrization enables measurements with a single fiber, as opposed to multiple fibers used in multi-diameter SFR (MDSFR). Approach: We validate our model on 16 phantoms with two concentrations of Intralipid-20% ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at 500 nm) and eight concentrations of Evans Blue ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] at 605 nm). We parametrize [Formula: see text] as [Formula: see text]. Results: Average errors were 7% for [Formula: see text] , 11% for [Formula: see text] , and 16% with the parametrization of [Formula: see text]; and 7%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, without. The parametrization of [Formula: see text] improved the fit speed 25 times (94 s to [Formula: see text]). Average errors for only one fiber were 50%, 33%, and 186%, respectively. Conclusions: Our recently developed model provides accurate results for MDSFR measurements but not for a single fiber. The [Formula: see text] parametrization prevents overfitting and speeds up the fit. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-02-27 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7913601/ /pubmed/33641270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle General
Post, Anouk L.
Faber, Dirk J.
Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M.
van Leeuwen, Ton G.
Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title_full Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title_fullStr Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title_short Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
title_sort experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
topic General
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004
work_keys_str_mv AT postanoukl experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy
AT faberdirkj experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy
AT sterenborghenricusjcm experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy
AT vanleeuwentong experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy