Cargando…
Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy
Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Form...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004 |
_version_ | 1783656839415595008 |
---|---|
author | Post, Anouk L. Faber, Dirk J. Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M. van Leeuwen, Ton G. |
author_facet | Post, Anouk L. Faber, Dirk J. Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M. van Leeuwen, Ton G. |
author_sort | Post, Anouk L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Formula: see text]. We validated this model with simulations. Aim: We validate our model experimentally. To prevent overfitting, we investigate the wavelength-dependence of [Formula: see text] and propose a parametrization with only three parameters. We also investigate whether this parametrization enables measurements with a single fiber, as opposed to multiple fibers used in multi-diameter SFR (MDSFR). Approach: We validate our model on 16 phantoms with two concentrations of Intralipid-20% ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at 500 nm) and eight concentrations of Evans Blue ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] at 605 nm). We parametrize [Formula: see text] as [Formula: see text]. Results: Average errors were 7% for [Formula: see text] , 11% for [Formula: see text] , and 16% with the parametrization of [Formula: see text]; and 7%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, without. The parametrization of [Formula: see text] improved the fit speed 25 times (94 s to [Formula: see text]). Average errors for only one fiber were 50%, 33%, and 186%, respectively. Conclusions: Our recently developed model provides accurate results for MDSFR measurements but not for a single fiber. The [Formula: see text] parametrization prevents overfitting and speeds up the fit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7913601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79136012021-02-27 Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy Post, Anouk L. Faber, Dirk J. Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M. van Leeuwen, Ton G. J Biomed Opt General Significance: We recently developed a model for the reflectance measured with (multi-diameter) single-fiber reflectance (SFR) spectroscopy as a function of the reduced scattering coefficient [Formula: see text] , the absorption coefficient [Formula: see text] , and the phase function parameter [Formula: see text]. We validated this model with simulations. Aim: We validate our model experimentally. To prevent overfitting, we investigate the wavelength-dependence of [Formula: see text] and propose a parametrization with only three parameters. We also investigate whether this parametrization enables measurements with a single fiber, as opposed to multiple fibers used in multi-diameter SFR (MDSFR). Approach: We validate our model on 16 phantoms with two concentrations of Intralipid-20% ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at 500 nm) and eight concentrations of Evans Blue ([Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] at 605 nm). We parametrize [Formula: see text] as [Formula: see text]. Results: Average errors were 7% for [Formula: see text] , 11% for [Formula: see text] , and 16% with the parametrization of [Formula: see text]; and 7%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, without. The parametrization of [Formula: see text] improved the fit speed 25 times (94 s to [Formula: see text]). Average errors for only one fiber were 50%, 33%, and 186%, respectively. Conclusions: Our recently developed model provides accurate results for MDSFR measurements but not for a single fiber. The [Formula: see text] parametrization prevents overfitting and speeds up the fit. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-02-27 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7913601/ /pubmed/33641270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | General Post, Anouk L. Faber, Dirk J. Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M. van Leeuwen, Ton G. Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title | Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title_full | Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title_fullStr | Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title_short | Experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
title_sort | experimental validation of a recently developed model for single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy |
topic | General |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.2.025004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT postanoukl experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy AT faberdirkj experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy AT sterenborghenricusjcm experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy AT vanleeuwentong experimentalvalidationofarecentlydevelopedmodelforsinglefiberreflectancespectroscopy |